Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Role of individual components of two-nucleon interaction in nuclear matrix elements of $2\nu\beta\beta$ and $0\nu\beta\beta$ of $^\textbf{48}$Ca: Beyond the closure approximation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.05060 v1 pith:GQKU375Q submitted 2020-03-09 nucl-th

classification nucl-th
keywords betanmescalculatedinteractioncomponentclosurerunningcomponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In the present work, we examine the role of central (C), spin-orbit (SO) and tensor (T) components of two-nucleon interaction in the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) of the two-neutrino double beta decay ($2\nu\beta\beta$) and the light neutrino-exchange mechanism of neutrinoless double beta decay ($0\nu\beta\beta$) of $^{48}$Ca in closure approximation and nonclosure approach. The NMEs are calculated in the nuclear shell-model framework using two-nucleon effective interaction GXPF1A used for $pf$ shell. The decomposition of the shell model two-nucleon interaction into its individual components is performed using the spin-tensor decomposition (STD). The NMEs for $2\nu\beta\beta$ are calculated in running nonclosure method. The NMEs for $0\nu\beta\beta$ are calculated with four different methods, namely, closure, running closure, running nonclosure, and mixed method. Results show that the magnitude of NMEs for $2\nu\beta\beta$ decreases about 7\% with the C+SO component of the interaction as compared to the C component. The magnitude of NMEs is further decreased about 9\% by adding T component to the C+SO component. The NMEs of $0\nu\beta\beta$ calculated in running nonclosure method are enhanced by about 8-10\%, 8-10\%, and 9-12\%, respectively, as compared to corresponding NMEs calculated in running closure method with C, C+SO components and total (C+SO+T) GXPF1A interaction for different SRC parametrization. For both $2\nu\beta\beta$ and $0\nu\beta\beta$, the NMEs calculated with C+SO component is in opposite phase with the NMEs calculated with C component and the total GXPF1A interaction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools