REVIEW 2 cited by
The Trade-Offs of Private Prediction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning models leak information about their training data every time they reveal a prediction. This is problematic when the training data needs to remain private. Private prediction methods limit how much information about the training data is leaked by each prediction. Private prediction can also be achieved using models that are trained by private training methods. In private prediction, both private training and private prediction methods exhibit trade-offs between privacy, privacy failure probability, amount of training data, and inference budget. Although these trade-offs are theoretically well-understood, they have hardly been studied empirically. This paper presents the first empirical study into the trade-offs of private prediction. Our study sheds light on which methods are best suited for which learning setting. Perhaps surprisingly, we find private training methods outperform private prediction methods in a wide range of private prediction settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy
A practical, extremely thorough survey of differentially private synthetic data generation: methods, privacy units, evaluation metrics, and end-to-end system components across four data modalities.
-
A Comprehensive Guide to Differential Privacy: From Theory to User Expectations
A survey of differential privacy theory, mechanisms, applications, and user-facing issues.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.