Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Addressing Ambiguity of Emotion Labels Through Meta-Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.02216 v2 pith:W4UYUMG2 submitted 2019-11-06 eess.AS cs.LGcs.SD

classification eess.AScs.LGcs.SD
keywords modellabelsemotionlabelparameterssampleaccuracyaimed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Emotion labels in emotion recognition corpora are highly noisy and ambiguous, due to the annotators' subjective perception of emotions. Such ambiguity may introduce errors in automatic classification and affect the overall performance. We therefore propose a dynamic label correction and sample contribution weight estimation model. Our model is based on a standard BLSTM model with attention with two extra parameters. The first learns a new corrected label distribution, and is aimed to fix the inaccurate labels from the dataset. The other instead estimates the contribution of each sample to the training process, and is aimed to ignore the ambiguous and noisy samples while giving higher weight to the clear ones. We train our model through an alternating optimization method, where in the first epoch we update the neural network parameters, and in the second we keep them fixed to update the label correction and sample importance parameters. When training and evaluating our model on the IEMOCAP dataset, we obtained a weighted accuracy (WA) and unweighted accuracy (UA) of respectively 65.9% and 61.4%. This yielded an absolute improvement of 2.5%, 2.7% respectively compared to a BLSTM with attention baseline, trained on the corpus gold labels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools