REVIEW 2 cited by
Neural Networks Fail to Learn Periodic Functions and How to Fix It
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Previous literature offers limited clues on how to learn a periodic function using modern neural networks. We start with a study of the extrapolation properties of neural networks; we prove and demonstrate experimentally that the standard activations functions, such as ReLU, tanh, sigmoid, along with their variants, all fail to learn to extrapolate simple periodic functions. We hypothesize that this is due to their lack of a "periodic" inductive bias. As a fix of this problem, we propose a new activation, namely, $x + \sin^2(x)$, which achieves the desired periodic inductive bias to learn a periodic function while maintaining a favorable optimization property of the ReLU-based activations. Experimentally, we apply the proposed method to temperature and financial data prediction.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
UniFlow: Unifying Speech Front-End Tasks via Continuous Generative Modeling
UniFlow unifies four speech front-end tasks in one continuous-latent generative model with task-ID conditioning and reports competitive, but not uniformly superior, benchmark scores.
-
Analysis of Speaker Verification Performance Trade-offs with Neural Audio Codec Transmission
Neural audio codecs match or beat Opus for speaker verification on VoxCeleb1 below 12 kbps and stay within about 1.5 percentage points EER above it.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.