QBism and Relational Quantum Mechanics compared

Jacques L. Pienaar

REVIEW

QBism and Relational Quantum Mechanics compared

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.13977 v1 pith:JVJVGA43 submitted 2021-08-31 quant-ph physics.hist-ph

Jacques L. Pienaar This is my paper

classification quant-phphysics.hist-ph

keywords mechanicsquantuminterpretationqbismrelationalbayesiancomparedcorrespond

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

The subjective Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics (QBism) and Rovelli's relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) are both notable for embracing the radical idea that measurement outcomes correspond to events whose occurrence (or not) is relative to an observer. Here we provide a detailed study of their similarities and especially their differences.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools