Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Diagnosis Prevalence vs. Efficacy in Machine-learning Based Diagnostic Decision Support

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.13737 v1 pith:NHYBZM7K submitted 2020-06-24 stat.AP cs.IRcs.LG

classification stat.APcs.IRcs.LG
keywords codesicd-9-cmprevalencelearningmachineclassifiersdiagnosisdisease
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Many recent studies use machine learning to predict a small number of ICD-9-CM codes. In practice, on the other hand, physicians have to consider a broader range of diagnoses. This study aims to put these previously incongruent evaluation settings on a more equal footing by predicting ICD-9-CM codes based on electronic health record properties and demonstrating the relationship between diagnosis prevalence and system performance. We extracted patient features from the MIMIC-III dataset for each admission. We trained and evaluated 43 different machine learning classifiers. Among this pool, the most successful classifier was a Multi-Layer Perceptron. In accordance with general machine learning expectation, we observed all classifiers' F1 scores to drop as disease prevalence decreased. Scores fell from 0.28 for the 50 most prevalent ICD-9-CM codes to 0.03 for the 1000 most prevalent ICD-9-CM codes. Statistical analyses showed a moderate positive correlation between disease prevalence and efficacy (0.5866).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools