Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Compatibility between the scalar field models of tachyon, $k$-essence and quintessence in $f(R, T)$ gravity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.07321 v1 pith:XATKUQLP submitted 2020-11-14 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords observationscalarfieldphyscosmologicalgravitymodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We investigate the behavior of the scalar field in $f (R, T )$ gravity (Harko et al., Phys. Rev. D 84, 024020, 2011) inside the structure of a flat FRW cosmological model, where $R$ and $T$ have their usual meaning. The deterministic solution of FEs has been settled by considering the scale factor $S(t) = t^{m}e^{kt}$, where $m$ and $k$ are positive constant. Here we utilize three ongoing imperatives ($H_{0}=73.8$ and $ q_{0}=-0.73$) from SNe Ia Union observation (Cunha, Phys. Rev. D 79, 047301, 2009); ($H_{0}=73.8$ and $ q_{0}=-0.55$) from Type Ia Supernova (SNIa) observation in joined with (BAO) and (CMB) observation (Giostri et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03, 027, 2012); and ($H_{0}=69.2$ and $q_{0}=-0.52)$ from (OHD+JLA) observation (Yu et al., Astrophys. J. 856, 3, 2018). We have measured and graphed several cosmological parameters and found that these findings are appropriate in comparison with the universe's physical and kinematic properties and also compatible with ongoing observations. The correspondence between the scalar field models of tachyon, k-essence, and quintessence is investigated by us. Our model explains the potentials and the dynamics of the scalar fields in the FRW universe. The reconstructed potential is very sensible and has a scaling arrangement. Subsequently, our study supports recent observations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools