Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deployment Architectures for Cyber-Physical Control Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.01510 v3 pith:GET77X4D submitted 2019-11-04 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC

classification eess.SYcs.SYmath.OC
keywords controllerdeploymentsynthesisarchitecturescommunicationconsidercyber-physicalfully
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of how to deploy a controller to a (networked) cyber-physical system (CPS). Controlling a CPS is an involved task, and synthesizing a controller to respect sensing, actuation, and communication constraints is only part of the challenge. In addition to controller synthesis, one should also consider how the controller will work in the CPS. Put another way, the cyber layer and its interaction with the physical layer need to be taken into account. In this work, we aim to bridge the gap between theoretical controller synthesis and practical CPS deployment. We adopt the system level synthesis (SLS) framework to synthesize a state-feedback controller and provide a deployment architecture for the standard SLS controller. Furthermore, we derive a new controller realization for open-loop stable systems and introduce four different architectures for deployment, ranging from fully centralized to fully distributed. Finally, we compare the trade-offs among them in terms of robustness, memory, computation, and communication overhead.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools