Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring the Input Rank in Global Supply Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.08003 v2 pith:IRBHK32G submitted 2020-01-22 econ.GN q-fin.EC

classification econ.GNq-fin.EC
keywords inputbuyerrankrelevancesupplierschainsglobalinputs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce the Input Rank as a measure of relevance of direct and indirect suppliers in Global Value Chains. We conceive an intermediate input to be more relevant for a downstream buyer if a decrease in that input's productivity affects that buyer more. In particular, in our framework, the relevance of any input depends: i) on the network position of the supplier relative to the buyer, ii) the patterns of intermediate inputs vs labor intensities connecting the buyer and the supplier, iii) and the competitive pressures along supply chains. After we compute the Input Rank from both U.S. and world Input-Output tables, we provide useful insights on the crucial role of services inputs as well as on the relatively higher relevance of domestic suppliers and suppliers coming from regionally integrated partners. Finally, we test that the Input Rank is a good predictor of vertical integration choices made by 20,489 U.S. parent companies controlling 154,836 subsidiaries worldwide.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools