pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01515 · v1 · pith:5FNCBCM6new · submitted 2019-06-26 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.IR· cs.LG· cs.NE· stat.ML

Electroencephalogram (EEG) for Delineating Objective Measure of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (Extended Version)

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 15:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.IRcs.LGcs.NEstat.ML
keywords EEGAutism Spectrum DisorderMachine LearningBiomarkerClassificationObjective DiagnosisNeurological Signals
0
0 comments X

The pith

EEG signals can serve as an objective biomarker for autism spectrum disorder when processed by machine learning classifiers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how EEG recordings capture brain activity that differs between children with ASD and those without. It explains that these differences allow machine learning models to classify the condition objectively, which matters because current diagnosis relies on subjective behavioral assessments that can delay treatment. The authors describe various studies using EEG features like power spectral density and connectivity measures fed into classifiers such as SVM and neural networks. This approach aims to enable earlier and more reliable identification of ASD.

Core claim

Autism Spectrum Disorder lacks suitable objective measures for early diagnosis, but EEG measures the electric signals of the brain via scalp electrodes and studies show it has the potential to be used as a biomarker for ASD. Machine learning algorithms can be applied to these EEG signals for the classification of ASD, providing an efficient objective measure to help diagnose the disease as early as possible.

What carries the argument

EEG signal feature extraction combined with machine learning classification algorithms to distinguish ASD from typical development.

If this is right

  • Objective EEG-based classification reduces reliance on time-consuming subjective behavioral assessments.
  • Earlier diagnosis becomes feasible, improving access to long-term treatment for ASD.
  • Fewer false positives and false negatives occur compared to current diagnostic practices.
  • The method supports repeated measurements to track changes over time with less effort.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Portable or wearable EEG systems could extend screening beyond clinical settings if classification holds up.
  • The same EEG-ML pipeline might apply to other developmental or neurological conditions with similar signal differences.
  • Standardizing EEG protocols across studies would be required before widespread clinical adoption.
  • Combining EEG features with other data sources like genetics could raise overall diagnostic reliability.

Load-bearing premise

EEG signals contain consistent, distinguishable patterns specific to ASD that machine learning can reliably detect without being confounded by age, medication, or other neurological conditions.

What would settle it

A large study of age-matched and medication-controlled ASD and control participants where no machine learning model on EEG data exceeds chance-level classification accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01515 by Mark Jaime, Sampath Jayarathna, Sashi Thapaliya, Yasith Jayawardana.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: EEG Processing and Classification Pipeline electrodes and a digital sampling rate of 250 Hz (Brain Products GmbH) for EEG time series acquisition. Use of a wireless EEG system allowed for head movements and the active electrodes increased speed of application thereby increasing probability of successful EEG data acquisition with special populations. All 32 channels were continuously recorded using the FCz … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Superposition plot a of an acquired EEG time series from a subject with autism spectrum disorder, pre-ASR (red) and post-ASR (blue); ICA of the time series b resulting in 24 independent components (ICs). To the left are 3 ICs with respective scalp topographies and activity power spectra. Component IC1 (top) indicates theta, alpha and beta band activity over temporal parietal regions. Components IC15 (middl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: EEG Processing Pipeline for Study 1. and Gaussian Naive Bayes were developed for classification. For the deep neural network, five hidden layers with sigmoid activation function is used (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Layers of the Deep Neural Network. classifiers). For each feature there are three models for each algorithm, two models using Feature Selection and the third one without using any feature selection. For Feature selection PCA and sequential feature selection is used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: EEG Pre-processing and Band Pass Filtering An algorithm was devised to calculate the power matrix for a time series as shown in Algorithm 1. Given Algorithm 1 Power Matrix of an Electrode 1: f ← sampling freq 2: function PowerMatrix(B, S, W, E) 3: F ← BandP ass(B, S) 4: I ← |B| 5: J ← |S|/S/f 6: M ← array[I][J] 7: for all i ← 0, ..(I − 1) do 8: for all j ← 0, ..(J − 1) do 9: M[i][j] ← P(F[i], W, E, j, f) 1… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a illustrates the power matrix of a sample electrode for a TD (typically developing) subject. All values were normalized to the (0 - 255) range for illustration purposes. The X axis represents time scaled (a) Diagnosis - TD (b) Diagnosis - ASD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Aggregate Power Spectrums of all ASD Participants (a) C3 (b) C4 (c) F7 (d) F8 (e) P7 (f) P8 (g) T7 (h) T8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Aggregate Power Spectrums of all TD Participants 3.4.2 Evaluation and Results The power matrices obtained through Frequency Band Decomposition and Wavelet Transforms were used to train several machine learning models. We evaluated both short-term and long-term dependencies between 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the structure of the CNN used for this analysis. The first layer is a 1D Convolution Layer, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Training Progress and the respective change in accuracy and loss metrics across each training epoch. 3.4.3 Discussion Results obtained from short-term and long-term trend analysis shows a high correlation of the EEG data with the human-labeled ASD diagnosis and ADOS-2 scores. A slight boost in accuracy by moving from electrode set 1 to electrode set 2 was achieved by adding 32 − 10 = 22 more electrodes to… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a developmental disorder that often impairs a child's normal development of the brain. According to CDC, it is estimated that 1 in 6 children in the US suffer from development disorders, and 1 in 68 children in the US suffer from ASD. This condition has a negative impact on a person's ability to hear, socialize and communicate. Overall, ASD has a broad range of symptoms and severity; hence the term spectrum is used. One of the main contributors to ASD is known to be genetics. Up to date, no suitable cure for ASD has been found. Early diagnosis is crucial for the long-term treatment of ASD, but this is challenging due to the lack of a proper objective measures. Subjective measures often take more time, resources, and have false positives or false negatives. There is a need for efficient objective measures that can help in diagnosing this disease early as possible with less effort. EEG measures the electric signals of the brain via electrodes placed on various places on the scalp. These signals can be used to study complex neuropsychiatric issues. Studies have shown that EEG has the potential to be used as a biomarker for various neurological conditions including ASD. This chapter will outline the usage of EEG measurement for the classification of ASD using machine learning algorithms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an extended review chapter summarizing literature on EEG as a potential biomarker for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and the use of machine learning algorithms for its classification. It covers ASD prevalence and diagnostic challenges, notes the limitations of subjective measures, and outlines how EEG signals have been studied for objective classification in prior work, with the central claim explicitly hedged as 'has the potential'.

Significance. As a review without new empirical data or derivations, the manuscript could provide a useful synthesis for researchers in biomedical signal processing if the cited studies are accurately represented and the coverage is balanced. The hedged claim aligns with the absence of new validation, reducing the risk of overstatement.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The CDC prevalence statistics (1 in 6 and 1 in 68) are stated without a reference or year; adding a citation would improve verifiability.
  2. Abstract and title: The text refers to itself as a 'chapter' and 'Extended Version'; clarify whether this is intended as a journal article or book chapter and note any differences from the prior version.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the assessment and recommendation of minor revision. The report correctly characterizes the work as an extended review chapter with a hedged central claim. No specific major comments were provided for point-by-point response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review paper with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review chapter that summarizes existing literature on EEG signals as a potential biomarker for ASD and the application of machine learning for classification. Its central claim is hedged as 'has the potential' rather than asserting a new quantitative result. No equations, derivations, parameter fits, predictions of held-out data, or self-citation chains that reduce the argument to its own inputs are present. The text reports on prior studies without introducing original models or self-referential definitions. This is a standard non-finding for a literature review with no load-bearing empirical claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper is a descriptive outline of prior work with no new mathematical models, fitted parameters, or postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5792 in / 864 out tokens · 25178 ms · 2026-05-25T15:49:49.521901+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the united kingdom and the united states

    Ariane VS Buescher, Zuleyha Cidav, Martin Knapp, and David S Mandell. Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the united kingdom and the united states. JAMA pediatrics, 168(8):721–728, 2014

  2. [2]

    Brief report: Forecasting the economic burden of autism in 2015 and 2025 in the united states

    J Paul Leigh and Juan Du. Brief report: Forecasting the economic burden of autism in 2015 and 2025 in the united states. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 45(12):4135–4139, 2015

  3. [3]

    Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder

    Geraldine Dawson. Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder. Development and psychopathology, 20(3):775–803, 2008

  4. [4]

    The autism diagnostic observation schedule: revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity

    Katherine Gotham, Susan Risi, Andrew Pickles, and Catherine Lord. The autism diagnostic observation schedule: revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity. Journal of autism and developmental disorders , 37(4):613, 2007

  5. [5]

    Intentional relations and social understanding

    John Barresi and Chris Moore. Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and brain sciences, 19(1):107– 122, 1996

  6. [6]

    What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy

    George Butterworth and Nicholas Jarrett. What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. British journal of developmental psychology , 9(1):55–72, 1991

  7. [7]

    A parallel and distributed-processing model of joint attention, social cognition and autism

    Peter Mundy, Lisa Sullivan, and Ann M Mastergeorge. A parallel and distributed-processing model of joint attention, social cognition and autism. Autism research, 2(1):2–21, 2009

  8. [8]

    Autism and joint attention: Development, neuroscience, and clinical fundamentals

    Peter C Mundy. Autism and joint attention: Development, neuroscience, and clinical fundamentals . Guilford Publica- tions, 2016

  9. [9]

    A longitudinal study of joint attention and language development in autistic children

    Peter Mundy, Marian Sigman, and Connie Kasari. A longitudinal study of joint attention and language development in autistic children. Journal of Autism and developmental Disorders , 20(1):115–128, 1990

  10. [10]

    Attention, joint attention, and social cognition

    Peter Mundy and Lisa Newell. Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current directions in psychological science, 16(5):269–274, 2007. 17

  11. [11]

    theory of mind

    Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan M Leslie, and Uta Frith. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1):37–46, 1985

  12. [12]

    Specialization of right temporo-parietal junction for mentalizing and its relation to social impairments in autism

    Michael V Lombardo, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Edward T Bullmore, Simon Baron-Cohen, MRC AIMS Consortium, et al. Specialization of right temporo-parietal junction for mentalizing and its relation to social impairments in autism. Neuroimage, 56(3):1832–1838, 2011

  13. [13]

    Understanding autism: insights from mind and brain

    Elisabeth L Hill and Uta Frith. Understanding autism: insights from mind and brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 358(1430):281, 2003

  14. [14]

    Atypical frontal- posterior synchronization of theory of mind regions in autism during mental state attribution

    Rajesh K Kana, Timothy A Keller, Vladimir L Cherkassky, Nancy J Minshew, and Marcel Adam Just. Atypical frontal- posterior synchronization of theory of mind regions in autism during mental state attribution. Social neuroscience, 4(2):135–152, 2009

  15. [15]

    Theory of mind disruption and recruitment of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension in autism

    Robert A Mason, Diane L Williams, Rajesh K Kana, Nancy Minshew, and Marcel Adam Just. Theory of mind disruption and recruitment of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension in autism. Neuropsychologia, 46(1):269–280, 2008

  16. [16]

    The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders

    Daniel P Kennedy and Ralph Adolphs. The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(11):559–572, 2012

  17. [17]

    Look at this: the neural correlates of initiating and responding to bids for joint attention

    Elizabeth Redcay, Mario Kleiner, and Rebecca Saxe. Look at this: the neural correlates of initiating and responding to bids for joint attention. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6:169, 2012

  18. [18]

    Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies

    Matthias Schurz, Joaquim Radua, Markus Aichhorn, Fabio Richlan, and Josef Perner. Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42:9–34, 2014

  19. [19]

    Shared neural circuits for mentalizing about the self and others

    Michael V Lombardo, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Edward T Bullmore, Sally J Wheelwright, Susan A Sadek, John Suckling, MRC Aims Consortium, and Simon Baron-Cohen. Shared neural circuits for mentalizing about the self and others. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(7):1623–1635, 2010

  20. [20]

    A frontotemporoparietal network common to initiating and responding to joint attention bids

    Nathan Caruana, Jon Brock, and Alexandra Woolgar. A frontotemporoparietal network common to initiating and responding to joint attention bids. Neuroimage, 108:34–46, 2015

  21. [21]

    Eeg power and coherence in autistic spectrum disorder

    Robert Coben, Adam R Clarke, William Hudspeth, and Robert J Barry. Eeg power and coherence in autistic spectrum disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(5):1002–1009, 2008

  22. [22]

    Cortical activation and synchroniza- tion during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: evidence of underconnectivity

    Marcel Adam Just, Vladimir L Cherkassky, Timothy A Keller, and Nancy J Minshew. Cortical activation and synchroniza- tion during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: evidence of underconnectivity. Brain, 127(8):1811–1821, 2004

  23. [23]

    Functional and anatomical cortical underconnectivity in autism: evidence from an fmri study of an executive function task and corpus callosum morphometry

    Marcel Adam Just, Vladimir L Cherkassky, Timothy A Keller, Rajesh K Kana, and Nancy J Minshew. Functional and anatomical cortical underconnectivity in autism: evidence from an fmri study of an executive function task and corpus callosum morphometry. Cerebral cortex, 17(4):951–961, 2006

  24. [24]

    Brain connectivity in autism

    Rajesh K Kana, Lucina Q Uddin, Tal Kenet, Diane Chugani, and Ralph-Axel M¨ uller. Brain connectivity in autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8:349, 2014

  25. [25]

    Functional connectivity in an fmri working memory task in high-functioning autism

    Hideya Koshino, Patricia A Carpenter, Nancy J Minshew, Vladimir L Cherkassky, Timothy A Keller, and Marcel Adam Just. Functional connectivity in an fmri working memory task in high-functioning autism. Neuroimage, 24(3):810–821, 2005

  26. [26]

    fmri investigation of working memory for faces in autism: visual coding and underconnectivity with frontal areas.Cerebral cortex, 18(2):289–300, 2007

    Hideya Koshino, Rajesh K Kana, Timothy A Keller, Vladimir L Cherkassky, Nancy J Minshew, and Marcel Adam Just. fmri investigation of working memory for faces in autism: visual coding and underconnectivity with frontal areas.Cerebral cortex, 18(2):289–300, 2007

  27. [27]

    Reduced interhemispheric connectivity in childhood autism detected by electroencephalographic photic driving coherence

    Vladimir V Lazarev, Adailton Pontes, Andrey A Mitrofanov, et al. Reduced interhemispheric connectivity in childhood autism detected by electroencephalographic photic driving coherence. Journal of autism and developmental disorders , 45(2):537–547, 2015

  28. [28]

    Default mode network in childhood autism: posteromedial cortex heterogeneity and relationship with social deficits

    Charles J Lynch, Lucina Q Uddin, Kaustubh Supekar, Amirah Khouzam, Jennifer Phillips, and Vinod Menon. Default mode network in childhood autism: posteromedial cortex heterogeneity and relationship with social deficits. Biological psychiatry, 74(3):212–219, 2013

  29. [29]

    Salience network–based classification and prediction of symptom severity in children with autism

    Lucina Q Uddin, Kaustubh Supekar, Charles J Lynch, Amirah Khouzam, Jennifer Phillips, Carl Feinstein, Srikanth Ryali, and Vinod Menon. Salience network–based classification and prediction of symptom severity in children with autism. JAMA psychiatry, 70(8):869–879, 2013

  30. [30]

    Atypical network connectivity for imitation in autism spectrum disorder

    Patricia Shih, Mark Shen, Birgit ¨Ottl, Brandon Keehn, Michael S Gaffrey, and Ralph-Axel M¨ uller. Atypical network connectivity for imitation in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 48(10):2931–2939, 2010

  31. [31]

    Aberrant functional connectivity in autism: evidence from low-frequency bold signal fluctuations

    Sarah K Noonan, Frank Haist, and Ralph-Axel M¨ uller. Aberrant functional connectivity in autism: evidence from low-frequency bold signal fluctuations. Brain research, 1262:48–63, 2009

  32. [32]

    Sources of group differences in functional connectivity: an investigation applied to autism spectrum disorder

    Tyler B Jones, Peter A Bandettini, Lauren Kenworthy, Laura K Case, Shawn C Milleville, Alex Martin, and Rasmus M Birn. Sources of group differences in functional connectivity: an investigation applied to autism spectrum disorder. Neuroimage, 49(1):401–414, 2010

  33. [33]

    Cortical underconnectivity coupled with preserved visuospatial cognition in autism: Evidence from an fmri study of an embedded figures task

    Saudamini Roy Damarla, Timothy A Keller, Rajesh K Kana, Vladimir L Cherkassky, Diane L Williams, Nancy J Minshew, and Marcel Adam Just. Cortical underconnectivity coupled with preserved visuospatial cognition in autism: Evidence from an fmri study of an embedded figures task. Autism Research, 3(5):273–279, 2010. 18

  34. [34]

    Brain connectivity in autism spectrum disorder

    Iman Mohammad-Rezazadeh, Joel Frohlich, Sandra K Loo, and Shafali S Jeste. Brain connectivity in autism spectrum disorder. Current opinion in neurology , 29(2):137, 2016

  35. [35]

    Autism, asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes

    Fulvia Castelli, Chris Frith, Francesca Happ´ e, and Uta Frith. Autism, asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(8):1839–1849, 2002

  36. [36]

    Abnormal functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders during face processing

    Natalia M Kleinhans, Todd Richards, Lindsey Sterling, Keith C Stegbauer, Roderick Mahurin, L Clark Johnson, Jessica Greenson, Geraldine Dawson, and Elizabeth Aylward. Abnormal functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders during face processing. Brain, 131(4):1000–1012, 2008

  37. [37]

    Reduced functional integration and segregation of distributed neural systems underlying social and emotional information processing in autism spectrum disorders

    Jeffrey D Rudie, Zarrar Shehzad, Leanna M Hernandez, Natalie L Colich, Susan Y Bookheimer, Marco Iacoboni, and Mirella Dapretto. Reduced functional integration and segregation of distributed neural systems underlying social and emotional information processing in autism spectrum disorders. Cerebral Cortex, 22(5):1025–1037, 2011

  38. [38]

    Functional disconnectivity of the medial temporal lobe in asperger’s syndrome.Biological psychiatry, 57(9):991–998, 2005

    David E Welchew, Chris Ashwin, Karim Berkouk, Raymond Salvador, John Suckling, Simon Baron-Cohen, and Ed Bull- more. Functional disconnectivity of the medial temporal lobe in asperger’s syndrome.Biological psychiatry, 57(9):991–998, 2005

  39. [39]

    Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism

    Brandon Keehn, Ralph-Axel M¨ uller, and Jeanne Townsend. Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(2):164–183, 2013

  40. [40]

    Minds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry

    Leonhard Schilbach, Marcus Wilms, Simon B Eickhoff, Sandro Romanzetti, Ralf Tepest, Gary Bente, N Jon Shah, Gereon R Fink, and Kai Vogeley. Minds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(12):2702–2715, 2010

  41. [41]

    Social, reward, and attention brain networks are involved when online bids for joint attention are met with congruent versus incongruent responses

    Ilanit Gordon, Jeffrey A Eilbott, Ruth Feldman, Kevin A Pelphrey, and Brent C Vander Wyk. Social, reward, and attention brain networks are involved when online bids for joint attention are met with congruent versus incongruent responses. Social neuroscience, 8(6):544–554, 2013

  42. [42]

    Predicting social impairment and asd diagnosis in younger siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder

    Paul Yoder, Wendy L Stone, Tedra Walden, and Elizabeth Malesa. Predicting social impairment and asd diagnosis in younger siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders , 39(10):1381– 1391, 2009

  43. [43]

    The development of referential communication and autism symptomatology in high-risk infants

    Lisa V Iba˜ nez, Caroline J Grantz, and Daniel S Messinger. The development of referential communication and autism symptomatology in high-risk infants. Infancy, 18(5):687–707, 2013

  44. [44]

    Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy

    Peter Mundy, Jessica Block, Christine Delgado, Yuly Pomares, Amy Vaughan Van Hecke, and Meaghan Venezia Parlade. Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy. Child development, 78(3):938–954, 2007

  45. [45]

    Defining the social deficits of autism: The contribution of non-verbal communication measures

    Peter Mundy, Marian Sigman, Judy Ungerer, and Tracy Sherman. Defining the social deficits of autism: The contribution of non-verbal communication measures. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry , 27(5):657–669, 1986

  46. [46]

    Social attention in ASD: A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies

    Meia Chita-Tegmark. Social attention in ASD: A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies. Research in Develop- mental Disabilities, 48:79 – 93, 2016

  47. [47]

    Visual social attention in autism spectrum disorder: Insights from eye tracking studies

    Quentin Guillon, Nouchine Hadjikhani, Sophie Baduel, and Bernadette Rog´ e. Visual social attention in autism spectrum disorder: Insights from eye tracking studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42:279 – 297, 2014

  48. [48]

    Denver, and Stephen W

    Elgiz Bal, Emily Harden, Damon Lamb, Amy Vaughan Van Hecke, John W. Denver, and Stephen W. Porges. Emotion Recognition in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Relations to Eye Gaze and Autonomic State. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 40(3):358–370, March 2010

  49. [49]

    Black, Nigel T

    Melissa H. Black, Nigel T. M. Chen, Kartik K. Iyer, Ottmar V. Lipp, Sven B¨ olte, Marita Falkmer, Tele Tan, and Sonya Girdler. Mechanisms of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: Insights from eye tracking and electroencephalography. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80:488 – 515, 2017

  50. [50]

    Alyssa C. P. Sawyer, Paul Williamson, and Robyn L. Young. Can Gaze Avoidance Explain Why Individuals with As- perger’s Syndrome Can’t Recognise Emotions From Facial Expressions? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(4):606–618, April 2012

  51. [51]

    Sasson, Amy E

    Noah J. Sasson, Amy E. Pinkham, Lauren P. Weittenhiller, Daniel J. Faso, and Claire Simpson. Context Effects on Facial Affect Recognition in Schizophrenia and Autism: Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Evidence. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42(3):675–683, 2016

  52. [52]

    Eye-tracking study on facial emotion recognition tasks in individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders

    Vicky Tsang. Eye-tracking study on facial emotion recognition tasks in individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 22(2):161–170, 2018

  53. [53]

    Wagner, Rhiannon J

    Jennifer B. Wagner, Rhiannon J. Luyster, Helen Tager-Flusberg, and Charles A. Nelson. Greater Pupil Size in Response to Emotional Faces as an Early Marker of Social-Communicative Difficulties in Infants at High Risk for Autism. Infancy, 21(5):560–581, 2016

  54. [54]

    Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski and Susan W. White. Eye-Gaze Analysis of Facial Emotion Recognition and Expression in Adolescents with ASD. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology , 46(1):110–124, 2017

  55. [55]

    Development of online use of theory of mind during adolescence: An eye-tracking study

    Irene Symeonidou, Iroise Dumontheil, Wing-Yee Chow, and Richard Breheny. Development of online use of theory of mind during adolescence: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 149:81 – 97, 2016

  56. [56]

    Johnson, and the BASIS team

    Rachael Bedford, Mayada Elsabbagh, Teodora Gliga, Andrew Pickles, Atsushi Senju, Tony Charman, Mark H. Johnson, and the BASIS team. Precursors to Social and Communication Difficulties in Infants At-Risk for Autism: Gaze Following and Attentional Engagement. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 42(10):2208–2218, October 2012. 19

  57. [57]

    Disentangling the initiation from the response in joint attention: an eye-tracking study in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders

    L Billeci, A Narzisi, G Campatelli, G Crifaci, S Calderoni, A Gagliano, C Calzone, C Colombi, G Pioggia, F Muratori, ALERT group, Rossella Raso, Liliana Ruta, Ilaria Rossi, Agnese Ballarani, Francesca Fulceri, Alessandra Darini, Emilia Maroscia, Caterina Lattarulo, Gaetano Tortorella, Rosamaria Siracusano, and Valentina Comminiello. Disentangling the init...

  58. [58]

    Gaze Performance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder when Observing Communicative Actions

    Terje Falck-Ytter, Elisabeth Fernell, \AAsa Lundholm Hedvall, Claes von Hofsten, and Christopher Gillberg. Gaze Performance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder when Observing Communicative Actions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 42(10):2236–2245, October 2012

  59. [59]

    Brief Report: Lack of Processing Bias for the Objects Other People Attend to in 3-Year-Olds with Autism

    Terje Falck-Ytter, Emilia Thorup, and Sven B¨ olte. Brief Report: Lack of Processing Bias for the Objects Other People Attend to in 3-Year-Olds with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 45(6):1897–1904, June 2015

  60. [60]

    Swanson, Gayle C

    Meghan R. Swanson, Gayle C. Serlin, and Michael Siller. Broad Autism Phenotype in Typically Developing Children Predicts Performance on an Eye-Tracking Measure of Joint Attention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 43(3):707–718, March 2013

  61. [61]

    Altered gaze following during live interaction in infants at risk for autism: an eye tracking study

    Emilia Thorup, P¨ ar Nystr¨ om, Gustaf Gredeb¨ ack, Sven B¨ olte, Terje Falck-Ytter, and The EASE Team. Altered gaze following during live interaction in infants at risk for autism: an eye tracking study. Molecular Autism, 7(1):12, January 2016

  62. [62]

    Reduced Alternating Gaze During Social Interaction in Infancy is Associated with Elevated Symptoms of Autism in Toddlerhood

    Emilia Thorup, P¨ ar Nystr¨ om, Gustaf Gredeb¨ ack, Sven B¨ olte, Terje Falck-Ytter, and the EASE Team. Reduced Alternating Gaze During Social Interaction in Infancy is Associated with Elevated Symptoms of Autism in Toddlerhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology , 46(7):1547–1561, October 2018

  63. [63]

    Giacomo Vivanti, Peter A. J. Fanning, Darren R. Hocking, Stephanie Sievers, and Cheryl Dissanayake. Social Attention, Joint Attention and Sustained Attention in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Williams Syndrome: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 47(6):1866–1877, June 2017

  64. [64]

    2d linear oculomotor plant mathematical model: Verification and biometric applications

    Oleg Komogortsev, Corey Holland, Sampath Jayarathna, and Alex Karpov. 2d linear oculomotor plant mathematical model: Verification and biometric applications. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) , 10(4):27, 2013

  65. [65]

    Duchowski, Sophie J¨ org, Tyler N

    Andrew T. Duchowski, Sophie J¨ org, Tyler N. Allen, Ioannis Giannopoulos, and Krzysztof Krejtz. Eye movement synthesis. In Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, Etra ’16, pages 147–154, New York, NY, 2016. Acm

  66. [66]

    Duchowski, Izabela Krejtz, Agnieszka Szarkowska, and Agata Kopacz

    Krzysztof Krejtz, Andrew T. Duchowski, Izabela Krejtz, Agnieszka Szarkowska, and Agata Kopacz. Discerning ambi- ent/focal attention with coefficient ∥. Transactions on Applied Perception, 13(3), 2016

  67. [67]

    Frazier, Eric W

    Thomas W. Frazier, Eric W. Klingemier, Sumit Parikh, Leslie Speer, Mark S. Strauss, Charis Eng, Antonio Y. Hardan, and Eric A. Youngstrom. Development and Validation of Objective and Quantitative Eye Tracking-Based Measures of Autism Risk and Symptom Levels. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , 57(11):858 – 866, 2018

  68. [68]

    McCracken, Eric Hollander, Frederick Shic, Jana Noeldeke, Lauren Boak, Omar Khwaja, Shamil Sadikhov, Paulo Fontoura, and Daniel Umbricht

    Marta Del Valle Rubido, James T. McCracken, Eric Hollander, Frederick Shic, Jana Noeldeke, Lauren Boak, Omar Khwaja, Shamil Sadikhov, Paulo Fontoura, and Daniel Umbricht. In Search of Biomarkers for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autism Research, 11(11):1567–1579, 2018

