A study on the plasticity of neural networks
read the original abstract
One aim shared by multiple settings, such as continual learning or transfer learning, is to leverage previously acquired knowledge to converge faster on the current task. Usually this is done through fine-tuning, where an implicit assumption is that the network maintains its plasticity, meaning that the performance it can reach on any given task is not affected negatively by previously seen tasks. It has been observed recently that a pretrained model on data from the same distribution as the one it is fine-tuned on might not reach the same generalisation as a freshly initialised one. We build and extend this observation, providing a hypothesis for the mechanics behind it. We discuss the implication of losing plasticity for continual learning which heavily relies on optimising pretrained models.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Activation Function Design Sustains Plasticity in Continual Learning
Smooth-Leaky and Randomized Smooth-Leaky activations mitigate loss of plasticity in continual learning by targeting negative-branch shape and saturation behavior.
-
Plasticity Loss in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Survey unifies the definition of plasticity loss in DRL, taxonomizes over 50 mitigations, identifies evaluation gaps, and finds general regularization often outperforms domain-specific methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.