pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01763 · v1 · pith:JYLJCEJQnew · submitted 2019-07-03 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Photo-absorption on deuteron contributed by d^*(2380) resonance

Yubing Dong , Pengnian Shen , Zoneye Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 09:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords photo-absorptiondeuterond*(2380) resonancesix-quark systemelectromagnetic transitionDelta Delta component
0
0 comments X

The pith

The d*(2380) resonance contributes a photo-absorption cross section on deuteron of only about 10 nb, twenty times smaller than recent measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the real photo-absorption cross section on the deuteron arising from the d*(2380) resonance. It models the resonance as a compact six-quark system composed mainly of ΔΔ and hidden-color C8C8 clusters. In this picture only next-to-leading-order terms enter the electromagnetic transition amplitude for γ + d → d*(2380). The resulting cross section is found to be on the order of 10 nb. This value lies roughly a factor of twenty below the data reported by the ELPH and Mainz experiments.

Core claim

In the compact six-quark interpretation of d*(2380) with dominant ΔΔ and C8C8 components, the electromagnetic transition amplitude γ + d → d*(2380) receives contributions only from next-to-leading terms, yielding a photo-absorption cross section of order 10 nb that is approximately twenty times smaller than the measured values at ELPH and Mainz.

What carries the argument

The electromagnetic transition amplitude γ + d → d*(2380) evaluated in the compact six-quark model with ΔΔ and C8C8 components, restricted to next-to-leading-order terms.

If this is right

  • The resonance contributes negligibly to the total photo-absorption cross section on the deuteron.
  • Photo-production of d*(2380) is suppressed relative to other channels in electromagnetic processes.
  • The small cross section is a direct consequence of the compact six-quark structure assumed for the resonance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the measured cross sections remain large, alternative structures for d*(2380) such as loosely bound molecular states would need to be considered.
  • The result points to the need for other production mechanisms, such as hadronic collisions, to study the resonance.

Load-bearing premise

The d*(2380) is a compact six-quark state whose wave function contains mainly ΔΔ and hidden-color C8C8 clusters, so that only next-to-leading electromagnetic terms survive in the transition.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the γd → d*(2380) photo-absorption cross section near the resonance energy that is significantly larger than 10 nb would falsify the calculation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01763 by Pengnian Shen, Yubing Dong, Zoneye Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Feynman diagrams for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Total photon-absorption cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In order to understand the possible physical nature of the newly observed resonance $d^*(2380)$, we calculate the real photo-absorption cross section on deuteron contributed by the resonance $d^*(2380)$ by considering the electromagnetic transition amplitude of $\gamma +d\rightarrow d^*(2380)$. In our interpretation, the $d^*(2380)$ is regarded as a compact six-quark system with mainly two components of $\Delta\Delta$ and hidden-color clusters $C_8C_8$. We find that only the next-to-leading terms contribute the $\gamma +d\rightarrow d^*(2380)$ and the obtained photo-absorption cross section is quite small which is in the order of 10 $nb$. Compared with data measured at ELPH and Mainz recently, it is almost about 20 times smaller.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the real photo-absorption cross section on the deuteron arising from the d*(2380) resonance. Modeling d*(2380) as a compact six-quark system dominated by ΔΔ and hidden-color C8C8 components, the authors state that leading electromagnetic transition operators between the deuteron and d* wave functions vanish, so that only next-to-leading-order terms survive; this yields a cross section of order 10 nb, stated to be approximately 20 times smaller than recent ELPH and Mainz data.

Significance. If the suppression result holds, the work would furnish a concrete, falsifiable prediction supporting the compact six-quark interpretation of d*(2380) and would explain why the resonance contributes only weakly to deuteron photo-absorption. The factor-of-20 discrepancy with existing data would then constitute a sharp test of the model assumptions rather than an immediate contradiction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (and modeling section)] The headline numerical claim (cross section ~10 nb) rests entirely on the assertion that only NLO terms contribute to the γ + d → d*(2380) amplitude. The manuscript supplies neither the explicit form of the leading electromagnetic operators nor the color-spin-flavor overlap integrals that are said to make those operators vanish for the adopted ΔΔ + C8C8 wave functions; without this demonstration the suppression factor cannot be verified and the result is not reproducible from the given information.
  2. [Abstract] No derivation steps, explicit transition-amplitude formulas, integration measures, or uncertainty estimates accompany the stated 10 nb value. Consequently the factor-of-20 discrepancy with ELPH/Mainz data cannot be assessed for robustness against reasonable variations in the resonance parameters or wave-function normalizations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful assessment and the opportunity to strengthen the presentation of our results. The comments correctly identify that the abstract and modeling discussion do not supply sufficient explicit detail for independent verification of the operator suppression and the numerical cross-section value. We respond point by point below and will revise the manuscript to address these issues.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (and modeling section)] The headline numerical claim (cross section ~10 nb) rests entirely on the assertion that only NLO terms contribute to the γ + d → d*(2380) amplitude. The manuscript supplies neither the explicit form of the leading electromagnetic operators nor the color-spin-flavor overlap integrals that are said to make those operators vanish for the adopted ΔΔ + C8C8 wave functions; without this demonstration the suppression factor cannot be verified and the result is not reproducible from the given information.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit forms of the leading electromagnetic operators and the color-spin-flavor overlap integrals demonstrating their vanishing must be shown for reproducibility. The modeling section of the manuscript relies on symmetry arguments arising from the ΔΔ and hidden-color C8C8 components, but these arguments are presented at a summary level without the explicit operator expressions or overlap integrals. We will add the missing explicit operators, the relevant overlap calculations, and the demonstration that leading terms vanish in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No derivation steps, explicit transition-amplitude formulas, integration measures, or uncertainty estimates accompany the stated 10 nb value. Consequently the factor-of-20 discrepancy with ELPH/Mainz data cannot be assessed for robustness against reasonable variations in the resonance parameters or wave-function normalizations.

    Authors: The 10 nb estimate is obtained by evaluating the squared NLO amplitude with the adopted resonance parameters and integrating over the two-body phase space. We acknowledge that the abstract (and the current manuscript) does not include the explicit transition-amplitude formulas, integration measures, or uncertainty estimates. In the revision we will supply the full amplitude expressions, the phase-space integration details, and a brief assessment of sensitivity to reasonable variations in the d*(2380) width and wave-function normalizations so that the robustness of the factor-of-20 discrepancy can be judged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper calculates the real photo-absorption cross section contributed by d*(2380) under an explicit model assumption that the resonance is a compact six-quark state dominated by ΔΔ and C8C8 components. The abstract states that this leads to only next-to-leading terms contributing to the γ + d → d*(2380) amplitude and yields a cross section of order 10 nb. This is a direct model computation of a new observable rather than any reduction of the reported cross section to previously fitted quantities by construction. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are quoted that would make the numerical result tautological or statistically forced. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a theoretical evaluation within the stated framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents identification of explicit free parameters or axioms; the central claim rests on the six-quark interpretation of d* and the truncation to next-to-leading electromagnetic terms, both introduced without independent evidence in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5669 in / 1082 out tokens · 39537 ms · 2026-05-25T09:57:47.068767+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    After that, a series of experimental studies for d∗ was carried out in the analysis of ABC effect by CELSIUS/W ASA and W ASA@COSY Collaborations [1–4]. Various double- pion and single-pion decays, including invariant mass spectra, Dalitz plots, Argon plots, in the pn and pA reactions, the analyzing power of the neutron-proton scattering and etc., have been...

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    15 GeV has been carried out in the Research Center for Electron Ph oton Sciences (ELPH) at Tohoku University, Japan, and the new data on dibaryon were re leased

    55 ∼ 1. 15 GeV has been carried out in the Research Center for Electron Ph oton Sciences (ELPH) at Tohoku University, Japan, and the new data on dibaryon were re leased. It is shown that a signal of the d∗ (2380) state with the width of 70 MeV was clearly exhibited in the mass spectrum of π 0π 0d, and the corresponding cross section at this resonant point...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Bashkanov et al., Phys

    M. Bashkanov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 052301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Adlarson et al

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 242302 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Adlarson et al

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 721, 229 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Adlarson et al

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, no. 20, 202301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Clement, Prog

    H. Clement, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 195 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rept. 639, 1 (2016). 13

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meissner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B . S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Y. Dong, A. Faessler and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Prog. Part. N ucl. Phys. 94 (2017) 282

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    X. Q. Yuan et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, 045203 (1999)

    work page 1999

  12. [12]

    Bashkanov, Stanley J

    M. Bashkanov, Stanley J. Brodsky, and H. Clement, Phys. Lett. B 727, 438 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Huang, Z

    F. Huang, Z. Y. Zhang, P. N. Shen and W. L. Wang, Chin. Phys . C 39, no. 7, 071001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Huang, P

    F. Huang, P. N. Shen, Y. B. Dong and Z. Y. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 59, no. 2, 622002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Yubing Dong, Pengnian Shen, Fei Huang, and Zongye Zhang , Phys. Rev. C 91, 064002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Yubing Dong, Fei Huang, Pengnian Shen, and Zongye Zhang , Phys. Rev. C 94, 014003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Yubing Dong, Fei Huang, Pengian Shen, and Zongye Zhang, Chinese Physics C 41 (2017) 101001

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Yubing Dong, Fei Huang, Pengnian Shen, and Zongye Zhang , Phys. Lett. B769 (2017), 223-226

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    J. L. Ping, H. X. Huang, H. R. Pang, F. Wang and C. W. Wong, P hys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 024001

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Huang, J

    H. Huang, J. Ping and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 89, no. 3, 035201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    The W ASA-at-COSY Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017), 599-607

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Gal, Phys

    A. Gal, Phys. Lett. B 769, 436 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Gal and H

    A. Gal and H. Garcilazo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 172301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Gal and H

    A. Gal and H. Garcilazo, Nucl. Phys. A 928, 73 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    M. N. Platonova and V. I. Kukulin, Nucl. Phys. A 946, 117 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    M. N. Platonova and V. I. Kukulin, Phys. Rev. C 87, no. 2, 025202 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Y. Dong, F. Huang, P. Shen and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.9, 094001

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Y. Dong, P. Shen and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 97, no. 11, 114002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    C. Y. L, P. Wang, Y. B. Dong, P. N. Shen and Z. Y. Zhang, Phys . Rev. D 99, no. 3, 036015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Dong and P

    Y. Dong and P. Shen, Chin. Phys. C 43, no. 5, 054102 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    F. E. Close and Z. P. Li, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2194 (1990)

    work page 1990

  32. [32]

    Z. P. Li and F. E. Close, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2207 (1990)

    work page 1990

  33. [33]

    M. M. Giannini, Rept. Prog. Phys. 54, 453 (1991)

    work page 1991

  34. [34]

    Capstick, Phys

    S. Capstick, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 1965

    work page 1992

  35. [35]

    Capstick, Phys

    S. Capstick, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2864

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    Pascalutsa, M

    V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen and S. N. Yang, Phys. Re pt. 437, 125 (2007)

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Santopinto and M

    E. Santopinto and M. M. Giannini, Phys. Rev. C 86, 065202 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Warns, W

    M. Warns, W. Pfeil and H. Rollnik, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2215 (1990)

    work page 1990

  39. [39]

    Warns, H

    M. Warns, H. Schroder, W. Pfeil and H. Rollnik, Z. Phys. C 45, 627 (1990)

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    Bijker, F

    R. Bijker, F. Iachello and A. Leviatan,

    work page

  41. [41]

    Ferraris, M

    M. Ferraris, M. M. Giannini, M. Pizzo, E. Santopinto and L. Tiator, Phys. Lett. B 364, 231 (1995)

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    Y. B. Dong, K. Shimizu and A. Faessler, Nucl. Phys. A 689, 889 (2001)

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    W. T. Chiang, S. N. Yang, L. Tiator and D. Drechsel, Nucl. Phys. A 700, 429 (2002)

    work page 2002

  44. [44]

    S. S. Kamalov, G. Y. Chen, S. N. Yang, D. Drechsel and L. Ti ator, Phys. Lett. B 522, 27 (2001)

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    S. N. Yang, J. Phys. G 11, L205 (1985)

    work page 1985

  46. [46]

    S. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. C 40, 1810 (1989) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. C 43, 2455 (1991)]

    work page 1989

  47. [47]

    Nozawa and T

    S. Nozawa and T. S. H. Lee, Nucl. Phys. A 513, 511 (1990)

    work page 1990

  48. [48]

    Stoler, Phys

    P. Stoler, Phys. Rept. 226, 103 (1993)

    work page 1993

  49. [49]

    L. M. Stuart et al. , Phys. Rev. D 58, 032003 (1998)

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    Y. B. Dong, Phys. Rev. C 56, 702 (1997)

    work page 1997

  51. [51]

    Drechsel and L

    D. Drechsel and L. Tiator, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54, 69 (2004)

    work page 2004

  52. [52]

    Theory Support for the Excited Baryon Program at the Jlab 12 GeV Upgrade

    I. Aznauryan et al. , arXiv:0907.1901 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  53. [53]

    MacCormick et al

    M. MacCormick et al. , Phys. Rev. C 53, 41 (1996)

    work page 1996

  54. [54]

    MacCormick et al

    M. MacCormick et al. , Phys. Rev. C 55, 1033 (1997)

    work page 1997

  55. [55]

    Bianchi et al

    N. Bianchi et al. , Phys. Lett. B 325, 333 (1994)

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    Bianchi et al

    N. Bianchi et al. , Phys. Rev. C 54, 1688 (1996)

    work page 1996

  57. [57]

    R. A. Arndt, W. J. Briscoe, I. I. Strakovsky and R. L. Work man, Phys. Rev. C 72, 058203 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Bashkanov, D

    M. Bashkanov, D. P. Watts and A. Pastore, arXiv:1905.00 713 [nucl-th]

    work page 1905

  59. [59]

    Y. W. Yu, Z. Y. Zhang, P. N. Shen and L. R. Dai, Phys. Rev. C 52, 3393 (1995)

    work page 1995

  60. [60]

    Z. Y. Zhang, Y. W. Yu, P. N. Shen, L. R. Dai, A. Faessler and U. Straub, Nucl. Phys. A 625, 59 (1997)

    work page 1997

  61. [61]

    Wildermuth and Y

    K. Wildermuth and Y. C. Tang, ”A unified theory of the nucl eus”, Academic Press, 1977

    work page 1977

  62. [62]

    Oka and K

    M. Oka and K. Yazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 572 (1981)

    work page 1981

  63. [63]

    Faessler, F

    A. Faessler, F. Fernandez, G. Lubeck and K. Shimizu, Nuc l. Phys. A 402, 555 (1983)

    work page 1983

  64. [64]

    Lacombe, B

    M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, R. Vinh Mau, P. Demetriou, J. P. B . C. de Melo and C. Semay, Phys. Rev. C 65, 034004 (2002). 14

    work page 2002

  65. [65]

    Faessler, Prog

    A. Faessler, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 11, 171-197 (1984)

    work page 1984

  66. [66]

    Faessler, Prog

    A. Faessler, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 13, 253-273 (1985)

    work page 1985

  67. [67]

    Faessler, Prog

    A. Faessler, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 20, 151-173 (1988)

    work page 1988

  68. [68]

    Oka, and K

    M. Oka, and K. Yazaki, ”Quarks and Nuclei” (Weise, W., ed .), p. 489. Singapore: World-Scientific 1984

    work page 1984

  69. [69]

    Shimizu, Rept

    K. Shimizu, Rept. Prog. Phys. 52, 1 (1989)

    work page 1989

  70. [70]

    Yamauchi, K

    Y. Yamauchi, K. Tsushima and A. Faessler, Few Body Syst. 12, 69 (1992)

    work page 1992

  71. [71]

    S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. Lett . 113, no. 11, 112001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    S. J. Brodsky and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    R. F. Lebed, Few Body Syst. 59, no. 5, 106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Brambilla et al

    N. Brambilla et al. , Eur. Phys. J. C 74, no. 10, 2981 (2014)

    work page 2014

  75. [75]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa and V. Riquer, Phys . Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005)

    work page 2005

  76. [76]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa and V. Riquer, Phys . Rev. D 89, 114010 (2014)

    work page 2014

  77. [77]

    Karliner and H

    M. Karliner and H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B 638, 221 (2006)

    work page 2006

  78. [78]

    A. M. Kusainov, V. G. Neudatchin, and I. T. Obukhovsky, P hys. Rev. C 44, 2343 (1991)

    work page 1991

  79. [79]

    L. Ya. Glozman, V. G. Neudatchin, and I. T. Obukhovsky, P hys. Rev. C 48, 389 (1993)

    work page 1993

  80. [80]

    Stancu, S

    Fl. Stancu, S. Pepin, and L. Ya. Glozman, Phys. Rev. C 56, 2779 (1997)

    work page 1997

Showing first 80 references.