Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 2 cited by

VASPKIT: A User-friendly Interface Facilitating High-throughput Computing and Analysis Using VASP Code

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read VASPKIT is a command-line toolkit that turns VASP's raw output into ready-to-use material properties for high-throughput screening.

desk verdict Honest, useful software paper for the widely used VASPKIT toolkit, but Eq. (15) has a wrong coefficient in the Voigt shear modulus and the benchmarks omit computational detail that a revision must supply. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08269 v6 pith:ACJU2QSV submitted 2019-08-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Vei Wang , Nan Xu , Jin Cheng Liu , Gang Tang , Wen-Tong Geng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords high-throughputcomputingVASPdensityfunctionaltheorypost-processingelasticconstantsbandstructureunfoldingopticalpropertiesmoleculardynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

VASPKIT is a command-line program that claims to make high-throughput density functional theory (DFT) calculations with the VASP code practical for researchers. It prepares VASP input files from a single structure file, and it extracts a wide range of properties from VASP's raw output, including elastic constants, band structures, effective masses, optical spectra, and free-energy corrections. The paper demonstrates the pipeline on benchmark systems, reporting a diamond bulk modulus in the range 440 to 442 GPa against an experimental 443 GPa, and an O2 free-energy correction of -0.4467 eV against -0.4468 eV. If the program works as claimed, researchers can script large batches of calculations in bash without writing bespoke parsing code for each property.

What carries the argument

The central object is VASPKIT itself, a command-line program with two modules: a pre-processing module that turns a POSCAR file into complete VASP input sets, standard cells, supercells, and k-paths, and a post-processing module that parses VASP's raw outputs into derived properties. The main analytical engines are the energy-strain method for second-order elastic constants, which fits quadratic energy-strain curves from distorted cells; the standard averaging schemes that turn single-crystal elastic constants into polycrystalline bulk and shear moduli; the effective band-structure unfolding spectral weight formula; the standard transform linking the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function; and the partition-function formulas behind Gibbs free-energy corrections. The design choice that carries the high-throughput claim is exposing every operation as a numbered command-line task, so looping over tasks in a shell script constitutes a screening workflow.

What would settle it

Run VASPKIT on a recent VASP version that changed an output-file format and check whether the WAVECAR-based band unfolding and the OUTCAR-based elastic constants still match independent direct calculations, such as a direct Fourier transform of the same plane-wave coefficients or a separate elastic fit from the same distorted cells. A mismatch on a small benchmark system like diamond would refute the post-processing claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a single integrated Fortran-based toolkit, VASPKIT, can serve as a complete front end and back end for VASP: it reads a structure from POSCAR, generates the INCAR, POTCAR, and KPOINTS files, builds supercells and k-paths, and then parses OUTCAR, WAVECAR, LOCPOT, DOSCAR, and PROCAR to deliver human-readable results. The post-processing side covers elastic mechanics via the energy-strain method, equations of state, band structure and density of states, effective masses, charge and spin densities, electrostatic potentials, Fermi surfaces, real-space wave functions, band unfolding, linear optical properties, joint density of states, transition dipole moments, d-band centers, thermochemistry, and molecular-dynamics correlation functions. The paper validates several pieces with benchmarks, such as a diamond bulk modulus of 440 to 442 GPa versus an experimental 443 GPa and an O2 free-energy correction of -0.4467 eV versus -0.4468 eV. The intended message is that the toolkit lowers the barrier to large-scale DFT screening while producing results consistent with established codes and experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that VASPKIT's routines read the raw output files that VASP writes exactly as VASP writes them, and across the VASP versions users actually run; the paper does not state a version-compatibility range, and any format drift would break the post-processing claims.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • From a single structure file, a user can generate the full VASP input set and a crystallographically recommended k-path, so band-structure calculations need no manual k-point setup.
  • The elastic utility produces the independent second-order elastic constants plus derived bulk, shear, and Young moduli and Poisson's ratio for any crystal system, with benchmark values in close agreement with experiment and prior calculations.
  • Supercell calculations for defects, alloys, and disordered systems can be unfolded back into the primitive Brillouin zone, making defect levels and spectral weights directly comparable with the pristine band structure.
  • Scripting the numbered tasks in bash turns the toolkit into a high-throughput screening engine, a mode the authors used to screen hundreds of two-dimensional semiconductors.
  • The thermochemistry and optical utilities output quantitative corrections and spectra, such as an O2 free-energy correction within 0.0001 eV of experiment and 2D optical conductivities for graphene and phosphorene, that can be plugged directly into catalysis and device models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same task-based design could serve as a reproducibility harness: because input generation and property extraction are recorded as shell commands, a full DFT workflow becomes auditable and rerunnable without GUI steps.
  • If the parser layer were made format-agnostic, the pre- and post-processing workflow could attach to other plane-wave DFT codes; the paper lists this as future work, but the modular structure suggests the main barrier is in the parsers.
  • The benchmark agreements imply a testable extension: combining VASPKIT's elastic-constant, stability-criterion, and batch-mode outputs should reproduce published high-throughput elastic screening of two-dimensional monolayers without custom scripting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents VASPKIT, a Fortran/Python command-line toolkit that provides pre- and post-processing interfaces for VASP calculations. The pre-processing module generates input files, builds supercells, determines symmetry, and supplies Brillouin-zone k-paths; the post-processing module extracts and computes elastic constants, equations of state, band structures, effective masses, charge densities, Fermi surfaces, wave functions, band unfolding, optical properties, joint density of states, transition dipole moments, d-band centers, thermochemical corrections, and molecular-dynamics correlation functions. The paper illustrates each utility with example outputs and benchmarks several quantities against literature or experimental values, including the diamond bulk modulus (440–442 GPa versus 443 GPa experimental), the O2 free-energy correction (−0.4467 eV versus −0.4468 eV), and effective masses for several semiconductors. The authors emphasize the program's high-throughput capability through bash scripting.

Significance. If the described implementations are correct, VASPKIT is a genuinely useful open-source tool that lowers the barrier to high-throughput VASP analysis, and its cross-platform availability and GPLv3 license are concrete strengths. The validation strategy is a notable positive: the benchmark comparisons are made against external literature and experimental values rather than the authors' own fitted parameters, and several matches are quantitative to within a few percent (diamond elastic constants, O2 thermochemical correction, effective masses). The paper also provides reproducible example workflows for many of the utilities. However, the manuscript contains at least one load-bearing formula error in the elastic module (Eq. (15)), and the benchmark section omits the computational parameters needed to reproduce or independently assess the claimed agreement, so the central reliability claim requires revision before the paper can be recommended for publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (15)] The Voigt shear modulus formula in Eq. (15) has an incorrect coefficient: it reads 15G_V = (C11+C22+C33) - (C12+C23+C31) + 4(C44+C55+C66), whereas the standard Voigt average uses the coefficient 3 for the shear terms. For a cubic crystal, the printed formula would give G_V = (C11-C12+4C44)/5 instead of the correct (C11-C12+3C44)/5, systematically overestimating the Voigt bound and consequently the Hill average, Young's modulus, and Poisson ratio. Since Tables 3 and 4 validate only the single-crystal elastic constants Cij and never report polycrystalline moduli, this error would not be detected by the paper's stated benchmarks. The authors should either correct Eq. (15) to use the coefficient 3 or explicitly state that the implementation uses the standard formula if the printed equation is not what the code computes.
  2. [Section 3.1, Tables 3 and 4] The benchmark elastic constants are labeled as PBE calculations, but the manuscript does not report any computational parameters: no plane-wave cutoff, k-point sampling density, PAW potential set, or smearing parameters are given. Without these settings, the agreement with literature values (for example, diamond C11 = 1051 GPa versus 1052 GPa) cannot be reproduced or independently assessed, which weakens the central validation claim that the results produced with different DFT codes are in good agreement. Please add a benchmark subsection that lists the full calculation parameters for all systems in Tables 3 and 4.
  3. [Sections 3.1–3.14 and Program Summary] The post-processing utilities parse VASP output files including OUTCAR, WAVECAR, DOSCAR, PROCAR, and LOCPOT, and the program's usefulness depends on reliably reading these files. The manuscript nowhere states which VASP versions are supported or how the parsers accommodate format differences between VASP releases, leaving the central reliability claim incomplete. Please add a compatibility statement in Section 5 (Limitations) or in the Program Summary indicating the VASP versions tested and any known version-related limitations.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 2.2, Figure 3(a)] The workflow caption in Figure 3(a) refers to 'Eqs. (11)-(12)', but the applicable equations in the text are Eqs. (4)-(5); please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Table 5] The analytic EOS formulas in Table 5 are garbled by typesetting (for example, 'BV0C−BVoν' in the Birch (Lagrange) row), making several formulas unreadable; please regenerate the table cleanly because these formulas are essential to the EOS utility description.
  3. [Section 3.13] The sentence 'VASPKIT neglects the smallest 5 (6) frequencies' is ambiguous and should be clarified; it presumably means that the five or six near-zero translational and rotational modes are excluded from the vibrational partition function, rather than that actual vibrational modes are discarded.
  4. [Section 3.6] The text refers to the 'FermiSurfser' program, but Ref. [72] gives the name 'FermiSurfer'; please correct the typo and ensure consistency.
  5. [Section 1] The Introduction contains the typo 'high-throughout' in the description of high-throughput calculations; please replace it with 'high-throughput'.
  6. [Section 3.5] The text contains the typo 'VAPSKIT' in the sentence about extracting charge-density and potential data; it should read 'VASPKIT'.
  7. [Table 4, SnO row] The layout of the SnO row in Table 4 is difficult to parse, and the value 48.14 N/m versus a cited literature value of 38.9 N/m represents a roughly 24% difference that the text nonetheless describes as 'good agreement'; please clarify which values are being compared and give the literature source for this entry.
  8. [Section 3.9, Eq. (35)] Equation (35) uses δ(Ec-Ev-ω) in the imaginary part of the dielectric function; to be dimensionally consistent with an angular frequency ω, the argument should be δ(Ec-Ev-ℏω), and the authors should double-check the units used in the optical utility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: VASPKIT's claimed outputs are benchmarked against external literature and experimental values, not against its own fitted parameters or self-cited results.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that VASPKIT reliably pre- and post-processes VASP data. The derivation chain for each utility is standard and independently checkable: elastic constants are extracted from energy-strain fits (Eqs. 7-14) and validated against literature values in Tables 3-4; the EOS utility fits standard formulas and reproduces diamond's experimental bulk modulus (440-442 GPa vs 443 GPa, Sec. 3.2); effective masses are compared with literature (Table 6); the O2 free-energy correction matches the experimental NIST value (-0.4467 vs -0.4468 eV, Sec. 3.13). None of these quantities is defined in terms of a fitted VASPKIT parameter, and none of the benchmark values is taken from the authors' own prior work. The only self-citation, Ref. [29], is used to point to a prior high-throughput screening application and is not load-bearing for any algorithm or prediction in this paper. The skeptical observation about Eq. (15), where the Voigt shear modulus is printed with coefficient 4 instead of the standard 3, is a potential correctness/typo issue in the manuscript's formula; it is not a circularity, because the formula is not derived from, nor validated by, the paper's own outputs. Under the review rule that correctness concerns belong outside circularity scoring, this does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim of software correctness rests on standard DFT machinery (provided by VASP) and on standard post-processing formulas from the cited literature. The paper introduces no new physical entities and fits no free parameters to force agreement; benchmark values are compared with independent literature. The main unstated assumptions are that VASP output formats are parsed correctly and that DFT results used as inputs are accurate.

free parameters (3)
  • Strain amplitude range delta for elastic constants = -2% to +2% with 0.5% increments
    User-specified computational setting in the elastic utility; not fitted to data, but affects the curvature fit.
  • Gaussian broadening sigma for joint density of states = Not specified in text
    Used to approximate the Dirac delta in Eq. (48); user-specified and affects smoothness of JDOS plots, not the core physics.
  • k-point spacing for Fermi surface k-mesh = User-defined (kspacing)
    Determines the uniform k-mesh density; user-controlled setting, not fitted.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption VASP's DFT calculations produce reliable Kohn-Sham eigenvalues, wavefunctions, charges, and energies that are meaningful for post-processing.
    Entire post-processing module operates on VASP output; if the underlying DFT results are poor, extracted properties inherit the error.
  • domain assumption VASP output file formats (OUTCAR, WAVECAR, LOCPOT, DOSCAR, PROCAR) are stable and parsed correctly by VASPKIT.
    The code reads these files directly; the paper does not document version-specific behavior, so compatibility is assumed.
  • domain assumption Harmonic approximation and linear elasticity (Eq. 7) are valid for the small strains (-2% to +2%) used for elastic constants.
    The energy-strain method fits a quadratic to small deformations; anharmonic contributions beyond the strain range are ignored.
  • domain assumption For optical properties, the one-electron independent-particle picture applies to dielectric functions unless a many-body GW-BSE calculation is performed.
    Eq. (35) is derived within the independent-particle picture; the paper acknowledges this by also showing GW-BSE for silicon.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of VASPKIT: A User-friendly Interface Facilitating High-throughput Computing and Analysis Using VASP Code." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACJU2QSV

@misc{pith2026190808269,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: VASPKIT: A User-friendly Interface Facilitating High-throughput Computing and Analysis Using VASP Code},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACJU2QSV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08269}
}
read the original abstract

We present the VASPKIT, a command-line program that aims at providing a powerful and user-friendly interface to perform high-throughput analysis of a variety of material properties from the raw data produced by the VASP code. It consists of mainly the pre- and post-processing modules. The former module is designed to prepare and manipulate input files such as the necessary input files generation, symmetry analysis, supercell transformation, k-path generation for a given crystal structure. The latter module is designed to extract and analyze the raw data about elastic mechanics, electronic structure, charge density, electrostatic potential, linear optical coefficients, wave function plots in real space, and etc. This program can run conveniently in either interactive user interface or command line mode. The command-line options allow the user to perform high-throughput calculations together with bash scripts. This article gives an overview of the program structure and presents illustrative examples for some of its usages. The program can run on Linux, MacOS, and Windows platforms. The executable versions of VASPKIT and the related examples, together with the tutorials, are available in its official website vaspkit.com.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08269 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Color online) A structural overview of VASPKIT package. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Color online) Schematic illustration of how to build a supercell from the lattice vectors of primitive cell (PC) and the specified transformation matrix. The supercell and primitive cell are indicated by the yellow and red rhombuses. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Color online) (a) Workflow of the algorithm used in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Color online) A structural overview of the post-processing module implemented into the VASPKIT package. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Color online) Workflow of the algorithm to determine the second-order elastic constants based on energy-strain method used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Color online) The equations of states of diamond using different EOS models as listed in Table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Color online) Projected band structure (left panel) and density of states (right panel) of (a) BiClO ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Color online) The global band structures of the highest valence and lowest conduction bands for (a) MoTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Color online) (a) Schematic illustration of the determination of effective masses based on second-order polynomial fitting around [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Color online) Calculated (a) charge density difference, planar- (blue line) and macroscopic averages (red line) of (b) charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (Color online) (a) Plain Fermi surface of Cu. Orbital-resolved fermi surface of (b) Cu- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (Color online) Calculated isosurfaces of wave functions in real space for (a) CO molecule, (b) VBM and (c) CBM for graphene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (Color online) (a) Workflow of the algorithm used in the band unfolding utility. (b) Band structure of 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (Color online) Effective band structure of 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (Color online) G0W0-BSE calculated (a) absorption coefficient, (b) refractive index, (c) reflectivity and (d) extinction coefficient of silicon. The visible light region is highlighted by vertical color lines. electron eigenvalues obtained from DFT within a many-body …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (Color online) Real (blue line) and imaginary (red line) parts of frequency-dependent optical conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (Color online) Calculated joint density of states for (a) CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: (Color online) Calculated band structure (top panel) and transition dipole moment (bottom panel) for (a) Cs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: (Color online) Calculated (a) MSD, (b) VACF, (c) VDOS and (d) PCF of liquid water at 400 K obtained from MD simulations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First-principles prediction into robust high-performance photovoltaic double perovskites A$_{2}$SiI$_{6}$ (A = K, Rb, Cs)

    physics.app-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    DFT calculations predict K2SiI6 and Rb2SiI6 as stable, lead-free double perovskites with promising photovoltaic absorption.

  2. Altermagnetizing the FeSe-like two-dimensional materials and approaching to giant tunneling magnetoresistance with Janus Cr4BN(B2) MBene electrode

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A DFT study predicts the 2D altermagnet Cr4B3N and a Cr4B3N/vacuum/Cr4B3N junction with a computed TMR of about 91,000% for Cr-B edge electrodes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Hohenberg, W

    P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) B864–B871. doi:10.1103/ PhysRev.136.B864

    1964

  2. [2]

    W. Kohn, L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) A1133–A1138. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133

    doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 1965

  3. [3]

    M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, J. D. Joannopoulos, Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total-energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 1045–1097. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.1045

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.1045 1992

  4. [4]

    R. O. Jones, O. Gunnarsson, The density functional formalism, its applications and prospects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 689–746. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.689

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.689 1989

  5. [5]

    R. O. Jones, Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 (2015) 897–923. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.897

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.897 2015

  6. [6]

    K. Sato, L. Bergqvist, J. Kudrnovsk´ y, P. H. Dederichs, O. Eriksson, I. Turek, B. Sanyal, G. Bouzerar, H. Katayama-Yoshida, V. A. Dinh, T. Fukushima, H. Kizaki, R. Zeller, First-principles theory of dilute magnetic semiconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1633–1690. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1633

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1633 2010

  7. [7]

    Dietl, H

    T. Dietl, H. Ohno, Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: Physics and spintronic structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 187–251. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.187

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.187 2014

  8. [8]

    A. Jain, Y. Shin, K. A. Persson, Computational predictions of energy materials using density functional theory, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 (1) (2016) 15004. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.4

    doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.4 2016

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    Freysoldt, B

    C. Freysoldt, B. Grabowski, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, G. Kresse, A. Janotti, C. G. Van de Walle, First-principles calculations for point defects in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 253–305. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.253

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Pokluda, M

    J. Pokluda, M. ˇCern` y, M.ˇSob, Y. Umeno, Ab initio calculations of mechanical properties: Methods and appli- cations, Prog. Mater Sci. 73 (2015) 127 – 158. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.04.001

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Zhang, Y

    L. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Lv, Y. Ma, Materials discovery at high pressures, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 (4) (2017) 17005. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.5

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    A. R. Oganov, C. J. Pickard, Q. Zhu, R. J. Needs, Structure prediction drives materials discovery, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 (5) (2019) 331–348. doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0101-8

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Gonze, F

    X. Gonze, F. Jollet, F. A. Araujo, D. Adams, B. Amadon, T. Applencourt, C. Audouze, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, A. Bokhanchuk, et al., Recent developments in the abinit software package, Comput. Phys. Commun. 205 (2016) 106 – 131. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.04.003

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    S. J. Clark, M. D. Segall, C. J. Pickard, P. J. Hasnip, M. I. Probert, K. Refson, M. C. Payne, First principles methods using castep, Zeitschrift f¨ ur kristallographie-crystalline materials 220 (5-6) (2005) 567–570. doi:10. 1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075. 28

    2005

  7. [15]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors us- ing a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 (1) (1996) 15 – 50. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0927-0256(96)00008-0

    1996

  8. [16]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 11169–11186. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996 doi

  9. [17]

    J. M. Soler, E. Artacho, J. D. Gale, A. Garc´ ıa, J. Junquera, P. Ordej´ on, D. S´ anchez-Portal, The SIESTA method forab initioorder-nmaterials simulation, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 (11) (2002) 2745–2779. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302

    2002 doi

  10. [18]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. M...

    2009

  11. [19]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum ESPRESSO, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29 (46) (2017) 465901. doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8f79

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    Dewhurst, S

    K. Dewhurst, S. Sharma, L. Nordstrom, F. Cricchio, F. Bultmark, H. Gross, C. Ambrosch-Draxl, C. Persson, C. Brouder, R. Armiento, et al., The elk fp-lapw code, http://elk.sourceforge.net/, accessed April 4, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. H. Madsen, L. D. Marks, Wien2k: An apw+lo program for calculating the properties of solids, J. Chem. Phys. 152 (7) (2020) 074101. doi:10.1063/1.5143061

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    com/products-services/biovia/products/molecular-modeling-simulation/biovia-materials-studio, accessed April 4, 2020

    Dassault syste ` mes biovia, materials studio, 7.0, dassault syste ` mes, san diego, 2017, https://www.3ds. com/products-services/biovia/products/molecular-modeling-simulation/biovia-materials-studio, accessed April 4, 2020

    2017

  15. [23]

    Smidstrup, T

    S. Smidstrup, T. Markussen, P. Vancraeyveld, J. Wellendorff, J. Schneider, T. Gunst, B. Verstichel, D. Stradi, P. A. Khomyakov, U. G. Vej-Hansen, et al., QuantumATK: an integrated platform of electronic and atomic-scale modelling tools, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32 (1) (2019) 0...

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson, G. Ceder, Python materials genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis, Comput. Phys. Sci. 68 (2013) 314 – 319. doi:10.1016/j.co...

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    A. H. Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Du lak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus, et al., The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29 (27) (2017) 273002. doi:10.1088...

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Herath, P

    U. Herath, P. Tavadze, X. He, E. Bousquet, S. Singh, F. Munoz, A. H. Romero, Pyprocar: A python library for electronic structure pre/post-processing, Comput. Phys. Commun. 251 (2020) 107080. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.107080

    2020

  19. [27]

    L. N. Kantorovich, Lev00 & tetr: user-friendly packages for dft codes vasp/siesta/quickstep/crystal/quantum espresso, https://nms.kcl.ac.uk/lev.kantorovitch/codes/lev00/index.html, accessed April 4, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    W. Yi, G. Tang, X. Chen, B. Yang, X. Liu, qvasp: A flexible toolkit for vasp users in materials simulations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 257 (2020) 107535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107535

    2020

  21. [29]

    V. Wang, Y. Liang, Y. Kawazoe, W. Geng, High-throughput computational screening of two-dimensional semi- conductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.04285 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, Spglib: a software library for crystal symmetry search, arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.01590 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kokalj, Computer graphics and graphical user interfaces as tools in simulations of matter at the atomic scale, Comput

    A. Kokalj, Computer graphics and graphical user interfaces as tools in simulations of matter at the atomic scale, Comput. Mater. Sci. 28 (2) (2003) 155–168. doi:10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00104-6. 29

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    S. R. Hall, F. H. Allen, I. D. Brown, The crystallographic information file (cif): a new standard archive file for crystallography, Acta Crystallographica A 47 (6) (1991) 655–685

    1991

  25. [33]

    F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, G. J. Williams, E. F. Meyer, M. D. Brice, J. R. Rodgers, O. Kennard, T. Shi- manouchi, M. Tasumi, The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures, J. Mol. Biol. 112 (3) (1977) 535 – 542. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(...

    1977 doi

  26. [34]

    Hinuma, G

    Y. Hinuma, G. Pizzi, Y. Kumagai, F. Oba, I. Tanaka, Band structure diagram paths based on crystallography, Comput. Phys. Sci. 128 (2017) 140 – 184. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.015

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    Setyawan, S

    W. Setyawan, S. Curtarolo, High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools, Com- put. Mater. Sci. 49 (2) (2010) 299–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010

    2010 doi

  28. [36]

    J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (3) (2007) 90–95. doi:10.1109/ MCSE.2007.55

    2007

  29. [37]

    Voigt, et al., Lehrbuch der kristallphysik, Vol

    W. Voigt, et al., Lehrbuch der kristallphysik, Vol. 962, Teubner Leipzig, 1928

    1928

  30. [38]

    O. H. Nielsen, R. M. Martin, First-principles calculation of stress, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 697–700. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.697

    1983 doi

  31. [39]

    Nielsen, R

    O. Nielsen, R. M. Martin, Stresses in semiconductors: Ab initio calculations on si, ge, and gaas, Phys. Rev. B 32 (6) (1985) 3792. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.32.3792

    1985 doi

  32. [40]

    Zhang, R

    S. Zhang, R. Zhang, Aelas: Automatic elastic property derivations via high-throughput first-principles compu- tation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220 (2017) 403 – 416. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.07.020

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Golesorkhtabar, P

    R. Golesorkhtabar, P. Pavone, J. Spitaler, P. Puschnig, C. Draxl, Elastic: A tool for calculating second-order elastic constants from first principles, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (8) (2013) 1861 – 1873. doi:10.1016/j. cpc.2013.03.010

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    J. F. Nye, et al., Physical properties of crystals: their representation by tensors and matrices, Oxford university press, 1985

    1985

  35. [43]

    Le Page, P

    Y. Le Page, P. Saxe, Symmetry-general least-squares extraction of elastic coefficients from ab initio total energy calculations, Phys. Rev. B 63 (17) (2001) 174103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.63.174103

    2001 doi

  36. [44]

    R. Yu, J. Zhu, H. Ye, Calculations of single-crystal elastic constants made simple, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (3) (2010) 671 – 675. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.11.017

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    Le Page, P

    Y. Le Page, P. Saxe, Symmetry-general least-squares extraction of elastic data for strained materials from ab initio calculations of stress, Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002) 104104. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.104104

    2002 doi

  38. [46]

    Hashin, S

    Z. Hashin, S. Shtrikman, A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of polycrystals, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 10 (4) (1962) 343 – 352. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(62)90005-4

    1962 doi

  39. [47]

    Mouhat, F

    F. Mouhat, F. m. c.-X. Coudert, Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 224104. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    Reuss, Z

    A. Reuss, Z. Angnew, A calculation of the bulk modulus of polycrystalline materials, Math Meth 9 (1929) 55. doi:10.1007/BF00544497

    1929 doi

  41. [49]

    Hill, The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate, Proc

    R. Hill, The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate, Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Sect. A 65 (5) (1952) 349–354. doi:10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307

    1952 doi

  42. [50]

    Ma´ zdziarz, Comment on ‘the computational 2d materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals’, 2D Mater

    M. Ma´ zdziarz, Comment on ‘the computational 2d materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals’, 2D Mater. 6 (4) (2019) 048001. doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ab2ef3

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics Vol 7: Theory and Elasticity, Pergamon press, 1959

    1959

  44. [52]

    X. Wei, B. Fragneaud, C. A. Marianetti, J. W. Kysar, Nonlinear elastic behavior of graphene: Ab initio calcu- lations to continuum description, Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 205407. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.80.205407

    2009 doi

  45. [53]

    Haastrup, M

    S. Haastrup, M. Strange, M. Pandey, T. Deilmann, P. S. Schmidt, N. F. Hinsche, M. N. Gjerding, D. Torelli, P. M. Larsen, A. C. Riis-Jensen, et al., The computational 2d materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals, 2D Mater. 5 (4) (201...

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    L. Wang, A. Kutana, X. Zou, B. I. Yakobson, Electro-mechanical anisotropy of phosphorene, Nanoscale 7 (2015) 9746–9751. doi:10.1039/C5NR00355E

    2015 doi

  47. [55]

    Latimer, S

    K. Latimer, S. Dwaraknath, K. Mathew, D. Winston, K. A. Persson, Evaluation of thermodynamic equations of state across chemistry and structure in the materials project, npj Comput. Mater. 4 (1) (2018) 40. doi: 10.1038/s41524-018-0091-x

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    O. L. Anderson, O. L. Anderson, et al., Equations of state of solids for geophysics and ceramic science, no. 31, Oxford University Press on Demand, 1995

    1995

  49. [57]

    F. D. Murnaghan, The compressibility of media under extreme pressures, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci 30 (9) (1944) 244–247. doi:10.1073/pnas.30.9.244

    1944 doi

  50. [58]

    Birch, Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals, Phys

    F. Birch, Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 809–824. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.71.809

    1947 doi

  51. [59]

    J. H. Dymond, R. Malhotra, The tait equation: 100 years on, Int. J. Thermophys. 9 (6) (1988) 941–951. doi:10.1007/BF01133262

    1988 doi

  52. [60]

    Vinet, J

    P. Vinet, J. Ferrante, J. H. Rose, J. R. Smith, Compressibility of solids, J. Geophys. Res. 92 (B9) (1987) 9319–9325. doi:10.1029/JB092iB09p09319

    1987 doi

  53. [61]

    Hebbache, M

    M. Hebbache, M. Zemzemi, Ab initio study of high-pressure behavior of a low compressibility metal and a hard material: Osmium and diamond, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 224107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.224107

    2004 doi

  54. [62]

    P. B. Roy, S. B. Roy, Applicability of isothermal three-parameter equations of state of solids—a reappraisal, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 (39) (2005) 6193–6216. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/17/39/007

    2005 doi

  55. [63]

    D. C. Pack, W. M. Evans, H. J. James, The propagation of shock waves in steel and lead, Proc. Phys. Soc. 60 (1) (1948) 1–8. doi:10.1088/0959-5309/60/1/302

    1948 doi

  56. [64]

    Poirier, A

    J.-P. Poirier, A. Tarantola, A logarithmic equation of state, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 109 (1) (1998) 1 – 8. doi:10.1016/S0031-9201(98)00112-5

    1998 doi

  57. [65]

    L. D. Whalley, J. M. Frost, B. J. Morgan, A. Walsh, Impact of nonparabolic electronic band structure on the optical and transport properties of photovoltaic materials, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 085207. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.99.085207

    2019

  58. [66]

    A. J. Williamson, L. W. Wang, A. Zunger, Theoretical interpretation of the experimental electronic structure of lens-shaped self-assembled inas/gaas quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 12963–12977. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.62.12963

    2000

  59. [67]

    N. Naka, K. Fukai, Y. Handa, I. Akimoto, Direct measurement via cyclotron resonance of the carrier effective masses in pristine diamond, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 035205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.035205

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    Momma, F

    K. Momma, F. Izumi, VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44 (6) (2011) 1272–1276. doi:10.1107/S0021889811038970

    2011 doi

  61. [69]

    Frisch, G

    M. Frisch, G. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. Scuseria, M. Robb, J. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. Petersson, et al., Gaussian 09, revision a. 02, gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT 200 (2009) 28

    2009

  62. [70]

    Peressi, N

    M. Peressi, N. Binggeli, A. Baldereschi, Band engineering at interfaces: theory and numerical experiments, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 31 (11) (1998) 1273–1299. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/31/11/002

    1998 doi

  63. [71]

    S. B. Dugdale, Life on the edge: a beginner’s guide to the fermi surface, Phys. Scr. 91 (5) (2016) 053009. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/91/5/053009

    2016 doi

  64. [72]

    Kawamura, Fermisurfer: Fermi-surface viewer providing multiple representation schemes, Comput

    M. Kawamura, Fermisurfer: Fermi-surface viewer providing multiple representation schemes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 239 (2019) 197–203. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.017

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    Popescu, A

    V. Popescu, A. Zunger, Effective band structure of random alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 236403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.236403

    2010 doi

  66. [74]

    Popescu, A

    V. Popescu, A. Zunger, Extracting e versusk effective band structure from supercell calculations on alloys and impurities, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 085201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085201. 31

    2012 doi

  67. [75]

    Gajdoˇ s, K

    M. Gajdoˇ s, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, J. Furthm¨ uller, F. Bechstedt, Linear optical properties in the projector- augmented wave methodology, Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 045112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045112

    2006 doi

  68. [76]

    Fox, Optical properties of solids (2002)

    M. Fox, Optical properties of solids (2002)

    2002

  69. [77]

    Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys

    L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev. 139 (3A) (1965) A796. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796

    1965 doi

  70. [78]

    Fuchs, J

    F. Fuchs, J. Furthm¨ uller, F. Bechstedt, M. Shishkin, G. Kresse, Quasiparticle band structure based on a gener- alized kohn-sham scheme, Phys. Rev. B 76 (11) (2007) 115109. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.115109

    2007 doi

  71. [79]

    Onida, L

    G. Onida, L. Reining, A. Rubio, Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body green’s-function approaches, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 601–659. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.601

    2002 doi

  72. [80]

    H¨ user, T

    F. H¨ user, T. Olsen, K. S. Thygesen, How dielectric screening in two-dimensional crystals affects the convergence of excited-state calculations: Monolayer mos 2, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 245309. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88. 245309

    2013 doi

  73. [81]

    Cudazzo, I

    P. Cudazzo, I. V. Tokatly, A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 085406. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.085406

    2011 doi

  74. [82]

    Matthes, O

    L. Matthes, O. Pulci, F. Bechstedt, Optical properties of two-dimensional honeycomb crystals graphene, silicene, germanene, and tinene from first principles, New J. Phys. 16 (10) (2014) 105007. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/ 10/105007

    2014 doi

  75. [83]

    Matthes, O

    L. Matthes, O. Pulci, F. Bechstedt, Influence of out-of-plane response on optical properties of two-dimensional materials: First principles approach, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 205408. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.205408

    2016 doi

  76. [84]

    Torbatian, R

    Z. Torbatian, R. Asgari, Optical absorption properties of few-layer phosphorene, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 205407. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.205407

    2018 doi

  77. [85]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, Solid state physics part ii optical properties of solids (2001)

    2001

  78. [86]

    W.-J. Yin, T. Shi, Y. Yan, Unique properties of halide perovskites as possible origins of the superior solar cell performance, Adv. Mater. 26 (27) (2014) 4653–4658. doi:10.1002/adma.201306281

    2014 doi

  79. [87]

    Transition dipole moment, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transition dipole moment&oldid= 902785194/, accessed April 4, 2020

    2020

  80. [88]

    W. Meng, X. Wang, Z. Xiao, J. Wang, D. B. Mitzi, Y. Yan, Parity-forbidden transitions and their impact on the optical absorption properties of lead-free metal halide perovskites and double perovskites, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 (13) (2017) 2999–3007. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01042

    2017 doi

  81. [89]

    J. K. Nørskov, F. Studt, F. Abild-Pedersen, T. Bligaard, Fundamental Concepts in Heterogeneous Catalysis, 1st Edition, Wiley, 2014

    2014

  82. [90]

    Hammer, J

    B. Hammer, J. Nørskov, Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces, Surf. Sci. 343 (3) (1995) 211 – 220. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0

    1995 doi

  83. [91]

    Hammer, J

    B. Hammer, J. Nørskov, Theoretical surface science and catalysis?calculations and concepts, in: Impact of Surface Science on Catalysis, Vol. 45 of Advances in Catalysis, Academic Press, 2000, pp. 71 – 129. doi: 10.1016/S0360-0564(02)45013-4

    doi

  84. [92]

    D. A. McQuarrie, J. D. Simon, Molecular thermodynamics, 1999

    1999

  85. [93]

    J. W. Ochterski, Thermochemistry in gaussian, Gaussian Inc (2000) 1–19

    2000

  86. [94]

    Chase, Tables, nist-janaf thermochemical, J

    M. Chase, Tables, nist-janaf thermochemical, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data Monograph 9 (1998) 12

    1998

  87. [95]

    G. R. Kneller, V. Keiner, M. Kneller, M. Schiller, nmoldyn: A program package for a neutron scattering oriented analysis of molecular dynamics simulations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 91 (1) (1995) 191–214. doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00048-K

    1995 doi

  88. [96]

    R´ og, K

    T. R´ og, K. Murzyn, K. Hinsen, G. R. Kneller, nmoldyn: A program package for a neutron scattering oriented analysis of molecular dynamics simulations, J. Comput. Chem. 24 (5) (2003) 657–667. doi:10.1002/jcc.10243. 32

    2003 doi

  89. [97]

    S.-T. Lin, M. Blanco, W. A. Goddard, The two-phase model for calculating thermodynamic properties of liquids from molecular dynamics: Validation for the phase diagram of lennard-jones fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 119 (22) (2003) 11792–11805. doi:10.1063/1.1624057

    2003 doi

  90. [98]

    J. M. DICKEY, A. PASKIN, Computer simulation of the lattice dynamics of solids, Phys. Rev. 188 (1969) 1407–1418. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.188.1407

    1969 doi

  91. [99]

    A. K. Soper, C. J. Benmore, Quantum differences between heavy and light water, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 065502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.065502

    2008 doi

  92. [100]

    Imoto, S

    S. Imoto, S. S. Xantheas, S. Saito, Molecular origin of the difference in the hoh bend of the ir spectra between liquid water and ice, J. Chem. Phys. 138 (5) (2013) 054506. doi:10.1063/1.4789951. 33

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.