Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Performance Evaluation of Deep Generative Models for Generating Hand-Written Character Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.11424 v1 pith:H67BSYB7 submitted 2020-02-26 cs.CV eess.IV

classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords datasetimagescharacterhand-writtenvariouscharactersgenerativekinds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

There have been many work in the literature on generation of various kinds of images such as Hand-Written characters (MNIST dataset), scene images (CIFAR-10 dataset), various objects images (ImageNet dataset), road signboard images (SVHN dataset) etc. Unfortunately, there have been very limited amount of work done in the domain of document image processing. Automatic image generation can lead to the enormous increase of labeled datasets with the help of only limited amount of labeled data. Various kinds of Deep generative models can be primarily divided into two categories. First category is auto-encoder (AE) and the second one is Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). In this paper, we have evaluated various kinds of AE as well as GANs and have compared their performances on hand-written digits dataset (MNIST) and also on historical hand-written character dataset of Indonesian BALI language. Moreover, these generated characters are recognized by using character recognition tool for calculating the statistical performance of these generated characters with respect to original character images.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools