FSE/CACM Rebuttal$^2$: Correcting A Large-Scale Study of Programming Languages and Code Quality in GitHub

Emery D. Berger; Jan Vitek; Olga Vitek; Petr Maj

REVIEW

FSE/CACM Rebuttal$^2$: Correcting A Large-Scale Study of Programming Languages and Code Quality in GitHub

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.11894 v1 pith:IYEM3AEV submitted 2019-11-27 cs.SE cs.PL

Emery D. Berger , Petr Maj , Olga Vitek , Jan Vitek This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.SEcs.PL

keywords rebuttalcodelanguagesprogrammingqualitycacmgithublarge-scale

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments

read the original abstract

Ray, Devanbu and Filkov issued a rebuttal of our TOPLAS paper "On the Impact of Programming Languages on Code Quality: A Reproduction Study". Our paper reproduced "A Large-Scale Study of Programming Languages and Code Quality in GitHub", which appeared at FSE 2014 and was subsequently republished as a CACM research highlight in 2017. This article is a rebuttal to that rebuttal.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools