Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Formally Justifying MDL-based Inference of Cause and Effect

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.01902 v1 pith:XNXLJA2B submitted 2021-05-05 cs.IT math.IT

classification cs.ITmath.IT
keywords causepostulatetwo-partalgorithmiccloseeffectencodingsformulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The algorithmic independence of conditionals, which postulates that the causal mechanism is algorithmically independent of the cause, has recently inspired many highly successful approaches to distinguish cause from effect given only observational data. Most popular among these is the idea to approximate algorithmic independence via two-part Minimum Description Length (MDL). Although intuitively sensible, the link between the original postulate and practical two-part MDL encodings is left vague. In this work, we close this gap by deriving a two-part formulation of this postulate, in terms of Kolmogorov complexity, which directly links to practical MDL encodings. To close the cycle, we prove that this formulation leads on expectation to the same inference result as the original postulate.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools