pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11292 · v1 · pith:ZEQC2FB3new · submitted 2019-07-24 · 📡 eess.IV · cs.CV

Recurrent Aggregation Learning for Multi-View Echocardiographic Sequences Segmentation

Ming Li , Weiwei Zhang , Guang Yang , Chengjia Wang , Heye Zhang , Huafeng Liu , Wei Zheng , Shuo Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.IV cs.CV
keywords multi-view echocardiographic segmentationrecurrent aggregationConvLSTMdouble-branch mechanismtemporal stabilitysequence segmentationmedical image analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

A double-branch recurrent aggregation network segments multi-view echocardiographic sequences with improved accuracy and temporal stability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a recurrent aggregation learning approach to segment sequences of heart ultrasound images taken from multiple angles. It extracts features at different scales using pyramid blocks and fuses spatial-temporal information with hierarchical recurrent units. A key innovation is the double-branch setup where a segmentation task and a classification task share and refine features through deep aggregation, allowing each to improve the other. This addresses challenges like limited labels, noise, and inconsistencies between views. Experiments on two datasets demonstrate gains in both accuracy and consistency over time.

Core claim

The authors establish that recurrent aggregation of multi-level and multi-scale features via pyramid ConvBlocks and hierarchical ConvLSTMs, combined with a double-branch mechanism for segmentation and classification, enables effective handling of multi-view echocardiographic sequences by providing mutual promotion that refines segmentations and reduces view gaps, resulting in superior performance and temporal stability.

What carries the argument

The double-branch aggregation mechanism in which the segmentation branch guides classification while the classification branch affords multi-view regularization to refine segmentations.

Load-bearing premise

The double-branch aggregation mechanism provides effective mutual promotion where the classification branch supplies multi-view regularization that refines segmentations and lessens gaps across views.

What would settle it

An ablation experiment removing the classification branch on the multi-view dataset and observing whether segmentation accuracy and temporal stability decrease would falsify the mutual promotion claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11292 by Chengjia Wang, Guang Yang, Heye Zhang, Huafeng Liu, Ming Li, Shuo Li, Weiwei Zhang, Wei Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top left: multi-view samples (A2C, A3C, and A4C). Top right: A4C samples across vendors and centers. Bottom row: echocardiographic sequence. identification of end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) phases. Cardiologists usually check multi-view echocardiographic sequences in clinical decision-making [2]. The apical-2-chamber view (A2C), A3C, and A4C are the most commonly used views for the left ventricle… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Workflow overview of our method. exploits the long term spatial-temporal information in an end-to-end manner and does not depend on any deformable model or optical flow or pretrained segmentation models. RAL can accommodate heterogeneous data, not only gen￾erate accuracy segmentation results but also achieve the classification of different views at the same time and gain prominent temporal stability. 2 Met… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Dilated dense convolution block. Right: Hierarchical ConvLSTMs for spatial-temporal modeling. Pyramid ConvBlocks endow RAL with the superior feature extraction ability and the LV region detection capacity in multi-level and multi-scale space, fur￾ther contribute to capturing the global geometric characteristic of the LV and then establishing uniform semantic features. Thus RAL can detect and extract … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The LV contours of multi-view sequences segmented by our method (red) and experts (green). Ten frames are selected from every sequence to fit the layout view. (top row: A2C; middle row: A3C; bottom row: A4C) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Mean of Accuracy, Dice, HD, and MAD at different frames of the cardiac cycle. Right: BlandAltman analysis (EFa and EFm: ejection fraction calculated from automatic segmentations and manual labels) Table. 2 shows the ablation results, we can see that full RAL achieves higher mean values of Accuracy and Dice, lower mean values of HD and MAD, and lower standard deviations of all metrics compared against… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multi-view echocardiographic sequences segmentation is crucial for clinical diagnosis. However, this task is challenging due to limited labeled data, huge noise, and large gaps across views. Here we propose a recurrent aggregation learning method to tackle this challenging task. By pyramid ConvBlocks, multi-level and multi-scale features are extracted efficiently. Hierarchical ConvLSTMs next fuse these features and capture spatial-temporal information in multi-level and multi-scale space. We further introduce a double-branch aggregation mechanism for segmentation and classification which are mutually promoted by deep aggregation of multi-level and multi-scale features. The segmentation branch provides information to guide the classification while the classification branch affords multi-view regularization to refine segmentations and further lessen gaps across views. Our method is built as an end-to-end framework for segmentation and classification. Adequate experiments on our multi-view dataset (9000 labeled images) and the CAMUS dataset (1800 labeled images) corroborate that our method achieves not only superior segmentation and classification accuracy but also prominent temporal stability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a recurrent aggregation learning method for multi-view echocardiographic sequence segmentation and classification. It extracts multi-level and multi-scale features via pyramid ConvBlocks, fuses them with Hierarchical ConvLSTMs to capture spatial-temporal information, and introduces a double-branch aggregation mechanism in which the segmentation and classification branches mutually promote each other through deep feature aggregation. The segmentation branch guides classification while the classification branch provides multi-view regularization to refine segmentations and reduce view gaps. The end-to-end framework is evaluated on a custom 9000-image multi-view dataset and the CAMUS dataset (1800 images), claiming superior segmentation/classification accuracy and temporal stability.

Significance. If the empirical claims are substantiated with proper controls, the mutual-promotion double-branch design offers a potentially useful architectural idea for joint segmentation-classification in noisy, multi-view medical sequences with limited labels. The emphasis on temporal stability via ConvLSTMs could address a clinically relevant gap in echocardiographic analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The claim of 'superior segmentation and classification accuracy' on the 9000-image and CAMUS datasets is presented without naming the baseline methods, reporting quantitative metrics with error bars, or describing statistical significance tests, making it impossible to assess whether the central empirical claim is supported.
  2. Abstract: No ablation studies, component-wise comparisons, or controls for the double-branch aggregation mechanism are described, so the load-bearing assertion that 'the classification branch affords multi-view regularization to refine segmentations' cannot be evaluated for necessity or contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract. We agree that greater specificity is needed to support the central claims and will revise the abstract accordingly. Point-by-point responses to the major comments are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The claim of 'superior segmentation and classification accuracy' on the 9000-image and CAMUS datasets is presented without naming the baseline methods, reporting quantitative metrics with error bars, or describing statistical significance tests, making it impossible to assess whether the central empirical claim is supported.

    Authors: We acknowledge the abstract's brevity limits detail. The full manuscript reports comparisons to multiple baselines (including U-Net variants and prior recurrent models) with mean Dice/IoU scores, standard deviations across test folds or views, and statistical significance via paired tests as described in Section 4. In the revised manuscript we will expand the abstract to name the primary baselines, cite representative metrics with variability, and note that significance testing was performed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract: No ablation studies, component-wise comparisons, or controls for the double-branch aggregation mechanism are described, so the load-bearing assertion that 'the classification branch affords multi-view regularization to refine segmentations' cannot be evaluated for necessity or contribution.

    Authors: The experiments section contains ablation studies that compare the full double-branch model against segmentation-only and classification-only variants, quantifying the contribution of mutual feature aggregation and the multi-view regularization effect. We agree these controls should be referenced in the abstract. The revised abstract will briefly note that ablation experiments confirm the necessity of the classification branch for segmentation refinement and view-gap reduction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper proposes a neural network architecture (pyramid ConvBlocks, Hierarchical ConvLSTMs, double-branch aggregation) as an end-to-end framework for multi-view echocardiographic segmentation and classification. Claims rest on empirical evaluation across two datasets rather than any derivation chain, equations, or parameter fits. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described method. The central claims of accuracy and temporal stability are presented as experimental outcomes, not reductions to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; typical deep-learning hyperparameters are implicit but unspecified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5717 in / 965 out tokens · 21934 ms · 2026-05-24T16:42:19.544261+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Medical image analysis 18(2), 253–271 (2014)

    Huang, X., et al.: Contour tracking in echocardiographic sequences via sparse rep- resentation and dictionary learning. Medical image analysis 18(2), 253–271 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    npj Digital Medicine 1(1), 6 (2018)

    Madani, A., et al.: Fast and accurate view classification of echocardiograms using deep learning. npj Digital Medicine 1(1), 6 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Imaging 16(3), 233–271 (2015) Recurrent Aggregation Learning for Multi-View Sequences Segmentation 9

    Lang, R.M., et al.: Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the american society of echocardio- graphy and the european association of cardiovascular imaging. European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Imaging 16(3), 233–271 (2015) Recurrent Aggregation Learning for Multi-View Sequences Segmentation 9

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21(3), 968–982 (2012)

    Carneiro, G., et al.: The segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from ultra- sound data using deep learning architectures and derivative-based search methods. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21(3), 968–982 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    In: MICCAI

    Chen, H., et al.: Iterative multi-domain regularized deep learning for anatomical structure detection and segmentation from ultrasound images. In: MICCAI. pp. 487–495. Springer (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging (2019)

    Leclerc, S., et al.: Deep learning for segmentation using an open large-scale dataset in 2d echocardiography. IEEE transactions on medical imaging (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging 36(11), 2287–2296 (2017)

    Pedrosa, J., et al.: Fast and fully automatic left ventricular segmentation and tracking in echocardiography using shape-based b-spline explicit active surfaces. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 36(11), 2287–2296 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Radiology 291(3), 606–617 (2019)

    Zhang, N., et al.: Deep learning for diagnosis of chronic myocardial infarction on nonenhanced cardiac cine mri. Radiology 291(3), 606–617 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 64(8), 1886–1895 (2017)

    Yu, L., et al.: Segmentation of fetal left ventricle in echocardiographic sequences based on dynamic convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 64(8), 1886–1895 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    In: NIPS

    Xingjian, S., et al.: Convolutional lstm network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In: NIPS. pp. 802–810 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    In: MICCAI

    Chen, J., et al.: Multiview two-task recursive attention model for left atrium and atrial scars segmentation. In: MICCAI. pp. 455–463. Springer (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    In: EMBC

    Yang, G., et al.: Multiview sequential learning and dilated residual learning for a fully automatic delineation of the left atrium and pulmonary veins from late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac mri images. In: EMBC. pp. 1123–1127. IEEE (2018)

    work page 2018