Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Trees and stationary reflection at double successors of regular cardinals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.15728 v2 pith:6DFMUJX7 submitted 2021-03-29 math.LO

Trees and stationary reflection at double successors of regular cardinals

classification math.LO
keywords kappamathsfwedgeresultsauthorcardinalsdoublegiven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We obtain an array of consistency results concerning trees and stationary reflection at double successors of regular cardinals $\kappa$, updating some classical constructions in the process. This includes models of $\mathsf{CSR}(\kappa^{++})\wedge \mathsf{TP}(\kappa^{++})$ (both with and without $\mathsf{AP}(\kappa^{++})$) and models of the conjunctions $\mathsf{SR}(\kappa^{++}) \wedge \mathsf{wTP}(\kappa^{++}) \wedge \mathsf{AP}(\kappa^{++})$ and $\neg \mathsf{AP}(\kappa^{++}) \wedge \mathsf{SR}(\kappa^{++})$ (the latter was originally obtained in joint work by Krueger and the first author \cite{GilKru:8fold}, and is here given using different methods). Analogs of these results with the failure of $\mathsf{SH}(\kappa^{++})$ are given as well. Finally, we obtain all of our results with an arbitrarily large $2^\kappa$, applying recent joint work by Honzik and the third author.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.