Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Examining user reviews of conversational systems: a case study of Alexa skills

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.00919 v1 pith:UXWPILS3 submitted 2020-03-02 cs.SE cs.HC

classification cs.SEcs.HC
keywords reviewsissuessystemsuserusersalexaconversationalresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Conversational systems use spoken language to interact with their users. Although conversational systems, such as Amazon Alexa, are becoming common and afford interesting functionalities, there is little known about the issues users of these systems face. In this paper, we study user reviews of more than 2,800 Alexa skills to understand the characteristics of the reviews and issues that are raised in them. Our results suggest that most skills receive less than 50 reviews. Our qualitative study of user reviews using open coding resulted in identifying 16 types of issues in the user reviews. Issues related to the content, integration with online services and devices, error, and regression are top issues raised by the users. Our results also indicate differences in volume and types of complaints by users when compared with more traditional mobile applications. We discuss the implication of our results for practitioners and researchers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools