Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Capsule Network Performance with Autonomous Navigation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.03181 v1 pith:AWVRFTKB submitted 2020-02-08 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords caps-emcapsnetscuriosityintrinsicmodulearchitectureautonomouscapsule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Capsule Networks (CapsNets) have been proposed as an alternative to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). This paper showcases how CapsNets are more capable than CNNs for autonomous agent exploration of realistic scenarios. In real world navigation, rewards external to agents may be rare. In turn, reinforcement learning algorithms can struggle to form meaningful policy functions. This paper's approach Capsules Exploration Module (Caps-EM) pairs a CapsNets architecture with an Advantage Actor Critic algorithm. Other approaches for navigating sparse environments require intrinsic reward generators, such as the Intrinsic Curiosity Module (ICM) and Augmented Curiosity Modules (ACM). Caps-EM uses a more compact architecture without need for intrinsic rewards. Tested using ViZDoom, the Caps-EM uses 44% and 83% fewer trainable network parameters than the ICM and Depth-Augmented Curiosity Module (D-ACM), respectively, for 1141% and 437% average time improvement over the ICM and D-ACM, respectively, for converging to a policy function across "My Way Home" scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools