Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine Learning on Graphs: A Model and Comprehensive Taxonomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.03675 v3 pith:UB7XNS5S submitted 2020-05-07 cs.LG cs.NEcs.SIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.NEcs.SIstat.ML
keywords graphlearningnetworksmethodsneuraldataembeddinggraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There has been a surge of recent interest in learning representations for graph-structured data. Graph representation learning methods have generally fallen into three main categories, based on the availability of labeled data. The first, network embedding (such as shallow graph embedding or graph auto-encoders), focuses on learning unsupervised representations of relational structure. The second, graph regularized neural networks, leverages graphs to augment neural network losses with a regularization objective for semi-supervised learning. The third, graph neural networks, aims to learn differentiable functions over discrete topologies with arbitrary structure. However, despite the popularity of these areas there has been surprisingly little work on unifying the three paradigms. Here, we aim to bridge the gap between graph neural networks, network embedding and graph regularization models. We propose a comprehensive taxonomy of representation learning methods for graph-structured data, aiming to unify several disparate bodies of work. Specifically, we propose a Graph Encoder Decoder Model (GRAPHEDM), which generalizes popular algorithms for semi-supervised learning on graphs (e.g. GraphSage, Graph Convolutional Networks, Graph Attention Networks), and unsupervised learning of graph representations (e.g. DeepWalk, node2vec, etc) into a single consistent approach. To illustrate the generality of this approach, we fit over thirty existing methods into this framework. We believe that this unifying view both provides a solid foundation for understanding the intuition behind these methods, and enables future research in the area.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large-Scale Graph Building in Dynamic Environments: Low Latency and High Quality

    cs.DC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dynamic GUS encodes LSH bucket memberships as sparse embeddings and uses ScaNN to retrieve graph-neighbor candidates in milliseconds, largely preserving Grale's graph quality.

Pith tools