Lane Detection and Classification using Cascaded CNNs

Alejandro Barrera; Fabio Pizzati; Fernando Garc\'ia; Marco Allodi

arxiv: 1907.01294 · v2 · pith:4DVFO7R6new · submitted 2019-07-02 · 💻 cs.CV

Lane Detection and Classification using Cascaded CNNs

Fabio Pizzati , Marco Allodi , Alejandro Barrera , Fernando Garc\'ia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords lane detectionlane classificationcascaded CNNsTuSimple datasetautonomous vehiclesreal-timecomputer visiondeep learning

0 comments

The pith

Two cascaded CNNs identify, cluster, and classify lane boundaries in real time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an end-to-end system that uses two cascaded neural networks to first identify and cluster lane boundaries and then classify each boundary into one of eight types. The authors created training data by manually labeling 14336 lane boundary instances drawn from the TuSimple dataset. A sympathetic reader would care because lane-type information can support path planning and localization tasks that position alone cannot address.

Core claim

We present an end-to-end system for lane boundary identification, clustering and classification, based on two cascaded neural networks, that runs in real-time. To build the system, 14336 lane boundaries instances of the TuSimple dataset for lane detection have been labelled using 8 different classes.

What carries the argument

Two cascaded neural networks that perform sequential identification-clustering followed by classification of lane boundaries.

If this is right

The system supplies lane-type labels that can be fed directly into path-planning modules.
Real-time execution allows the pipeline to be deployed on vehicle hardware without additional latency hardware.
The released set of 14336 labeled instances can serve as a benchmark for other lane-classification methods.
Cascading the networks separates the detection-clustering stage from the classification stage, permitting independent retraining of either component.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same cascade structure could be tested on datasets that contain painted arrows or temporary lane markings to check whether the eight-class taxonomy extends.
Pairing the output lane types with GPS measurements might reduce drift in map-based localization by supplying explicit lane-identity constraints.
Because the two networks are separate, one could replace the first-stage detector with a lighter model and measure any change in end-to-end latency and accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

Manual labeling of 14336 lane boundary instances supplies accurate and representative training data that lets the classification network generalize to new scenes.

What would settle it

Running the trained classification network on an unseen dataset containing lane types or road conditions absent from the labeled TuSimple subset and measuring a sharp drop in per-class accuracy would falsify the claim of usable generalization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01294 by Alejandro Barrera, Fabio Pizzati, Fernando Garc\'ia, Marco Allodi.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: System overview 2.1 Instance Segmentation As discussed in section 1, several state-of-the-art approaches employ pixelwise classifications in order to differentiate pixels belonging to lane boundaries and background. In our case, different approaches are possible, so several design guidelines have been defined. First of all, we train the CNN to recognize lane boundaries, rather than lane markings. Doing thi… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Descriptors of different sizes The architecture we use for this task is derived from H-Net [11]. A detailed description of its structure is given in image 3. We trained this network separately from the first one. To do that, the TuSimple dataset has been processed by the instance segmentation network. Each detected lane boundary is then compared with the ground truth, and it is associated to the correspo… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Classification Network. Output channels are listed below each layer. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Qualitative results on the test set. From top to bottom: original image, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Lane detection is extremely important for autonomous vehicles. For this reason, many approaches use lane boundary information to locate the vehicle inside the street, or to integrate GPS-based localization. As many other computer vision based tasks, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) represent the state-of-the-art technology to indentify lane boundaries. However, the position of the lane boundaries w.r.t. the vehicle may not suffice for a reliable positioning, as for path planning or localization information regarding lane types may also be needed. In this work, we present an end-to-end system for lane boundary identification, clustering and classification, based on two cascaded neural networks, that runs in real-time. To build the system, 14336 lane boundaries instances of the TuSimple dataset for lane detection have been labelled using 8 different classes. Our dataset and the code for inference are available online.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This applies cascaded CNNs to lane type classification on a relabeled TuSimple set and releases the labels plus code, but reports no metrics or labeling validation.

read the letter

The one thing to know is that the work takes an existing cascaded CNN pipeline for lane detection, adds a second network to classify boundaries into eight types, and releases the 14336 manually labeled instances plus inference code. That is the extent of what is new; the method itself follows prior cascaded approaches without new architecture or theory. The release of the labeled data is the part that could actually help someone else. It addresses a practical gap in autonomous driving where lane position alone is not enough for planning or localization. Releasing both the annotations and the code is the clearest positive step here. The rest of the paper stays at the level of describing the pipeline and stating that it runs in real time. The soft spots are straightforward. The abstract supplies no accuracy figures, no baselines, no error breakdown, and no details on how the eight classes were defined or how the labeling was checked for consistency. The stress-test concern about the manual labels holds up: without any reported protocol, inter-annotator numbers, or quality splits, it is impossible to judge whether the training signal for the classification network is reliable or balanced. The TuSimple source only marks lanes as present or absent, so every class label comes from this new effort. This paper is for engineers who need a working real-time lane system with type information and are willing to start from the released data. It is not aimed at readers looking for methodological advances or rigorous benchmarks. I would not bring it to a reading group. I would not cite it. It does not look ready for serious peer review in its current form because the central claims cannot be checked from the evidence given.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to present an end-to-end real-time system for lane boundary identification, clustering, and classification into 8 types using two cascaded CNNs. It reports manually labeling 14336 lane instances from the TuSimple dataset to train the classification network and states that the dataset and inference code are available online.

Significance. If the empirical claims held with supporting metrics, the work would demonstrate a practical extension of lane detection to include type classification, which could support higher-level tasks such as path planning. The availability of the labeled dataset would also be a positive contribution. However, the complete absence of any performance numbers prevents assessment of whether these benefits are realized.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract and results sections: the manuscript states that the cascaded system 'works and runs in real time' but reports no quantitative metrics (accuracy, F1, IoU, FPS, latency), no validation procedure, no train/test split details, and no error analysis for either network. This directly prevents verification of the central claim.
[Dataset section] Dataset preparation: the manual labeling of 14336 TuSimple instances into 8 classes is presented as the sole source of supervision for the classification head, yet no class definitions, annotation protocol, number of labelers, inter-annotator agreement, or quality-control steps are described. This is load-bearing for the generalization claim of the second network.
[Experiments / Results] Evaluation: no baselines, no comparisons to prior lane-detection or lane-classification methods, and no ablation of the cascaded design versus a single network are provided, leaving the contribution of the two-stage architecture unquantified.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract contains the typo 'indentify' (should be 'identify').
[Dataset section] The 8 lane classes are never enumerated or defined, making it impossible to interpret the classification output.
[Introduction] Related-work discussion of prior cascaded or multi-task lane methods is minimal and lacks specific citations to recent CNN-based lane classifiers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the review and the clear identification of missing elements needed to substantiate the claims. We agree that quantitative evaluation, dataset documentation, and comparative analysis are required for a complete assessment and will revise the manuscript to address these points.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results sections: the manuscript states that the cascaded system 'works and runs in real time' but reports no quantitative metrics (accuracy, F1, IoU, FPS, latency), no validation procedure, no train/test split details, and no error analysis for either network. This directly prevents verification of the central claim.

Authors: We agree the current version lacks the requested quantitative metrics and procedural details. The manuscript will be revised to report accuracy, F1, IoU for detection and classification, FPS and latency measurements, the train/test split used, and a brief error analysis. revision: yes
Referee: [Dataset section] Dataset preparation: the manual labeling of 14336 TuSimple instances into 8 classes is presented as the sole source of supervision for the classification head, yet no class definitions, annotation protocol, number of labelers, inter-annotator agreement, or quality-control steps are described. This is load-bearing for the generalization claim of the second network.

Authors: We will expand the dataset section to define the eight lane classes, describe the annotation protocol and number of labelers, and report any inter-annotator agreement or quality-control measures applied during labeling. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments / Results] Evaluation: no baselines, no comparisons to prior lane-detection or lane-classification methods, and no ablation of the cascaded design versus a single network are provided, leaving the contribution of the two-stage architecture unquantified.

Authors: We acknowledge the absence of baselines and ablations. The revised manuscript will include comparisons against representative prior methods and an ablation study isolating the contribution of the cascaded architecture. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard supervised CNN pipeline on externally labeled data

full rationale

The paper presents a cascaded CNN architecture for lane detection and classification trained via supervised learning on 14336 manually labeled instances from the external TuSimple dataset. No equations, parameters, or claims reduce by construction to self-referential definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The labeling step is an independent manual input, and the system description contains no mathematical derivations that loop back to their own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard CNN architectures and supervised training; the only notable choice is the selection of 8 lane classes for labeling, treated as a modeling decision rather than a fitted parameter.

free parameters (1)

number of lane classes = 8
The authors chose to label data with 8 classes; this is a design choice that structures the classification output.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5678 in / 1194 out tokens · 33861 ms · 2026-05-25T11:08:45.009925+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

In: 2017 ieee intelligent vehicles symposium (iv)

Caltagirone, L., Scheidegger, S., Svensson, L., Wahde, M.: Fast lidar-based road detection using fully convolutional neural networks. In: 2017 ieee intelligent vehicles symposium (iv). (2017) 8 F. Pizzati et al

work page 2017
[2]

In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Bai, M., Mattyus, G., Homayounfar, N., Wang, S., Lakshmikanth, S.K., Urtasun, R.: Deep multi-sensor lane detection. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

Efficient Road Lane Marking Detection with Deep Learning

Chen, P., Lo, S., Hang, H., Chan, S., Lin, J.: Eﬃcient road lane marking detection with deep learning. CoRR abs/1809.03994 (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[4]

Neurocomputing (2018)

Tian, Y., Gelernter, J., Wang, X., Chen, W., Gao, J., Zhang, Y., Li, X.: Lane marking detection via deep convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 28(3) (2017)

Li, J., Mei, X., Prokhorov, D., Tao, D.: Deep neural network for structural pre- diction and lane detection in traﬃc scene. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 28(3) (2017)

work page 2017
[6]

ICCV (2017)

Lee, S., Kim, J.S., Yoon, J.S., Shin, S., Bailo, O., Kim, N., Lee, T.H., Hong, H.S., Han, S.H., Kweon, I.S.: Vpgnet: Vanishing point guided network for lane and road marking detection and recognition. ICCV (2017)

work page 2017
[7]

In: APSIPA ASC, IEEE (2018)

Zang, J., Zhou, W., Zhang, G., Duan, Z.: Traﬃc lane detection using fully convo- lutional neural network. In: APSIPA ASC, IEEE (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

In: Advances in NIPS

Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: Advances in NIPS. (2015)

work page 2015
[9]

Signal, Image and Video Processing 12(6) (Sep 2018) 1133–1140

John, V., Liu, Z., Mita, S., Guo, C., Kidono, K.: Real-time road surface and semantic lane estimation using deep features. Signal, Image and Video Processing 12(6) (Sep 2018) 1133–1140

work page 2018
[10]

In: CVPR

Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: CVPR. (2015) 3431–3440

work page 2015
[11]

In: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), IEEE (2018) 286–291

Neven, D., De Brabandere, B., Georgoulis, S., Proesmans, M., Van Gool, L.: To- wards end-to-end lane detection: an instance segmentation approach. In: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), IEEE (2018) 286–291

work page 2018
[12]

In: 32nd AAAI Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence

Pan, X., Shi, J., Luo, P., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Spatial as deep: Spatial cnn for traﬃc scene understanding. In: 32nd AAAI Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence. (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

In: ECCV

Zhang, J., Xu, Y., Ni, B., Duan, Z.: Geometric constrained joint lane segmentation and lane boundary detection. In: ECCV. (2018) 486–502

work page 2018
[14]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE CVPR Workshops

Kim, J., Park, C.: End-to-end ego lane estimation based on sequential transfer learning for self-driving cars. In: Proceedings of the IEEE CVPR Workshops. (2017)

work page 2017
[15]

In: Reliable Multilane Detection and Classiﬁcation by Utilizing CNN as a Regression Network: Munich, Germany, September 8-14, 2018, Proceedings, Part V

Chougule, S., Koznek, N., Ismail, A., Adam, G., Narayan, V., Schulze, M. In: Reliable Multilane Detection and Classiﬁcation by Utilizing CNN as a Regression Network: Munich, Germany, September 8-14, 2018, Proceedings, Part V

work page 2018
[16]

In: ECCV

Ghafoorian, M., Nugteren, C., Baka, N., Booij, O., Hofmann, M.: El-gan: em- bedding loss driven generative adversarial networks for lane detection. In: ECCV. (2018)

work page 2018
[17]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00293 (2019)

De Brabandere, B., Van Gansbeke, W., Neven, D., Proesmans, M., Van Gool, L.: End-to-end lane detection through diﬀerentiable least-squares ﬁtting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00293 (2019)

work page arXiv 1902
[18]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision

He, K., Gkioxari, G., Doll´ ar, P., Girshick, R.: Mask r-cnn. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. (2017)

work page 2017
[19]

IEEE Transactions on ITS

Romera, E., Alvarez, J.M., Bergasa, L.M., Arroyo, R.: Erfnet: Eﬃcient residual factorized convnet for real-time semantic segmentation. IEEE Transactions on ITS

work page
[20]

(07 2018) 1–8

Hsu, Y.C., Xu, Z., Kira, Z., Huang, J.: Learning to cluster for proposal-free instance segmentation. (07 2018) 1–8

work page 2018
[21]

In: Pro- ceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning

Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., Weston, J.: Curriculum learning. In: Pro- ceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. (2009)

work page 2009

[1] [1]

In: 2017 ieee intelligent vehicles symposium (iv)

Caltagirone, L., Scheidegger, S., Svensson, L., Wahde, M.: Fast lidar-based road detection using fully convolutional neural networks. In: 2017 ieee intelligent vehicles symposium (iv). (2017) 8 F. Pizzati et al

work page 2017

[2] [2]

In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Bai, M., Mattyus, G., Homayounfar, N., Wang, S., Lakshmikanth, S.K., Urtasun, R.: Deep multi-sensor lane detection. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). (2018)

work page 2018

[3] [3]

Efficient Road Lane Marking Detection with Deep Learning

Chen, P., Lo, S., Hang, H., Chan, S., Lin, J.: Eﬃcient road lane marking detection with deep learning. CoRR abs/1809.03994 (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[4] [4]

Neurocomputing (2018)

Tian, Y., Gelernter, J., Wang, X., Chen, W., Gao, J., Zhang, Y., Li, X.: Lane marking detection via deep convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 28(3) (2017)

Li, J., Mei, X., Prokhorov, D., Tao, D.: Deep neural network for structural pre- diction and lane detection in traﬃc scene. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 28(3) (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [6]

ICCV (2017)

Lee, S., Kim, J.S., Yoon, J.S., Shin, S., Bailo, O., Kim, N., Lee, T.H., Hong, H.S., Han, S.H., Kweon, I.S.: Vpgnet: Vanishing point guided network for lane and road marking detection and recognition. ICCV (2017)

work page 2017

[7] [7]

In: APSIPA ASC, IEEE (2018)

Zang, J., Zhou, W., Zhang, G., Duan, Z.: Traﬃc lane detection using fully convo- lutional neural network. In: APSIPA ASC, IEEE (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

In: Advances in NIPS

Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: Advances in NIPS. (2015)

work page 2015

[9] [9]

Signal, Image and Video Processing 12(6) (Sep 2018) 1133–1140

John, V., Liu, Z., Mita, S., Guo, C., Kidono, K.: Real-time road surface and semantic lane estimation using deep features. Signal, Image and Video Processing 12(6) (Sep 2018) 1133–1140

work page 2018

[10] [10]

In: CVPR

Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: CVPR. (2015) 3431–3440

work page 2015

[11] [11]

In: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), IEEE (2018) 286–291

Neven, D., De Brabandere, B., Georgoulis, S., Proesmans, M., Van Gool, L.: To- wards end-to-end lane detection: an instance segmentation approach. In: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), IEEE (2018) 286–291

work page 2018

[12] [12]

In: 32nd AAAI Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence

Pan, X., Shi, J., Luo, P., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Spatial as deep: Spatial cnn for traﬃc scene understanding. In: 32nd AAAI Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence. (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

In: ECCV

Zhang, J., Xu, Y., Ni, B., Duan, Z.: Geometric constrained joint lane segmentation and lane boundary detection. In: ECCV. (2018) 486–502

work page 2018

[14] [14]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE CVPR Workshops

Kim, J., Park, C.: End-to-end ego lane estimation based on sequential transfer learning for self-driving cars. In: Proceedings of the IEEE CVPR Workshops. (2017)

work page 2017

[15] [15]

In: Reliable Multilane Detection and Classiﬁcation by Utilizing CNN as a Regression Network: Munich, Germany, September 8-14, 2018, Proceedings, Part V

Chougule, S., Koznek, N., Ismail, A., Adam, G., Narayan, V., Schulze, M. In: Reliable Multilane Detection and Classiﬁcation by Utilizing CNN as a Regression Network: Munich, Germany, September 8-14, 2018, Proceedings, Part V

work page 2018

[16] [16]

In: ECCV

Ghafoorian, M., Nugteren, C., Baka, N., Booij, O., Hofmann, M.: El-gan: em- bedding loss driven generative adversarial networks for lane detection. In: ECCV. (2018)

work page 2018

[17] [17]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00293 (2019)

De Brabandere, B., Van Gansbeke, W., Neven, D., Proesmans, M., Van Gool, L.: End-to-end lane detection through diﬀerentiable least-squares ﬁtting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00293 (2019)

work page arXiv 1902

[18] [18]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision

He, K., Gkioxari, G., Doll´ ar, P., Girshick, R.: Mask r-cnn. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. (2017)

work page 2017

[19] [19]

IEEE Transactions on ITS

Romera, E., Alvarez, J.M., Bergasa, L.M., Arroyo, R.: Erfnet: Eﬃcient residual factorized convnet for real-time semantic segmentation. IEEE Transactions on ITS

work page

[20] [20]

(07 2018) 1–8

Hsu, Y.C., Xu, Z., Kira, Z., Huang, J.: Learning to cluster for proposal-free instance segmentation. (07 2018) 1–8

work page 2018

[21] [21]

In: Pro- ceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning

Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., Weston, J.: Curriculum learning. In: Pro- ceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. (2009)

work page 2009