Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Strategy for Boosting Pair Comparison and Improving Quality Assessment Accuracy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.00370 v1 pith:5JM5WS5P submitted 2020-10-01 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords paircomparisonaccuracydataqualityassessmentstrategysubjective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The development of rigorous quality assessment model relies on the collection of reliable subjective data, where the perceived quality of visual multimedia is rated by the human observers. Different subjective assessment protocols can be used according to the objectives, which determine the discriminability and accuracy of the subjective data. Single stimulus methodology, e.g., the Absolute Category Rating (ACR) has been widely adopted due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, Pair Comparison (PC) is of significant advantage over ACR in terms of discriminability. In addition, PC avoids the influence of observers' bias regarding their understanding of the quality scale. Nevertheless, full pair comparison is much more time-consuming. In this study, we therefore 1) employ a generic model to bridge the pair comparison data and ACR data, where the variance term could be recovered and the obtained information is more complete; 2) propose a fusion strategy to boost pair comparisons by utilizing the ACR results as initialization information; 3) develop a novel active batch sampling strategy based on Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) for PC. In such a way, the proposed methodology could achieve the same accuracy of pair comparison but with the compelxity as low as ACR. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed approach, which outperforms the state of the art approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A hybrid DSCS+PC light-field QA framework and public dataset show objective metrics drop when view-synthesis/3DGS distortions join coding artifacts, and view pooling affects agreement.

Pith tools