Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Tactic Learning and Proving for the Coq Proof Assistant

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.09140 v1 pith:ECOSFZKM submitted 2020-03-20 cs.AI cs.LO

classification cs.AIcs.LO
keywords prooftacticsystemappliedassistantlearninglemmaslibrary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a system that utilizes machine learning for tactic proof search in the Coq Proof Assistant. In a similar vein as the TacticToe project for HOL4, our system predicts appropriate tactics and finds proofs in the form of tactic scripts. To do this, it learns from previous tactic scripts and how they are applied to proof states. The performance of the system is evaluated on the Coq Standard Library. Currently, our predictor can identify the correct tactic to be applied to a proof state 23.4% of the time. Our proof searcher can fully automatically prove 39.3% of the lemmas. When combined with the CoqHammer system, the two systems together prove 56.7% of the library's lemmas.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools