REVIEW
Strong convexity in flip-graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Strong convexity in flip-graphs
read the original abstract
The triangulations of a surface $\Sigma$ with a prescribed set of vertices can be endowed with a graph structure $\mathcal{F}(\Sigma)$. Its edges connect two triangulations that differ by a single arc. It is known that, when $\Sigma$ is a convex polygon or a topological surface, the subgraph $\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon(\Sigma)$ induced in $\mathcal{F}(\Sigma)$ by the triangulations that contain a given arc $\varepsilon$ is strongly convex in the sense that all the geodesic paths between two such triangulations remain in that subgraph. Here, we provide a related result that involves a triangle instead of an arc, in the case when $\Sigma$ is a convex polygon. We show that, when the three edges of a triangle $\tau$ appear in (possibly distinct) triangulations along a geodesic path, $\tau$ must belong to a triangulation in that path. More generally, we prove that certain $3$-dimensional triangulations related to the geodesics in $\mathcal{F}(\Sigma)$ are flag when $\Sigma$ is a convex polygon with flat vertices, and provide two consequences. The first is that $\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon(\Sigma)$ is not always strongly convex when $\Sigma$ is a convex polygon with either two flat vertices or two punctures. The second is that the number of arc crossings between two triangulations of a topological surface $\Sigma$ does not allow to approximate their distance in $\mathcal{F}(\Sigma)$ by a factor of less than $3/2$.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.