Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Strong lens modelling: comparing and combining Bayesian neural networks and parametric profile fitting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.03257 v2 pith:6YH45CME submitted 2021-03-04 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GA
keywords modellingparametriccentmethodautomatedcombiningconventionalerrors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The vast quantity of strong galaxy-galaxy gravitational lenses expected by future large-scale surveys necessitates the development of automated methods to efficiently model their mass profiles. For this purpose, we train an approximate Bayesian convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict mass profile parameters and associated uncertainties, and compare its accuracy to that of conventional parametric modelling for a range of increasingly complex lensing systems. These include standard smooth parametric density profiles, hydrodynamical EAGLE galaxies and the inclusion of foreground mass structures, combined with parametric sources and sources extracted from the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. In addition, we also present a method for combining the CNN with traditional parametric density profile fitting in an automated fashion, where the CNN provides initial priors on the latter's parameters. On average, the CNN achieved errors 19 $\pm$ 22 per cent lower than the traditional method's blind modelling. The combination method instead achieved 27 $\pm$ 11 per cent lower errors over the blind modelling, reduced further to 37 $\pm$ 11 per cent when the priors also incorporated the CNN-predicted uncertainties, with errors also 17 $\pm$ 21 per cent lower than the CNN by itself. While the CNN is undoubtedly the fastest modelling method, the combination of the two increases the speed of conventional fitting alone by factors of 1.73 and 1.19 with and without CNN-predicted uncertainties, respectively. This, combined with greatly improved accuracy, highlights the benefits one can obtain through combining neural networks with conventional techniques in order to achieve an efficient automated modelling approach.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools