Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Machine-learning accelerated turbulence modelling of transient flashing jets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.15203 v1 pith:TUJ4CG5N submitted 2021-09-30 physics.flu-dyn

Machine-learning accelerated turbulence modelling of transient flashing jets

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords modelturbulenceapproachatomisationcomputationalmodellingusedaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Modelling the sudden depressurisation of superheated liquids through nozzles is a challenge because the pressure drop causes rapid flash boiling of the liquid. The resulting jet usually demonstrates a wide range of structures, including ligaments and droplets, due to both mechanical and thermodynamic effects. As the simulation comprises increasingly numerous phenomena, the computational cost begins to increase. One way to moderate the additional cost is to use machine learning surrogacy for specific elements of the calculations. The present study presents a machine learning-assisted computational fluid dynamics approach for simulating the atomisation of flashing liquids accounting for distinct stages, from primary atomisation to secondary break-up to small droplets using the ${\Sigma}$-Y model coupled with the homogeneous relaxation model. Notably, the model for the thermodynamic non-equilibrium (HRM) and ${\Sigma}$-Y are coupled, for the first time, with a deep neural network that simulates the turbulence quantities, which are then used in the prediction of superheated liquid jet atomisation. The data-driven component of the method is used for turbulence modelling, avoiding the solution of the two-equation turbulence model typically used for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations for these problems. Both the accuracy and speed of the hybrid approach are evaluated, demonstrating adequate accuracy and at least 25% faster computational fluid dynamics simulations than the traditional approach. This acceleration suggests that perhaps additional components of the calculation could be replaced for even further benefit.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.