Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving distribution and flexible quantization for DCT coefficients

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.12055 v7 pith:75IZBLZS submitted 2020-07-23 cs.IT eess.IVmath.IT

classification cs.ITeess.IVmath.IT
keywords distributionquantizationcoefficientskappaapproxsigmatherealone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

While it is a common knowledge that AC coefficients of Fourier-related transforms, like DCT-II of JPEG image compression, are from Laplace distribution, there was tested more general EPD (exponential power distribution) $\rho\sim \exp(-(|x-\mu|/\sigma)^{\kappa})$ family, leading to maximum likelihood estimated (MLE) $\kappa\approx 0.5$ instead of Laplace distribution $\kappa=1$ - such replacement gives $\approx 0.1$ bits/value mean savings (per pixel for grayscale, up to $3\times$ for RGB). There is also discussed predicting distributions (as $\mu, \sigma, \kappa$ parameters) for DCT coefficients from already decoded coefficients in the current and neighboring DCT blocks. Predicting values $(\mu)$ from neighboring blocks allows to reduce blocking artifacts, also improve compression ratio - for which prediction of uncertainty/width $\sigma$ alone provides much larger $\approx 0.5$ bits/value mean savings opportunity (often neglected). Especially for such continuous distributions, there is also discussed quantization approach through optimized continuous \emph{quantization density function} $q$, which inverse CDF (cumulative distribution function) $Q$ on regular lattice $\{Q^{-1}((i-1/2)/N):i=1\ldots N\}$ gives quantization nodes - allowing for flexible inexpensive choice of optimized (non-uniform) quantization - of varying size $N$, with rate-distortion control. Optimizing $q$ for distortion alone leads to significant improvement, however, at cost of increased entropy due to more uniform distribution. Optimizing both turns out leading to nearly uniform quantization here, with automatized tail handling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools