Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Low-burden Responses to Open Questions in VR

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.12020 v1 pith:RO3N2W6T submitted 2021-04-24 cs.HC

Towards Low-burden Responses to Open Questions in VR

classification cs.HC
keywords questionsopenresponseslow-burdenmethodsresearchstudiessurveying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Subjective self-reports in VR user studies is a burdening and often tedious task for the participants. To minimize the disruption with the ongoing experience VR research has started to administer the surveying directly inside the virtual environments. However, due to the tedious nature of text-entry in VR, most VR surveying tools focus on closed questions with predetermined responses, while open questions with free-text responses remain unexplored. This neglects a crucial part of UX research. To provide guidance on suitable self-reporting methods for open questions in VR user studies, this position paper presents a comparative study with three text-entry methods in VR and outlines future directions towards low-burden qualitative responding.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.