Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The supermassive black hole masses of reverberation-mapped active galactic nuclei

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.06623 v1 pith:Y3D3IQN2 submitted 2020-08-15 astro-ph.GA

The supermassive black hole masses of reverberation-mapped active galactic nuclei

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords betasigmameanagnsrespectspectrumdispersionoffset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Using different kinds of velocity tracers derived from the broad H$\beta$ profile (in the mean or rms spectrum) and the corresponding virial factors $f$, the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) masses ($M_{\rm BH}$) are calculated for a compiled sample of 120 reverberation-mapped (RM) AGNs. For its subsample of RM AGNs with measured stellar velocity dispersion ($\sigma_{\rm \ast}$), the multivariate linear regression technique is used to calibrate the mean value $f$, as well as the variable FWHM-based $f$. It is found that, whether excluding the pseudo-bulges or not, $M_{\rm BH}$ from the H$\beta$ line dispersion in the mean spectrum ($\sigma_{\rm H\beta,mean}$) has the smallest offset rms with respect to the $M_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\ast}$ relation. For the total sample excluding SDSS-RM AGNs, with respect to $M_{\rm BH}$ from $\sigma_{\rm \ast}$ or that from the H$\beta$ line dispersion in the rms spectrum ($\sigma_{\rm H\beta,rms}$), it is found that we can obtain $M_{\rm BH}$ from the $\sigma_{\rm H\beta,mean}$ with the smallest offset rms of 0.38 dex or 0.23 dex, respectively. It implies that, with respect to the H$\beta$ FWHM, we prefer $\sigma_{\rm H\beta,mean}$ to calculate $M_{\rm BH}$ from the single-epoch spectrum. Using the FWHM-based $f$, we can improve $M_{\rm BH}$ calculation from FWHM(H$\beta$) and the mean $f$, with a decreased offset rms from 0.52 dex to 0.39 dex with respect to $M_{\rm BH}$ from $\sigma_{\rm \ast}$ for the subsample of 36 AGNs with $\sigma_{\rm \ast}$. The value of 0.39 dex is almost the same as that from $\sigma_{\rm H\beta,mean}$ and the mean $f$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.