pith. sign in

arxiv: 2002.07730 · v2 · pith:GOUNLK5Bnew · submitted 2020-02-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.str-el

What limits the simulation of quantum computers?

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantumepsiloncomputingcomputerserrordevicesexponentiallyalgorithms
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

It is imperative that useful quantum computers be very difficult to simulate classically; otherwise classical computers could be used for the applications envisioned for the quantum ones. Perfect quantum computers are unarguably exponentially difficult to simulate: the classical resources required grow exponentially with the number of qubits $N$ or the depth $D$ of the circuit. Real quantum computing devices, however, are characterized by an exponentially decaying fidelity $\mathcal{F} \sim (1-\epsilon)^{ND}$ with an error rate $\epsilon$ per operation as small as $\approx 1\%$ for current devices. In this work, we demonstrate that real quantum computers can be simulated at a tiny fraction of the cost that would be needed for a perfect quantum computer. Our algorithms compress the representations of quantum wavefunctions using matrix product states (MPS), which capture states with low to moderate entanglement very accurately. This compression introduces a finite error rate $\epsilon$ so that the algorithms closely mimic the behavior of real quantum computing devices. The computing time of our algorithm increases only linearly with $N$ and $D$. We illustrate our algorithms with simulations of random circuits for qubits connected in both one and two dimensional lattices. We find that $\epsilon$ can be decreased at a polynomial cost in computing power down to a minimum error $\epsilon_\infty$. Getting below $\epsilon_\infty$ requires computing resources that increase exponentially with $\epsilon_\infty/\epsilon$. For a two dimensional array of $N=54$ qubits and a circuit with Control-Z gates, error rates better than state-of-the-art devices can be obtained on a laptop in a few hours. For more complex gates such as a swap gate followed by a controlled rotation, the error rate increases by a factor three for similar computing time.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Efficient Classical Simulation of Heuristic Peaked Quantum Circuits

    quant-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Peaked quantum circuits claimed to show quantum advantage can be classically simulated in one hour on a GPU via mirrored MPO contraction and unswapping.

  2. Benchmarking a machine-learning differential equations solver on a neutral-atom logical processor

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Logical quantum kernels outperform physical ones when solving differential equations on a neutral-atom processor, with gains traced to noise error detection in the logical encoding.