Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On A₁² restrictions of Weyl arrangements

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.05468 v2 pith:S5SPJZVG submitted 2019-10-12 math.CO math.GR

On A₁² restrictions of Weyl arrangements

classification math.CO math.GR
keywords mathcalrestrictionsexponentsorlikrestrictionarrangementsauthorclassical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a Weyl arrangement in an $\ell$-dimensional Euclidean space. The freeness of restrictions of $\mathcal{A}$ was first settled by a case-by-case method by Orlik and the second author (1993), and later by a uniform argument by Douglass (1999). Prior to this, Orlik and Solomon (1983) had completely determined the exponents of these arrangements by exhaustion. A classical result due to Orlik, Solomon and the second author (1986), asserts that the exponents of any $A_1$ restriction, i.e., the restriction of $\mathcal{A}$ to a hyperplane, are given by $\{m_1,\ldots, m_{\ell-1}\}$, where $\exp(\mathcal{A})=\{m_1,\ldots, m_{\ell}\}$ with $m_1 \le \cdots\le m_{\ell}$. As a next step towards conceptual understanding of the restriction exponents we will investigate the $A_1^2$ restrictions, i.e., the restrictions of $\mathcal{A}$ to the subspaces of type $A_1^2$. In this paper, we give a combinatorial description of the exponents and describe bases for the modules of derivations of the $A_1^2$ restrictions in terms of the classical notion of related roots by Kostant (1955).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.