Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Post Training Uncertainty Calibration of Deep Networks For Medical Image Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.14290 v1 pith:SNW3US64 submitted 2020-10-27 eess.IV

Post Training Uncertainty Calibration of Deep Networks For Medical Image Segmentation

classification eess.IV
keywords calibrationposttrainednetworkscasescomparedconfidencedropout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural networks for automated image segmentation are typically trained to achieve maximum accuracy, while less attention has been given to the calibration of their confidence scores. However, well-calibrated confidence scores provide valuable information towards the user. We investigate several post hoc calibration methods that are straightforward to implement, some of which are novel. They are compared to Monte Carlo (MC) dropout. They are applied to neural networks trained with cross-entropy (CE) and soft Dice (SD) losses on BraTS 2018 and ISLES 2018. Surprisingly, models trained on SD loss are not necessarily less calibrated than those trained on CE loss. In all cases, at least one post hoc method improves the calibration. There is limited consistency across the results, so we can't conclude on one method being superior. In all cases, post hoc calibration is competitive with MC dropout. Although average calibration improves compared to the base model, subject-level variance of the calibration remains similar.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.