The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2105.13978 · v1 · pith:OMKGL43U · submitted 2021-05-28 · cs.CV

What Is Considered Complete for Visual Recognition?

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:OMKGL43Urecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV
keywords visualannotationscompletedatafeatureshopehumanrecognition
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This is an opinion paper. We hope to deliver a key message that current visual recognition systems are far from complete, i.e., recognizing everything that human can recognize, yet it is very unlikely that the gap can be bridged by continuously increasing human annotations. Based on the observation, we advocate for a new type of pre-training task named learning-by-compression. The computational models (e.g., a deep network) are optimized to represent the visual data using compact features, and the features preserve the ability to recover the original data. Semantic annotations, when available, play the role of weak supervision. An important yet challenging issue is the evaluation of image recovery, where we suggest some design principles and future research directions. We hope our proposal can inspire the community to pursue the compression-recovery tradeoff rather than the accuracy-complexity tradeoff.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.