Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An element-wise approach for simulating transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound thermal ablation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.02372 v1 pith:XU5ZG2G7 submitted 2019-09-05 physics.med-ph

An element-wise approach for simulating transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound thermal ablation

classification physics.med-ph
keywords approachheatingablationelement-wisemagnitudepatientsphasesimulated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This work explored an element-wise approach to model transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) thermal ablation, a noninvasive approach to neurosurgery. Each element of the phased array transducer was simulated individually and could be simultaneously loaded into computer memory, allowing for rapid calculation of the pressure field for different phase offsets used for beam steering and aberration correction. We simulated the pressure distribution for 431 sonications in 32 patients, applied the phase and magnitude values used during treatment, and estimated the resulting temperature rise. We systematically varied the relationship between CT-derived skull density and the acoustic attenuation and sound speed to obtain the best agreement between the predictions and MR temperature imaging (MRTI). The optimization was validated with simulations of 396 sonications from 40 additional treatments. After optimization, the predicted and measured heating agreed well (R2: 0.74 patients 1-32; 0.71 patients 33-72). The dimensions and obliquity of the heating in the simulated temperature maps correlated well with the MRTI (R2: 0.62, 0.74 respectively), but the measured heating was more spatially diffuse. The energy needed to achieve ablation varied by an order of magnitude (3.3-36.1 kJ). While this element-wise approach requires more computation time up front, it can be performed in parallel. It allows for rapid calculation of the three-dimensional heating at the focus for different phase and magnitude values on the array. We also show how this approach can be used to optimize the relationship between CT-derived skull density and acoustic properties. While the relationships found here need further validation in a larger patient population, these results demonstrate the promise of this approach to model TcMRgFUS.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.