The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1909.05610 · v3 · pith:XWDQMII2 · submitted 2019-09-12 · hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

On the Importance of NNLO QCD and Isospin-breaking Corrections in varepsilon'/varepsilon

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:XWDQMII2record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords varepsilonisospin-breakingcorrectionseffectspenguintextanalysisanomaly
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Following the 1999 analysis of Gambino, Haisch and one of us, we stress that all the recent NLO analyses of $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ in the Standard Model (SM) suffer from the renormalization scheme dependence present in the electroweak penguin contributions as well as from scale uncertainties in them related to the matching scale $\mu_W$ and in particular to $\mu_t$ in $m_t(\mu_t)$. We also reemphasize the important role of isospin-breaking and QED effects in the evaluation of $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$. Omitting all these effects, as done in the 2015 analysis by RBC-UKQCD collaboration, and choosing as an example the QCD penguin ($Q_6$) and electroweak penguin ($Q_8$) parameters $B_6^{(1/2)}$ and $B_8^{(3/2)}$ to be $B_6^{(1/2)} = 0.80 \pm 0.08$ and $B_8^{(3/2)} = 0.76 \pm 0.04$ at $\mu = m_c = 1.3$ GeV, we find $(\varepsilon'/\varepsilon)_\text{SM} = (9.4 \pm 3.5) \times 10^{-4}$, whereas including them results in $(\varepsilon'/\varepsilon)_\text{SM} = (5.6\pm 2.4) \times 10^{-4}$. This is an example of an anomaly at the $3.3\,\sigma$ level, which would be missed without these corrections. NNLO QCD contributions to QCD penguins are expected to further enhance this anomaly. We provide a table for $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ for different values of $B_6^{(1/2)}$ and the isospin-breaking parameter $\hat{\Omega}_\text{eff}$, that should facilitate monitoring the values of $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ in the SM when the RBC-UKQCD calculations of hadronic matrix elements including isospin-breaking corrections and QED effects will improve with time.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.