Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Synthesis to Deployment: Cyber-Physical Control Architectures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.05211 v2 pith:XJYHQNDR submitted 2020-12-09 math.OC cs.SYeess.SY

classification math.OCcs.SYeess.SY
keywords controllerdeploymentsynthesisarchitecturescommunicationconsidercyber-physicalfully
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of how to deploy a controller to a (networked) cyber-physical system (CPS). Controlling a CPS is an involved task, and synthesizing a controller to respect sensing, actuation, and communication constraints is only part of the challenge. In addition to controller synthesis, one should also consider how the controller will be incorporated within the CPS. Put another way, the cyber layer and its interaction with the physical layer need to be taken into account. In this work, we aim to bridge the gap between theoretical controller synthesis and practical CPS deployment. We adopt the system level synthesis (SLS) framework to synthesize a controller, either state-feedback or output-feedback, and provide deployment architectures for the standard SLS controllers. Furthermore, we derive new controller realizations for open-loop stable systems and introduce different state-feedback and output-feedback architectures for deployment, ranging from fully centralized to fully distributed. Finally, we compare the trade-offs among them in terms of robustness, memory, computation, and communication overhead.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools