Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Secure learning-based MPC via garbled circuit

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.03654 v1 pith:75VX23UZ submitted 2021-12-07 eess.SY cs.SY

Secure learning-based MPC via garbled circuit

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords controlencryptedgarbledsecureallowapproximationscircuitefficiently
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Encrypted control seeks confidential controller evaluation in cloud-based or networked systems. Many existing approaches build on homomorphic encryption (HE) that allow simple mathematical operations to be carried out on encrypted data. Unfortunately, HE is computationally demanding and many control laws (in particular non-polynomial ones) cannot be efficiently implemented with this technology. We show in this paper that secure two-party computation using garbled circuits provides a powerful alternative to HE for encrypted control. More precisely, we present a novel scheme that allows to efficiently implement (non-polynomial) max-out neural networks with one hidden layer in a secure fashion. These networks are of special interest for control since they allow, in principle, to exactly describe piecewise affine control laws resulting from, e.g., linear model predictive control (MPC). However, exact fits require high-dimensional preactivations of the neurons. Fortunately, we illustrate that even low-dimensional learning-based approximations are sufficiently accurate for linear MPC. In addition, these approximations can be securely evaluated using garbled circuit in less than 100~ms for our numerical example. Hence, our approach opens new opportunities for applying encrypted control.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.