pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07991 · v1 · pith:6JC7SJCDnew · submitted 2019-07-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Photon phase shift at the few-photon level and optical switching by a quantum dot in a microcavity

L. M. Wells , S. Kalliakos , B. Villa , D. J. P. Ellis , R. M. Stevenson , A. J. Bennett , I. Farrer , D. A. Ritchie
show 1 more author
A. J. Shields
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 19:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum dotmicropillar cavityphoton phase shiftspin-photon interactionoptical switchingsingle-photon nonlinearityRaman transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A charged quantum dot in a micropillar cavity produces phase shifts of nearly 90 degrees on single-photon pulses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the spin-photon interaction in a charged InAs quantum dot inside a micropillar cavity shifts the phase of scattered light pulses containing only a few photons by up to 90 degrees. It further demonstrates an optical phase switch controlled by pumping the dot's spin through Raman transitions in an applied magnetic field. Experiments are compared to a theoretical model of the system dynamics. A reader would care because this creates a strong optical nonlinearity at very low light levels, which is a basic requirement for building photon-based quantum logic elements.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that a charged quantum dot in a micropillar cavity induces phase shifts of close to 90 degrees on scattered light pulses at the single-photon level through the nonlinearity from the spin-photon interaction. They additionally demonstrate a photon phase switch by employing a spin-pumping mechanism via Raman transitions in an in-plane magnetic field. These findings are supported by a theoretical model of the system dynamics.

What carries the argument

The spin-photon nonlinearity in the charged InAs quantum dot within the micropillar cavity, which imprints a phase on few-photon pulses through the dot's spin-dependent response.

If this is right

  • The system functions as a controllable phase switch at the single-photon level via spin pumping.
  • Strong few-photon nonlinearities become available for quantum information processing tasks.
  • Magnetic-field tuning of Raman transitions provides external control over the phase response.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining this cavity-enhanced dot with other emitter types could test whether similar phase shifts appear in different material systems.
  • The demonstrated switching might extend to multi-photon interference experiments if spin coherence times allow.
  • Integration into waveguide networks could allow the phase shift to act on propagating photons rather than scattered ones.

Load-bearing premise

The measured phase shift arises dominantly from the spin-photon nonlinearity in the quantum dot rather than from cavity filtering, material dispersion, or classical nonlinearities.

What would settle it

If the phase shift remains unchanged when the laser is detuned from the quantum dot resonance or when the dot charge state is altered to remove the spin degree of freedom, while vanishing only under conditions unrelated to the dot, the claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07991 by A. J. Bennett, A. J. Shields, B. Villa, D. A. Ritchie, D. J. P. Ellis, I. Farrer, L. M. Wells, R. M. Stevenson, S. Kalliakos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Band gap diagram showing electron (left) and hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A schematic of the pulse sequence used to control the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We exploit the nonlinearity arising from the spin-photon interaction in an InAs quantum dot to demonstrate phase shifts of scattered light pulses at the single-photon level. Photon phase shifts of close to 90 degrees are achieved using a charged quantum dot in a micropillar cavity. We also demonstrate a photon phase switch by using a spin-pumping mechanism through Raman transitions in an in-plane magnetic field. The experimental findings are supported by a theoretical model which explores the dynamics of the system. Our results demonstrate the potential of quantum dot-induced nonlinearities for quantum information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental demonstration of photon phase shifts approaching 90 degrees at the single-photon level, achieved via the spin-photon nonlinearity of a charged InAs quantum dot in a micropillar cavity. It further demonstrates a photon phase switch enabled by spin-pumping through Raman transitions in an in-plane magnetic field. The findings are supported by a theoretical model exploring the system dynamics, with the overall results positioned as evidence for the utility of quantum-dot nonlinearities in quantum information processing.

Significance. If the central claims hold after verification of the supporting data and controls, this constitutes a meaningful advance in solid-state quantum optics. Achieving near-90° phase shifts at the few-photon level in a scalable platform is a notable technical milestone with direct relevance to photonic quantum gates and switches. The explicit pairing of experiment with a dynamical model is a strength that helps anchor the interpretation.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the experimental findings are supported by a theoretical model, but the main text should include a dedicated section or subsection that quantitatively compares the model predictions (e.g., phase-shift magnitude versus photon number or detuning) to the measured data, including any fitting parameters and residuals.
  2. Clarify the precise definition of 'few-photon level' (average photon number per pulse or peak intensity) and provide the corresponding power-dependent data or scaling plots to allow readers to assess the regime of operation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work and for recommending minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report, so there are no specific points requiring point-by-point rebuttal. We will address any minor issues during preparation of the revised manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The abstract and supplied context contain no equations, fitted parameters, derivation steps, or self-citations that could reduce any claimed result to its inputs by construction. The central claims rest on experimental phase-shift measurements and an external theoretical model whose details are not shown; no self-definitional, fitted-input, or uniqueness-imported patterns are detectable. This is the normal finding for an experimental report whose load-bearing content is observational rather than internally derived.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no equations, parameters, or postulates; ledger is therefore empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5661 in / 963 out tokens · 19044 ms · 2026-05-24T19:54:42.607275+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Bright single photon source based on self-aligned quantum dot–cavity systems,

    Sebastian Maier, Peter Gold, Alfred Forchel, Niels Gregersen, Jesper Mørk, Sven H¨ ofling, Christian Schnei- der, and Martin Kamp, “Bright single photon source based on self-aligned quantum dot–cavity systems,” Opt. Express 22, 8136–8142 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Near-optimal single- photon sources in the solid state,

    N. Somaschi, V. Giesz, L. de Santis, J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, G. Hornecker, S. L. Portalupi, T. Grange, C. Ant´ on, J. Demory, C. G´ omez, I. Sagnes, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Lema´ ıtre, A. Auffeves, A. G. White, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, “Near-optimal single- photon sources in the solid state,” Nature Photonics 10, 340 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a res- onantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar,

    Xing Ding, Yu He, Z.-C. Duan, Niels Gregersen, M.-C. Chen, S. Unsleber, S. Maier, Christian Schneider, Mar- tin Kamp, Sven H¨ ofling, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan, “On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a res- onantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 020401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire,

    Julien Claudon, Jo¨ el Bleuse, Nitin Singh Malik, Maela Bazin, P´ erine Jaffrennou, Niels Gregersen, Christophe Sauvan, Philippe Lalanne, and Jean-Michel G´ erard, “A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire,” Nature Photonics 4, 174 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Quantum boxes as active probes for photonic mi- crostructures: The pillar microcavity case,

    J. M. G´ erard, D. Barrier, J. Y. Marzin, R. Kuszelewicz, L. Manin, E. Costard, V. Thierry-Mieg, and T. Rivera, “Quantum boxes as active probes for photonic mi- crostructures: The pillar microcavity case,” Applied Physics Letters 69, 449–451 (1996)

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Cavity-quantum electrodynamics using a sin- gle inas quantum dot in a microdisk structure,

    A. Kiraz, P. Michler, C. Becher, B. Gayral, A. Imamo˘ glu, Lidong Zhang, E. Hu, W. V. Schoenfeld, and P. M. Petroff, “Cavity-quantum electrodynamics using a sin- gle inas quantum dot in a microdisk structure,” Applied Physics Letters 78, 3932–3934 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Photonic crystal microcavities for cavity quantum electrodynamics with a single quantum dot,

    Jelena Vuˇ ckovi´ c and Yoshihisa Yamamoto, “Photonic crystal microcavities for cavity quantum electrodynamics with a single quantum dot,” Applied Physics Letters 82, 2374–2376 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Quantum entan- glement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit,

    E. Togan, Y. Chu, A. S. Trifonov, L. Jiang, J. Maze, L. Childress, M. V. G. Dutt, A. S. Sørensen, P. R. Hem- mer, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, “Quantum entan- glement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit,” Nature 466, 730 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Cnot and bell-state analysis in the weak-coupling cavity qed regime,

    Cristian Bonato, Florian Haupt, Sumant S. R. Oem- rawsingh, Jan Gudat, Dapeng Ding, Martin P. van Exter, and Dirk Bouwmeester, “Cnot and bell-state analysis in the weak-coupling cavity qed regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 160503 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Photon sorting, efficient bell measure- ments, and a deterministic controlled-z gate using a pas- sive two-level nonlinearity,

    T. C. Ralph, I. S¨ ollner, S. Mahmoodian, A. G. White, and P. Lodahl, “Photon sorting, efficient bell measure- ments, and a deterministic controlled-z gate using a pas- sive two-level nonlinearity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 173603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    A semiconductor photon- sorter,

    A. J. Bennett, J. P. Lee, D. J. P. Ellis, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, “A semiconductor photon- sorter,” Nature Nanotechnology 11, 857 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Photonic transistor and router using a sin- gle quantum-dot-confined spin in a single-sided optical microcavity,

    C. Y. Hu, “Photonic transistor and router using a sin- gle quantum-dot-confined spin in a single-sided optical microcavity,” Scientific Reports 7, 45582 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Scalable photonic quan- tum computation through cavity-assisted interactions,

    L.-M. Duan and H. J. Kimble, “Scalable photonic quan- tum computation through cavity-assisted interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127902 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Nearly deterministic linear optical controlled-not gate,

    Kae Nemoto and W. J. Munro, “Nearly deterministic linear optical controlled-not gate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 250502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Quantum cor- relations and non-demolition measurements using two- photon non-linearities in optical cavities,

    P. Grangier, J. F. Roch, and S. Reynaud, “Quantum cor- relations and non-demolition measurements using two- photon non-linearities in optical cavities,” Optics Com- munications 72, 387–392 (1989)

    work page 1989

  16. [16]

    Quantum non-demolition measure- ments in optics,

    Philippe Grangier, Juan Ariel Levenson, and Jean- Philippe Poizat, “Quantum non-demolition measure- ments in optics,” Nature 396, 537 (1998)

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    Quantum nondemoli- tion measurement of spin via the paramagnetic faraday rotation,

    Y. Takahashi, K. Honda, N. Tanaka, K. Toyoda, K. Ishikawa, and T. Yabuzaki, “Quantum nondemoli- tion measurement of spin via the paramagnetic faraday rotation,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 4974–4979 (1999)

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Nondestructive optical measurements of a single electron spin in a quan- tum dot,

    J. Berezovsky, M. H. Mikkelsen, O. Gywat, N. G. Stoltz, L. A. Coldren, and D. D. Awschalom, “Nondestructive optical measurements of a single electron spin in a quan- tum dot,” Science 314, 1916–1920 (2006)

    work page 1916

  19. [19]

    Observation of faraday rotation from a single confined spin,

    Mete Atat¨ ure, Jan Dreiser, Antonio Badolato, and Atac Imamoglu, “Observation of faraday rotation from a single confined spin,” Nature Physics 3, 101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Optically detected coher- ent spin dynamics of a single electron in a quantum dot,

    M. H. Mikkelsen, J. Berezovsky, N. G. Stoltz, L. A. Col- dren, and D. D. Awschalom, “Optically detected coher- ent spin dynamics of a single electron in a quantum dot,” Nature Physics 3, 770 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Macro- scopic rotation of photon polarization induced by a single spin,

    Christophe Arnold, Justin Demory, Vivien Loo, Aristide Lemaˆ ıtre, Isabelle Sagnes, Mikha¨ ıl Glazov, Olivier Krebs, Paul Voisin, Pascale Senellart, and Lo¨ ıc Lanco, “Macro- scopic rotation of photon polarization induced by a single spin,” Nature Communications 6, 6236 (2015). 6

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Macroscopic kerr rotation from a bright negatively charged quantum dot in a low-q micropillar cavity,

    P. Androvitsaneas, A.B. Young, C. Schneider, S. H ¨ o fling, M. Kamp, E. Harbord, J. G. Rarity, and R. Oul- ton, “Macroscopic kerr rotation from a bright negatively charged quantum dot in a low-q micropillar cavity,” in 2015 European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics - European Quantum Electronics Conference (Optical So- ciety of America, 2015) p. EA84

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    A quantum phase switch between a single solid- state spin and a photon,

    Shuo Sun, Hyochul Kim, Glenn S. Solomon, and Edo Waks, “A quantum phase switch between a single solid- state spin and a photon,” Nature Nanotechnology 11, 539 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    A determin- istic quantum dot micropillar single photon source with >65% extraction efficiency based on fluorescence imaging method,

    Shunfa Liu, Yuming Wei, Rongling Su, Rongbin Su, Ben Ma, Zesheng Chen, Haiqiao Ni, Zhichuan Niu, Ying Yu, Yujia Wei, Xuehua Wang, and Siyuan Yu, “A determin- istic quantum dot micropillar single photon source with >65% extraction efficiency based on fluorescence imaging method,” Scientific Reports 7, 13986 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Quantum- dot spin-state preparation with near-unity fidelity,

    Mete Atat¨ ure, Jan Dreiser, Antonio Badolato, Alexander H¨ ogele, Khaled Karrai, and Atac Imamoglu, “Quantum- dot spin-state preparation with near-unity fidelity,” Sci- ence 312, 551–553 (2006)

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Controllable photonic time- bin qubits from a quantum dot,

    J. P. Lee, L. M. Wells, B. Villa, S. Kalliakos, R. M. Stevenson, D. J. P. Ellis, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, A. J. Bennett, and A. J. Shields, “Controllable photonic time- bin qubits from a quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 021078 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Controlled-not gate operating with single photons,

    M. A. Pooley, D. J. P. Ellis, R. B. Patel, A. J. Ben- nett, K. H. A. Chan, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, “Controlled-not gate operating with single photons,” Applied Physics Letters 100, 211103 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4719077

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4719077 2012

  28. [28]

    A solid-state single-photon filter,

    Lorenzo de Santis, Carlos Ant´ on, Bogdan Reznychenko, Niccolo Somaschi, Guillaume Coppola, Jean Senellart, Carmen G´ omez, Aristide Lemaˆ ıtre, Isabelle Sagnes, An- drew G. White, Lo¨ ıc Lanco, Alexia Auff` eves, and Pas- cale Senellart, “A solid-state single-photon filter,” Nature Nanotechnology 12, 663 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Rodney Loudon, The quantum theory of light (OUP Ox- ford, 2000)

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    237 (Springer, 2017)

    Peter Michler, Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Technologies, Vol. 237 (Springer, 2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details on equations, parameters and meth- ods used in the theoretical model, including references [37-41]

    work page

  32. [32]

    Voltage tunability of single-spin states in a quantum dot,

    Anthony J. Bennett, Matthew A. Pooley, Yameng Cao, Niklas Sk¨ old, Ian Farrer, David A. Ritchie, and An- drew J. Shields, “Voltage tunability of single-spin states in a quantum dot,” Nature Communications 4, 1522 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Fast initialization of the spin state of an electron in a quantum dot in the voigt configuration,

    C. Emary, Xiaodong Xu, D. G. Steel, S. Saikin, and L. J. Sham, “Fast initialization of the spin state of an electron in a quantum dot in the voigt configuration,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 047401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Anisotropy of electron and hole g tensors of quantum dots: An intuitive picture based on spin-correlated orbital currents,

    J. van Bree, A. Yu. Silov, M. L. van Maasakkers, C. E. Pryor, M. E. Flatt´ e, and P. M. Koenraad, “Anisotropy of electron and hole g tensors of quantum dots: An intuitive picture based on spin-correlated orbital currents,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 035311 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Coherent optical control of a quantum-dot spin-qubit in a waveguide-based spin-photon interface

    Dapeng Ding, Martin Hayhurst Appel, Alisa Javadi, Xi- aoyan Zhou, Matthias Christian L¨ obl, Immo S¨ ollner, R¨ udiger Schott, Camille Papon, Tommaso Pregno- lato, Leonardo Midolo, et al. , “Coherent optical con- trol of a quantum-dot spin-qubit in a waveguide-based spin-photon interface,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06103 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Cavity-enhanced coherent light scat- tering from a quantum dot,

    Anthony J. Bennett, James P. Lee, David J. P. El- lis, Thomas Meany, Eoin Murray, Frederik F. Floether, Jonathan P. Griffths, Ian Farrer, David A. Ritchie, and Andrew J. Shields, “Cavity-enhanced coherent light scat- tering from a quantum dot,” Science Advances 2 (2016), 10.1126/sciadv.1501256

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501256 2016

  37. [37]

    Efficient deterministic giant photon phase shift from a single charged quantum dot,

    Petros Androvitsaneas, Andrew Young, Joseph Lennon, Christian Schneider, Sebastian Maier, Janna Hinchliff, George Atkinson, Edmund Harbord, Martin Kamp, Sven Hoefling, et al. , “Efficient deterministic giant photon phase shift from a single charged quantum dot,” in CLEO: QELS Fundamental Science (Optical Society of America, 2017) pp. FTu4E–4

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Tomography of the optical polarization rotation induced by a single quantum dot in a cavity,

    Carlos Ant´ on, Paul Hilaire, Christian A. Kessler, Justin Demory, Carmen G´ omez, Aristide Lemaˆ ıtre, Isabelle Sagnes, Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura, Olivier Krebs, Niccolo Somaschi, Pascale Senellart, and Lo¨ ıc Lanco, “Tomography of the optical polarization rotation induced by a single quantum dot in a cavity,” Optica 4, 1326–1332 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Phonon-assisted transitions from quantum dot excitons to cavity photons,

    Ulrich Hohenester, Arne Laucht, Michael Kaniber, Nor- man Hauke, Andre Neumann, Abbas Mohtashami, Marek Seliger, Max Bichler, and Jonathan J. Finley, “Phonon-assisted transitions from quantum dot excitons to cavity photons,” Phys. Rev. B 80, 201311(R) (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Optical pumping of a single hole spin in a quantum dot,

    Brian D. Gerardot, Daniel Brunner, Paul A. Dalgarno, Patrik ¨Ohberg, Stefan Seidl, Martin Kroner, Khaled Kar- rai, Nick G. Stoltz, Pierre M. Petroff, and Richard J. Warburton, “Optical pumping of a single hole spin in a quantum dot,” Nature 451, 441 (2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Spin–orbit- induced hole spin relaxation in inas and gaas quantum dots,

    J. I. Climente, C. Segarra, and J. Planelles, “Spin–orbit- induced hole spin relaxation in inas and gaas quantum dots,” New Journal of Physics 15, 093009 (2013). VI. Supplementary Information A. Quantum dot band gap diagram and charge capture FIG. 4. Band gap diagram showing electron (left) and hole (right) capture in a QD system. 7 Band gap diagrams illu...

    work page 2013