Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Is segmentation uncertainty useful?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.16265 v1 pith:ZNA5GTI7 submitted 2021-03-30 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords segmentationuncertaintyprobabilisticactiveambiguityconsiderdifferentlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Probabilistic image segmentation encodes varying prediction confidence and inherent ambiguity in the segmentation problem. While different probabilistic segmentation models are designed to capture different aspects of segmentation uncertainty and ambiguity, these modelling differences are rarely discussed in the context of applications of uncertainty. We consider two common use cases of segmentation uncertainty, namely assessment of segmentation quality and active learning. We consider four established strategies for probabilistic segmentation, discuss their modelling capabilities, and investigate their performance in these two tasks. We find that for all models and both tasks, returned uncertainty correlates positively with segmentation error, but does not prove to be useful for active learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools