Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainable Machine Learning with Prior Knowledge: An Overview

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.10172 v1 pith:EY5K5YYT submitted 2021-05-21 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningmachineknowledgeexplainabilitypriorresearchexplainableimprove
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This survey presents an overview of integrating prior knowledge into machine learning systems in order to improve explainability. The complexity of machine learning models has elicited research to make them more explainable. However, most explainability methods cannot provide insight beyond the given data, requiring additional information about the context. We propose to harness prior knowledge to improve upon the explanation capabilities of machine learning models. In this paper, we present a categorization of current research into three main categories which either integrate knowledge into the machine learning pipeline, into the explainability method or derive knowledge from explanations. To classify the papers, we build upon the existing taxonomy of informed machine learning and extend it from the perspective of explainability. We conclude with open challenges and research directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The explanation dialogues: an expert focus study to understand requirements towards explanations within the GDPR

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A small expert study (nine questionnaire responses, six interviews) finds that legal experts consider SHAP, DICE, and LORE explanations for credit decisions difficult to understand and lacking the information needed t...

Pith tools