pith. sign in

arxiv: 2111.09447 · v3 · pith:LD6BJP23new · submitted 2021-11-17 · 🧮 math.ST · stat.ME· stat.TH

Unbiased Risk Estimation in the Normal Means Problem via Coupled Bootstrap Techniques

classification 🧮 math.ST stat.MEstat.TH
keywords estimatorrisknoisevectorauxiliarybootstrapnormalproblem
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We develop a new approach for estimating the risk of an arbitrary estimator of the mean vector in the classical normal means problem. The key idea is to generate two auxiliary data vectors, by adding carefully constructed normal noise vectors to the original data. We then train the estimator of interest on the first auxiliary vector and test it on the second. In order to stabilize the risk estimate, we average this procedure over multiple draws of the synthetic noise vector. A key aspect of this coupled bootstrap (CB) approach is that it delivers an unbiased estimate of risk under no assumptions on the estimator of the mean vector, albeit for a modified and slightly "harder" version of the original problem, where the noise variance is elevated. We prove that, under the assumptions required for the validity of Stein's unbiased risk estimator (SURE), a limiting version of the CB estimator recovers SURE exactly. We then analyze a bias-variance decomposition of the error of the CB estimator, which elucidates the effects of the variance of the auxiliary noise and the number of bootstrap samples on the accuracy of the estimator. Lastly, we demonstrate that the CB estimator performs favorably in various simulated experiments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On Data Thinning for Model Validation in Small Area Estimation

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Data thinning splits area-level observations to enable out-of-sample validation of Fay-Herriot models, with recommendations for thinning parameters that balance bias and variance for stable model comparison.