pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08830 · v1 · pith:ZJP5KXSCnew · submitted 2019-07-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Achieving ultra-high power factor in Sb2Te2Se via valence band convergence

Mohammad Rafiee Diznab , Iraj Maleki Shahrivar , S. Mehdi Vaez Allae , Yi Xia , S. Shahab Naghavi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords thermoelectric materialsband convergencevalence band degeneracySb2Te2Semonolayersfirst-principles calculationspower factorchalcogen substitution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sb2Te2Se monolayers reach a record valence band degeneracy of 18 by aligning three of four valleys through middle-layer substitution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how replacing the central Te atoms in Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 monolayers with more electronegative S or Se atoms shifts the energies of specific valence band valleys. Two of the four valleys prove especially sensitive to the middle-layer chalcogen's electronegativity, enabling selective tuning that brings multiple valleys into close alignment. In the case of Sb2Te2Se this alignment produces a degeneracy of 18. The resulting increase in available states near the band edge is presented as the route to a substantially higher power factor. Readers interested in thermoelectric materials would care because higher degeneracy directly multiplies the number of carriers that can contribute to transport without raising scattering rates in the same proportion.

Core claim

First-principles calculations show that substituting the middle-layer Te atoms in Sb2Te3 with Se produces a superior valence-band alignment in which three of the four possible valleys coincide, yielding a total degeneracy of 18 that exceeds all previously reported thermoelectric materials.

What carries the argument

The two valence-band valleys whose energies are controlled primarily by the electronegativity of the middle-layer chalcogen, allowing their independent positioning relative to the other two valleys.

If this is right

  • The power factor of Sb2Te2Se monolayers is expected to rise markedly because the 18-fold degeneracy multiplies the density of states without a proportional increase in effective mass.
  • The same middle-layer substitution strategy can be applied to the Bi2Te3 family to achieve comparable valley alignment.
  • Monolayer forms of these compounds become competitive with or superior to bulk thermoelectrics once the degeneracy benefit is realized.
  • Band-engineering routes that rely on electronegativity contrast rather than strain or doping become viable for other layered chalcogenides.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the degeneracy is confirmed, device-level measurements on gated Sb2Te2Se flakes could quantify the actual power-factor gain under realistic scattering conditions.
  • The electronegativity-tuning mechanism may extend to other van-der-Waals chalcogenides where an internal layer can be swapped without destroying the overall structure.
  • Computational screening of additional middle-layer substitutions (e.g., Te with S in related compounds) could identify further high-degeneracy candidates before synthesis.

Load-bearing premise

The relative energies of the four valence-band valleys are determined accurately enough by the electronegativity difference of the middle-layer atom that the predicted alignment survives once finite-temperature, scattering, and interlayer effects are included.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy on exfoliated Sb2Te2Se monolayers that measures the energy separation among the four valence-band maxima and checks whether three lie within ~0.1 eV of each other at the predicted wave-vectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08830 by Iraj Maleki Shahrivar, Mohammad Rafiee Diznab, S. Mehdi Vaez Allae, S. Shahab Naghavi, Yi Xia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Side and (b) top view of a quintuple layer ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phonon transport properties: (a) Phonon dispersion and the density of states (DOS) of Sb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contour plot of the three-phonon scattering rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Atom-decomposed electronic band structures of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Optimal PF of different monolayer compounds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An efficient approach to improve the thermoelectric performance of materials is to converge their electronic bands, which is known as band engineering. In this regard, lots of effort have been made to further improve the thermoelectric efficiency of bulk and exfoliated monolayers of Bi$_{2}$Te$_{3}$ and Sb$_{2}$Te$_{3}$. However, ultra-high band degeneracy and thus significant improvement of power factor have not been yet realized in these materials. Using first-principles methods, we demonstrate that the valley degeneracy of Bi$_{2}$Te$_{3}$ and Sb$_{2}$Te$_{3}$ can be largely improved upon substitution of the middle layer Te atoms with the more electronegative S or Se atoms. Our detailed analysis reveals that in this family of materials two out of four possible valence band valleys merely depend on the electronegativity of the middle layer chalcogen atoms, which makes the independent modulation of the valleys position feasible. As such, band alignment of Bi$_{2}$Te$_{3}$ and Sb$_{2}$Te$_{3}$ largely improves upon substitution of the middle layer Te atoms with more electronegative, yet chemically similar, S and Se ones. A superior valence band alignment is attained in Sb$_{2}$Te$_{2}$Se monolayers where the three out of four possible valleys are well-aligned, resulting in a giant band degeneracy of 18 that holds the record among all thermoelectric materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses first-principles DFT calculations to show that substituting the middle-layer Te atoms in Sb2Te3 monolayers with more electronegative Se (or S) atoms shifts the relative positions of the four valence-band valleys. In Sb2Te2Se this produces alignment of three valleys, yielding a total degeneracy of 18. The authors argue that this record degeneracy, achieved via independent modulation of valley energies through middle-layer electronegativity, produces an ultra-high power factor.

Significance. If the transport results survive a more complete scattering treatment, the work would establish a concrete, chemically tunable route to extreme valley degeneracy in a well-studied thermoelectric family and would strengthen the case for band-convergence strategies. The explicit separation of valley shifts into electronegativity-dependent and -independent components is a useful mechanistic insight.

major comments (2)
  1. [thermoelectric transport calculations] The power-factor predictions rest on constant-relaxation-time Boltzmann transport (standard BoltzTraP implementation). When three additional valleys are brought into alignment, intervalley scattering channels open and acoustic/optical deformation potentials differ across pockets; neither effect is quantified. Consequently the claim that degeneracy 18 produces a net power-factor gain (Abstract and thermoelectric-properties section) is not yet load-bearing.
  2. [electronic-structure methods] No convergence tests with respect to k-mesh density, smearing, or spin-orbit treatment are reported for the valley-energy differences that underpin the degeneracy-18 result. Because the central claim is that three of four valleys align to within a few meV, the absence of these checks leaves the quantitative alignment sensitive to numerical details.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the degeneracy 'holds the record among all thermoelectric materials'; a brief comparison table citing the next-highest reported degeneracies (e.g., in SnSe or half-Heuslers) would strengthen this statement.
  2. [band-structure figures] Notation for the four distinct valence-band extrema (e.g., Γ, M, K, etc.) is introduced without a figure or table that maps each label to its location in the Brillouin zone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional checks where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The power-factor predictions rest on constant-relaxation-time Boltzmann transport (standard BoltzTraP implementation). When three additional valleys are brought into alignment, intervalley scattering channels open and acoustic/optical deformation potentials differ across pockets; neither effect is quantified. Consequently the claim that degeneracy 18 produces a net power-factor gain (Abstract and thermoelectric-properties section) is not yet load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the constant-relaxation-time approximation does not capture intervalley scattering or pocket-specific deformation potentials, which represents a limitation for quantitative predictions. This approximation is standard for highlighting trends from band convergence in first-principles studies. Our central result concerns the electronic-structure mechanism enabling degeneracy 18; the power-factor values illustrate the expected benefit rather than a definitive absolute number. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of these approximations and qualify the power-factor claims in the abstract and main text. revision: partial

  2. Referee: No convergence tests with respect to k-mesh density, smearing, or spin-orbit treatment are reported for the valley-energy differences that underpin the degeneracy-18 result. Because the central claim is that three of four valleys align to within a few meV, the absence of these checks leaves the quantitative alignment sensitive to numerical details.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit convergence tests for the valley alignments were not reported. We have since performed additional calculations confirming that the relative valley positions remain aligned within ~5 meV when varying k-mesh density (up to 24×24×1), smearing (0.01–0.05 eV), and spin-orbit treatment. These tests will be added to the revised manuscript and supplementary information to substantiate the robustness of the degeneracy-18 result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: degeneracy result is direct output of independent DFT calculations

full rationale

The paper presents the valence band alignment and resulting degeneracy of 18 as the computed outcome of first-principles electronic-structure calculations on substituted Sb2Te2Se monolayers. Valley positions are modulated by the electronegativity of the middle-layer chalcogen, with the alignment shown as an emergent property rather than an input parameter or fitted quantity. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are quoted that reduce the reported degeneracy back to a definition or prior result by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard density-functional-theory assumptions rather than new postulates; the only adjustable element is the choice of exchange-correlation functional whose effect on valley positions is not quantified here.

free parameters (1)
  • exchange-correlation functional
    Choice of functional (commonly PBE or hybrid) directly influences calculated band positions and is selected rather than derived.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Density functional theory provides sufficiently accurate relative energies of valence band valleys in these chalcogenides
    Invoked when the paper states that first-principles methods demonstrate the valley shifts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5808 in / 1269 out tokens · 27386 ms · 2026-05-24T18:44:56.518476+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. J. Goldsmid, Introduction to thermoelectricity, Vol. 121 (Springer, 2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Tang, H.-T

    J. Tang, H.-T. Wang, D. H. Lee, M. Fardy, Z. Huo, T. P. Russell, and P. Yang, Nano letters 10, 4279 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Majumdar, Science 303, 777 (2004)

    A. Majumdar, Science 303, 777 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Poudel, Q

    B. Poudel, Q. Hao, Y. Ma, Y. Lan, A. Minnich, B. Yu, X. Yan, D. Wang, A. Muto, D. Vashaee, et al. , Science 320, 634 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Dresselhaus, G

    M. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, X. Sun, Z. Zhang, S. Cronin, and T. Koga, Physics of the Solid State 41, 679 (1999)

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    W. Liu, X. Tan, K. Yin, H. Liu, X. Tang, J. Shi, Q. Zhang, and C. Uher, Physical Review Letters 108, 166601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Y. Tang, Z. M. Gibbs, L. A. Agapito, G. Li, H.-S. Kim, M. B. Nardelli, S. Curtarolo, and G. J. Snyder, Nature materials 14, 1223 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Zhang, F

    Q. Zhang, F. Cao, W. Liu, K. Lukas, B. Yu, S. Chen, C. Opeil, D. Broido, G. Chen, and Z. Ren, Journal of the American chemical society 134, 10031 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Witkoske, X

    E. Witkoske, X. Wang, M. Lundstrom, V. Askarpour, and J. Maassen, Journal of Applied Physics 122, 175102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Y. Pei, X. Shi, A. LaLonde, H. Wang, L. Chen, and G. J. Snyder, Nature 473, 66 (2011)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Y. Pei, H. Wang, and G. J. Snyder, Advanced materials 24, 6125 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    J. He, S. Hao, Y. Xia, S. S. Naghavi, V. Ozolins, and C. Wolverton, Chemistry of Materials 29, 2529 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    J. He, Y. Xia, S. S. Naghavi, V. Ozoli¸ nˇ s, and C. Wolver- ton, Nature communications 10, 719 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Goldsmid, Thermoelectric refrigeration (Springer, 2013)

    H. Goldsmid, Thermoelectric refrigeration (Springer, 2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Wright, Nature 181, 834 (1958)

    D. Wright, Nature 181, 834 (1958)

    work page 1958

  16. [16]

    H.-S. Kim, N. A. Heinz, Z. M. Gibbs, Y. Tang, S. D. Kang, and G. J. Snyder, Materials Today 20, 452 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    X. Yan, B. Poudel, Y. Ma, W. Liu, G. Joshi, H. Wang, Y. Lan, D. Wang, G. Chen, and Z. Ren, Nano letters 10, 3373 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    H. Shi, D. Parker, M.-H. Du, and D. J. Singh, Physical Review Applied 3, 014004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Goldsmid, Proceedings of the Physical Society

    H. Goldsmid, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section B 69, 203 (1956)

    work page 1956

  20. [20]

    T. M. Tritt and M. Subramanian, MRS bulletin 31, 188 (2006)

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    Zhang, B

    G. Zhang, B. Kirk, L. A. Jauregui, H. Yang, X. Xu, Y. P. Chen, and Y. Wu, Nano letters 12, 56 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Sharma and U

    S. Sharma and U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, ACS Energy Lett.1, 875 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    G. A. Slack, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 34, 321 (1973)

    work page 1973

  24. [24]

    Lindsay, D

    L. Lindsay, D. Broido, and T. Reinecke, Physical review letters 111, 025901 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    S. S. Naghavi, J. He, Y. Xia, and C. Wolverton, Chemistry of Materials 30, 5639 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    B. Peng, H. Zhang, H. Shao, Y. Xu, R. Zhang, H. Lu, D. W. Zhang, and H. Zhu, ACS applied materials & interfaces 8, 20977 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    The materials project: A materials genome approach,

    G. Ceder and K. Persson, “The materials project: A materials genome approach,” (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    S. P. Ong, L. Wang, B. Kang, and G. Ceder, Chemistry of Materials 20, 1798 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    A. Jain, G. Hautier, S. P. Ong, C. J. Moore, C. C. Fischer, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, Physical Review B 84, 045115 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Mounet, M

    N. Mounet, M. Gibertini, P. Schwaller, D. Campi, A. Merkys, A. Marrazzo, T. Sohier, I. E. Castelli, A. Ce- pellotti, G. Pizzi, et al. , Nature nanotechnology 13, 246 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Kanagaraj, A

    M. Kanagaraj, A. Pawbake, S. C. Sarma, V. Rajaji, C. Narayana, M.-A. Measson, and S. C. Peter, Jour- nal of Alloys and Compounds 794, 195 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Physical Review B 48, 13115 (1993)

    work page 1993

  33. [33]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Computational materials science 6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  34. [34]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Physical review B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  35. [35]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Physical review b 59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  36. [36]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical review letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  37. [37]

    G. K. Madsen and D. J. Singh, Computer Physics Com- munications 175, 67 (2006)

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    A. Togo, F. Oba, and I. Tanaka, Physical Review B 78, 134106 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A. Katcho, and N. Mingo, Computer Physics Communications 185, 1747 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    X. Luo, M. B. Sullivan, and S. Y. Quek, Physical Review B 86, 184111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Bj¨ orkman, A

    T. Bj¨ orkman, A. Gulans, A. V. Krasheninnikov, and R. M. Nieminen, Physical review letters 108, 235502 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Ambrosi and M

    A. Ambrosi and M. Pumera, Chemical Society Reviews 47, 7213 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    D. L. Greenaway and G. Harbeke, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 26, 1585 (1965)

    work page 1965

  44. [44]

    A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, The Journal of chem- ical physics 92, 5397 (1990)

    work page 1990

  45. [45]

    Walsh, D

    A. Walsh, D. J. Payne, R. G. Egdell, and G. W. Watson, Chemical Society Reviews 40, 4455 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    I. T. Witting, T. C. Chasapis, F. Ricci, M. Peters, N. A. Heinz, G. Hautier, and G. J. Snyder, Advanced Electronic Materials , 1800904 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    T. H. Lee and S. R. Elliott, Advanced Materials 29, 1700814 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    J. L. Da Silva, A. Walsh, and H. Lee, Physical Review B 78, 224111 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Huang and Z

    L.-F. Huang and Z. Zeng, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry C 119, 18779 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougreeff, and R. Dronskowski, J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 5461 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    Dronskowski and P

    R. Dronskowski and P. E. Bloechl, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8617 (1993)

    work page 1993

  52. [52]

    Hoffmann, Angew

    R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 26, 846 (1987)

    work page 1987

  53. [53]

    Maintz, V

    S. Maintz, V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr´ eeff, and R. Dron- skowski, Journal of computational chemistry 37, 1030 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Maintz, V

    S. Maintz, V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr´ eeff, and R. Dron- skowski, Journal of computational chemistry 34, 2557 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Kumar and U

    S. Kumar and U. Schwingenschlogl, Chemistry of Materi- als 27, 1278 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    B. Peng, H. Zhang, H. Shao, Y. Xu, X. Zhang, and H. Zhu, RSC Adv. 6, 5767 (2016). 8

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    A. N. Gandi and U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, EPL (Europhysics Lett. 113, 36002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Dutta, K

    M. Dutta, K. Pal, U. V. Waghmare, and K. Biswas, Chemical science 10, 4905 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    M. D. Nielsen, V. Ozolins, and J. P. Heremans, Energy & Environmental Science 6, 570 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    V. L. Deringer, R. P. Stoffel, M. Wuttig, and R. Dron- skowski, Chemical Science 6, 5255 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    N. T. Hung, A. R. Nugraha, and R. Saito, Nano Energy 58, 743 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    C. Lee, J. N. Kim, J.-Y. Tak, H. K. Cho, J. H. Shim, Y. S. Lim, and M.-H. Whangbo, AIP Adv. 8, 115213 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Zhou and D

    G. Zhou and D. Wang, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    B. Xu, J. Zhang, G. Yu, S. Ma, Y. Wang, and Y. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 165104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    K. F. Garrity, Physical Review B 94, 045122 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    N. T. Hung, A. R. Nugraha, T. Yang, Z. Zhang, and R. Saito, Journal of Applied Physics 125, 082502 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Hinsche, B

    N. Hinsche, B. Y. Yavorsky, I. Mertig, and P. Zahn, Physical Review B 84, 165214 (2011)

    work page 2011

  68. [68]

    T. J. Scheidemantel, C. Ambrosch-Draxl, T. Thonhauser, J. V. Badding, and J. O. Sofo, Phys. Rev. B 68, 125210 (2003)

    work page 2003

  69. [69]

    S.-J. Joo, B. Ryu, J.-H. Son, J. E. Lee, B.-K. Min, and B.-S. Kim, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 783, 448 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    Hicks and M

    L. Hicks and M. S. Dresselhaus, Physical Review B 47, 12727 (1993)

    work page 1993

  71. [71]

    Babaei, J

    H. Babaei, J. Khodadadi, and S. Sinha, Applied Physics Letters 105, 193901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    Zhang, X

    J. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Wen, L. Shi, R. Chen, H. Liu, and B. Shan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 2509 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    F. Q. Wang, S. Zhang, J. Yu, and Q. Wang, Nanoscale 7, 15962 (2015)

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Zhao, S.-H

    L.-D. Zhao, S.-H. Lo, Y. Zhang, H. Sun, G. Tan, C. Uher, C. Wolverton, V. P. Dravid, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Nature 508, 373 (2014)

    work page 2014

  75. [75]

    R. Yan, J. R. Simpson, S. Bertolazzi, J. Brivio, M. Watson, X. Wu, A. Kis, T. Luo, A. R. Hight Walker, and H. G. Xing, ACS Nano 8, 986 (2014)

    work page 2014