Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The MOSDEF Survey: The Mass-Metallicity relationship and the existence of the FMR at z~1.5

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.09245 v2 pith:25J73RFI submitted 2021-03-16 astro-ph.GA

The MOSDEF Survey: The Mass-Metallicity relationship and the existence of the FMR at z~1.5

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords metallicityevolutionodotalphadeltafindmosdefrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We analyze the rest-optical emission-line ratios of z~1.5 galaxies drawn from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey. Using composite spectra we investigate the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) at z~1.5 and measure its evolution to z=0. When using gas-phase metallicities based on the N2 line ratio, we find that the MZR evolution from z~1.5 to z=0 depends on stellar mass, evolving by $\Delta\rm log(\rm O/H)\sim0.25$ dex at $M_*<10^{9.75}M_{\odot}$ down to $\Delta\rm log(\rm O/H)\sim0.05$ at $M_*>10^{10.5}M_{\odot}$. In contrast, the O3N2-based MZR shows a constant offset of $\Delta\rm log(\rm O/H)\sim0.30$ across all masses, consistent with previous MOSDEF results based on independent metallicity indicators, and suggesting that O3N2 provides a more robust metallicity calibration for our z~1.5 sample. We investigated the secondary dependence of the MZR on SFR by measuring correlated scatter about the mean $M_*$-specific SFR and $M_*-\log(\rm O3N2)$ relations. We find an anti-correlation between $\log(\rm O/H)$ and sSFR offsets, indicating the presence of a $M_*$-SFR-Z relation, though with limited significance. Additionally, we find that our z~1.5 stacks lie along the z=0 metallicity sequence at fixed $\mu=\log(M_*/M_{\odot})-0.6\times\log(\rm SFR / M_{\odot} yr^{-1})$ suggesting that the z~1.5 stacks can be described by the z=0 fundamental metallicity relation (FMR). However, using different calibrations can shift the calculated metallicities off of the local FMR, indicating that appropriate calibrations are essential for understanding metallicity evolution with redshift. Finally, understanding how [NII]/H$\alpha$ scales with galaxy properties is crucial to accurately describe the effects of blended [NII] and H$\alpha$ on redshift and H$\alpha$ flux measurements in future large surveys utilizing low-resolution spectra such as with Euclid and the Roman Space Telescope.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.