Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Faster Improvement Rate Population Based Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.13800 v1 pith:HLC7SAHJ submitted 2021-09-28 cs.NE stat.ML

Faster Improvement Rate Population Based Training

classification cs.NE stat.ML
keywords performancetrainingfasternetworkspopulationratefireimprovement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The successful training of neural networks typically involves careful and time consuming hyperparameter tuning. Population Based Training (PBT) has recently been proposed to automate this process. PBT trains a population of neural networks concurrently, frequently mutating their hyperparameters throughout their training. However, the decision mechanisms of PBT are greedy and favour short-term improvements which can, in some cases, lead to poor long-term performance. This paper presents Faster Improvement Rate PBT (FIRE PBT) which addresses this problem. Our method is guided by an assumption: given two neural networks with similar performance and training with similar hyperparameters, the network showing the faster rate of improvement will lead to a better final performance. Using this, we derive a novel fitness metric and use it to make some of the population members focus on long-term performance. Our experiments show that FIRE PBT is able to outperform PBT on the ImageNet benchmark and match the performance of networks that were trained with a hand-tuned learning rate schedule. We apply FIRE PBT to reinforcement learning tasks and show that it leads to faster learning and higher final performance than both PBT and random hyperparameter search.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.