Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Evidence-based Testability Measurements

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.10877 v1 pith:QFFCP6AT submitted 2021-02-22 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords testabilitytestmeasurementssoftwareapproachcasesevidence-basedidentifying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating Software testability can assist software managers in optimizing testing budgets and identifying opportunities for refactoring. In this paper, we abandon the traditional approach of pursuing testability measurements based on the correlation between software metrics and test characteristics observed on past projects, e.g., the size, the organization or the code coverage of the test cases. We propose a radically new approach that exploits automatic test generation and mutation analysis to quantify the amount of evidence about the relative hardness of identifying effective test cases. We introduce two novel evidence-based testability metrics, describe a prototype to compute them, and discuss initial findings on whether our measurements can reflect actual testability issues.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools