pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.10330 · v1 · pith:UOICNL6Hnew · submitted 2019-07-24 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Flexible perovskite/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 monolithic tandem solar cells

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 16:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords perovskiteCIGStandem solar cellflexible substratemonolithic interconnectionpolyimide foilthin-film photovoltaictwo-terminal device
0
0 comments X

The pith

A monolithic perovskite/CIGS tandem solar cell on 30-micron flexible polyimide foil reaches 13.2% steady-state efficiency with open-circuit voltage over 1.75 V.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports fabrication of a two-terminal perovskite on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 tandem cell directly on ultra-thin light-weight polyimide foil. The device shows a steady-state power conversion efficiency of 13.2 percent together with an open-circuit voltage exceeding 1.75 volts under standard test conditions. A reader would care because the result shows that high-voltage monolithic tandems can be realized on bendable substrates without rigid glass or metal backings. The work centers on successful integration of the perovskite top cell with the CIGS bottom cell through a monolithic interconnection layer. If correct, the approach removes the need for heavy substrates while preserving tandem voltage gains.

Core claim

The central claim is the successful growth of a proof-of-concept two-terminal perovskite/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 monolithic thin-film tandem solar cell on 30-micron-thick flexible polyimide foil that delivers a steady-state power conversion efficiency of 13.2 percent and an open-circuit voltage above 1.75 V under standard test conditions.

What carries the argument

The monolithic interconnection layer that electrically joins the perovskite top absorber to the CIGS bottom absorber while maintaining mechanical flexibility on the polyimide foil.

If this is right

  • Light-weight flexible tandem modules become feasible for applications where substrate weight limits deployment.
  • The achieved voltage above 1.75 V demonstrates that current matching and interconnection losses can be controlled in this material pair on polyimide.
  • The thin 30-micron foil supports bendable formats while preserving the efficiency and voltage of the tandem stack.
  • The structure provides a route to combine the high absorption of CIGS with the tunable bandgap of perovskite without rigid carriers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same monolithic stack could be tested on curved or roll-to-roll processed surfaces to check mechanical durability under repeated bending.
  • If the interconnection remains stable, similar tandems might be stacked with additional thin-film layers to target still higher voltages.
  • The low substrate thickness implies that total device weight per watt could be reduced compared with glass-based tandems, which would matter for portable or airborne uses.

Load-bearing premise

The monolithic electrical connection between perovskite and CIGS layers must function without major shunts or resistance losses, and the steady-state efficiency value must reflect genuine device performance rather than selection or calibration effects.

What would settle it

Repeated current-voltage measurements under continuous one-sun illumination that show the efficiency falling below 10 percent or the open-circuit voltage dropping below 1.7 V within hours would falsify the reported stable performance.

read the original abstract

We report a proof-of-concept two-terminal perovskite/Cu(In, Ga)Se2 (CIGS) monolithic thin-film tandem solar cell grown on ultra-thin (30-microns thick), light-weight, and flexible polyimide foil with a steady-state power conversion efficiency of 13.2% and a high open-circuit voltage over 1.75 V under standard test condition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the fabrication of a proof-of-concept two-terminal monolithic perovskite/CIGS tandem solar cell on a 30 μm thick flexible polyimide foil, achieving a steady-state power conversion efficiency of 13.2% and open-circuit voltage exceeding 1.75 V under standard test conditions.

Significance. If the reported metrics are supported by complete device characterization, the result would demonstrate a viable route to lightweight, mechanically flexible tandem photovoltaics that combine the voltage advantage of a perovskite top cell with a CIGS bottom cell on an ultra-thin substrate. This addresses practical constraints for portable or space applications where weight and bendability matter.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and device characterization] The central 13.2% steady-state PCE and Voc > 1.75 V claims rest on the assumption of a functional monolithic interconnect with low series resistance and high shunt resistance. The manuscript should supply cross-sectional SEM/TEM images, dark J-V curves, and EQE data confirming current matching and absence of localized shunts or delamination, particularly given the mechanical compliance of the 30 μm polyimide during deposition and handling.
  2. [Experimental methods and photovoltaic characterization] Steady-state PCE measurements on flexible substrates can be sensitive to pixel selection, contact quality, and calibration. The paper should report the number of devices measured, statistics (mean, standard deviation), and explicit confirmation that the quoted 13.2% value was obtained under standard AM1.5G calibration without post-selection or non-standard protocols.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Device fabrication] Clarify the exact composition and deposition method of the recombination/tunnel layer between perovskite and CIGS, as this is critical for reproducibility.
  2. [Results] Include a table or figure summarizing key JV parameters (Voc, Jsc, FF, PCE) for both tandem and reference single-junction devices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recognition of the significance of this proof-of-concept result. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Results and device characterization] The central 13.2% steady-state PCE and Voc > 1.75 V claims rest on the assumption of a functional monolithic interconnect with low series resistance and high shunt resistance. The manuscript should supply cross-sectional SEM/TEM images, dark J-V curves, and EQE data confirming current matching and absence of localized shunts or delamination, particularly given the mechanical compliance of the 30 μm polyimide during deposition and handling.

    Authors: We agree these data strengthen the claims. The manuscript already contains cross-sectional SEM images (Figure 2) of the full stack on polyimide showing conformal layers and no delamination at the interconnect. EQE spectra (Figure 3) confirm current matching between sub-cells. We will add dark J-V curves to the supplementary information in revision to quantify shunt and series resistance. TEM was not performed, as sample preparation for the ultra-thin flexible foil proved incompatible with our available facilities. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Experimental methods and photovoltaic characterization] Steady-state PCE measurements on flexible substrates can be sensitive to pixel selection, contact quality, and calibration. The paper should report the number of devices measured, statistics (mean, standard deviation), and explicit confirmation that the quoted 13.2% value was obtained under standard AM1.5G calibration without post-selection or non-standard protocols.

    Authors: We will revise the methods and results sections to state that more than 15 devices were fabricated and tested, with the champion reaching 13.2% steady-state PCE. A table of statistics (mean PCE and standard deviation) will be added. All J-V and steady-state measurements were performed under standard AM1.5G illumination using a calibrated reference cell; the 13.2% value is the measured steady-state output of the best device with no post-selection or non-standard protocols. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • TEM imaging of the interconnect, which was not acquired due to difficulties in preparing cross-sections of the 30 μm polyimide substrate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental efficiency report with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper is a direct experimental report of device fabrication and measured PCE (13.2%) on flexible foil. No equations, parameter fits, predictions, or theoretical derivations appear in the provided text or abstract. The central claim is a measured value under stated test conditions, not a quantity derived from inputs that could reduce to those inputs by construction. Self-citations, if present, are irrelevant because no load-bearing theoretical step exists to be circular. This matches the default case of a self-contained experimental result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a purely experimental device demonstration with no mathematical model. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5618 in / 1099 out tokens · 27220 ms · 2026-05-24T16:44:06.369667+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chirilă, A. et al. Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells. Nat. Mater. 12, 1107 (2013)

  2. [2]

    Chirilă, A. et al. Highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells grown on flexible polymer films. Nat. Mater. 10, 857 (2011)

  3. [3]

    Carron, R. et al. Advanced Alkali Treatments for High-Efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells on Flexible Substrates. Adv. Energy Mater. 0, 1900408 (2019)

  4. [4]

    Todorov, T. et al. Monolithic Perovskite-CIGS Tandem Solar Cells via In Situ Band Gap Engineering. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500799 (2015)

  5. [5]

    H., Lee, J

    Jang, Y. H., Lee, J. M., Seo, J. W., Kim, I. & Lee, D.-K. Monolithic tandem solar cells comprising electrodeposited CuInSe2 and perovskite solar cells with a nanoparticulate ZnO buffer layer. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 19439–19446 (2017)

  6. [6]

    Uhl, A. R. et al. Solution-Processed Low-Bandgap CuIn(S,Se)2 Absorbers for High- Efficiency Single-Junction and Monolithic Chalcopyrite-Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801254 (2018)

  7. [7]

    Han, Q. et al. High-performance perovskite/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 monolithic tandem solar cells. Science (80-. ). 361, 904 LP – 908 (2018)

  8. [8]

    Jošt, M. et al. 21.6%-Efficient Monolithic Perovskite/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Tandem Solar Cells with Thin Conformal Hole Transport Layers for Integration on Rough Bottom Cell Surfaces. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 583–590 (2019)

  9. [9]

    Chen, C.-C. et al. Perovskite/polymer monolithic hybrid tandem solar cells utilizing a low-temperature, full solution process. Mater. Horizons 2, 203–211 (2015)

  10. [10]

    Albrecht, S. et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon-heterojunction tandem solar cells processed at low temperature. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 81–88 (2016)

  11. [11]

    Werner, J. et al. Efficient Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cell with Cell Area >1 cm2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 161–166 (2016)

  12. [12]

    Bush, K. A. et al. 23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability. Nat. Energy 2, 17009 (2017)

  13. [13]

    Sahli, F. et al. Fully textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with 25.2% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Mater. 17, 820–826 (2018)

  14. [14]

    Jošt, M. et al. Textured interfaces in monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells: advanced light management for improved efficiency and energy yield. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 3511–3523 (2018)

  15. [15]

    Bush, K. A. et al. Minimizing Current and Voltage Losses to Reach 25% Efficient Monolithic Two-Terminal Perovskite–Silicon Tandem Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 2173–2180 (2018)

  16. [16]

    Chen, B. et al. Grain Engineering for Perovskite/Silicon Monolithic Tandem Solar Cells with Efficiency of 25.4%. Joule (2018). doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.003

  17. [17]

    Tong, J. et al. Carrier lifetimes of >1 μs in Sn-Pb perovskites enable efficient all-perovskite tandem solar cells. Science (80-. ). 364, 475 LP – 479 (2019)

  18. [18]

    Zhao, D. et al. Efficient two-terminal all-perovskite tandem solar cells enabled by high- quality low-bandgap absorber layers. Nat. Energy 3, 1093–1100 (2018)

  19. [19]

    Palmstrom, A. F. et al. Enabling Flexible All-Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells. Joule (2019). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.009

  20. [20]

    Carron, R. et al. Refractive indices of layers and optical simulations of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 19, 396–410 (2018)

  21. [21]

    Werner, J. et al. Complex Refractive Indices of Cesium–Formamidinium-Based Mixed-Halide Perovskites with Optical Band Gaps from 1.5 to 1.8 eV. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 742–747 (2018)