Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Reconciling the Results of the z~2 MOSDEF and KBSS-MOSFIRE Surveys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.09715 v2 pith:LIMI5OJI submitted 2021-12-17 astro-ph.GA

Reconciling the Results of the z~2 MOSDEF and KBSS-MOSFIRE Surveys

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords kbss-mosfiremosdefsurveysgalaxiestargetedmediansamplessfr
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The combination of the MOSDEF and KBSS-MOSFIRE surveys represents the largest joint investment of Keck/MOSFIRE time to date, with ~3000 galaxies at 1.4<=z<=3.8, roughly half of which are at z~2. MOSDEF is photometric- and spectroscopic-redshift selected with a rest-optical magnitude limit, while KBSS-MOSFIRE is primarily selected based on rest-UV colors and a rest-UV magnitude limit. Analyzing both surveys in a uniform manner with consistent spectral-energy-distribution (SED) models, we find that the MOSDEF z~2 targeted sample has a higher median M_* and redder rest U-V color than the KBSS-MOSFIRE z~2 targeted sample, and a smaller median SED-based SFR and sSFR (SFR(SED) and sSFR(SED)). Specifically, MOSDEF targeted a larger population of red galaxies with U-V and V-J >=1.25, while KBSS-MOSFIRE contains more young galaxies with intense star formation. Despite these differences in the z~2 targeted samples, the subsets of the surveys with multiple emission lines detected and analyzed in previously published work are much more similar. All median host-galaxy properties with the exception of stellar population age -- i.e., M_*, SFR(SED), sSFR(SED), A_V, and UVJ colors -- agree within the uncertainties. Additionally, when uniform emission-line fitting and stellar Balmer absorption correction techniques are applied, there is no significant offset between the two samples in the [OIII]$\lambda$5008/H$\beta$ vs. [NII]$\lambda$6585/H$\alpha$ diagnostic diagram, in contrast to previously-reported discrepancies. We can now combine the MOSDEF and KBSS-MOSFIRE surveys to form the largest z~2 sample with moderate-resolution rest-optical spectra and construct the fundamental scaling relations of star-forming galaxies during this important epoch.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.