  69. [69]

    Eye-movement patterns are associated with communicative competence in autistic spectrum disorders

    Courtenay Frazier Norbury, Jon Brock, Lucy Cragg, Shiri Einav, Helen Griffiths, and Kate Nation. Eye-movement patterns are associated with communicative competence in autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(7):834–842, 2009

  70. [70]

    Hotier, F

    S. Hotier, F. Leroy, J. Boisgontier, C. Laidi, J.-F. Mangin, R. Delorme, F. Bolognani, C. Czech, C. Bouquet, E. Toledano, M. Bouvard, J. Petit, M. Mishchenko, M.-A. d’Albis, D. Gras, A. Gaman, I. Scheid, M. Leboyer, T. Zalla, and J. Houenou. Social cognition in autism is associated with the neurodevelopment of the posterior superior temporal sulcus. Acta ...

  71. [71]

    Resting state eeg abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders

    Jun Wang, Jamie Barstein, Lauren E Ethridge, Matthew W Mosconi, Yukari Takarae, and John A Sweeney. Resting state eeg abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders , 5(1):24, 2013

  72. [72]

    Eye-movements reveal attention to social information in autism spectrum disorder

    Sue Fletcher-Watson, Susan R Leekam, Valerie Benson, MC Frank, and JM Findlay. Eye-movements reveal attention to social information in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 47(1):248–257, 2009

  73. [73]

    Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion

    Ami Klin, David J Lin, Phillip Gorrindo, Gordon Ramsay, and Warren Jones. Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459(7244):257, 2009

  74. [74]

    Diagnosis of autism through eeg processed by advanced computa- tional algorithms: A pilot study

    Enzo Grossi, Chiara Olivieri, and Massimo Buscema. Diagnosis of autism through eeg processed by advanced computa- tional algorithms: A pilot study. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine , 142:73–79, 2017

  75. [75]

    Eeg complexity as a biomarker for autism spectrum disorder risk

    William Bosl, Adrienne Tierney, Helen Tager-Flusberg, and Charles Nelson. Eeg complexity as a biomarker for autism spectrum disorder risk. BMC medicine, 9(1):18, 2011

  76. [76]

    Frequency 3d mapping and inter-channel stability of eeg intrinsic function pulsation: Indicators towards autism spectrum diagnosis

    Enas Abdulhay, Maha Alafeef, Hikmat Hadoush, Natheer Alomari, et al. Frequency 3d mapping and inter-channel stability of eeg intrinsic function pulsation: Indicators towards autism spectrum diagnosis. In Electrical and Electronics Engineering Conference (JIEEEC), 2017 10th Jordanian International , pages 1–6. Ieee, 2017

  77. [77]

    Analysis of eye gaze pattern of infants at risk of autism spectrum disorder using markov models

    David Alie, Mohammad H Mahoor, Whitney I Mattson, Daniel R Anderson, and Daniel S Messinger. Analysis of eye gaze pattern of infants at risk of autism spectrum disorder using markov models. In Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2011 IEEE Workshop on , pages 282–287. Ieee, 2011. 20

  78. [78]

    Efficient autism spectrum disorder prediction with eye movement: A machine learning framework

    Wenbo Liu, Xhiding Yu, Bhiksha Raj, Li Yi, Xiaobing Zou, and Ming Li. Efficient autism spectrum disorder prediction with eye movement: A machine learning framework. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2015 International Conference on, pages 649–655. Ieee, 2015

  79. [79]

    Learning visual attention to identify people with autism spectrum disorder

    Ming Jiang and Qi Zhao. Learning visual attention to identify people with autism spectrum disorder. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 3267–3276, 2017

  80. [80]

    Brain structural abnormalities in young children with autism spectrum disorder

    BF Sparks, SD Friedman, DW Shaw, EH Aylward, D Echelard, AA Artru, KR Maravilla, JN Giedd, J Munson, G Dawson, et al. Brain structural abnormalities in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Neurology, 59(2):184–192, 2002

Showing first 80 references.