Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Realization-Stability Lemma for Controller Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.02005 v2 pith:NMTKYK7Y submitted 2021-12-03 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords synthesiscontrollerlemmamethodsdifferentrobustsystemanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We have witnessed the emergence of several controller parameterizations and the corresponding synthesis methods, including Youla, system level, input-output, and many other new proposals. Meanwhile, under the same synthesis method, there are multiple realizations to adopt. Different synthesis methods/realizations target different plants/scenarios. Also, various robust results are proposed to deal with different perturbed system structures. Except for some case-by-case studies, we don't currently have a unified framework to understand their relationships. To address the issue, we show that existing controller synthesis methods and realization proposals are all special cases of a simple lemma, the realization-stability lemma. The lemma leads to easier equivalence proofs among existing methods and robust stability conditions for general system analysis. It also enables the formulation of a general controller synthesis problem, which provides a unified foundation for controller synthesis, realization derivation, and robust stability analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools