Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A forgotten theorem of Pe{l}czy\'nski: (λ+)-injective spaces need not be λ-injective -- the case λin (1,2]

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.07837 v2 pith:5AJFRDV4 submitted 2022-01-19 math.FA

A forgotten theorem of Pe{l}czy\'nski: (λ+)-injective spaces need not be λ-injective -- the case λin (1,2]

classification math.FA
keywords lambdainjectivevarepsiloneverynskiprovedamercase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Isbell and Semadeni [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 107 (1963)] proved that every infinite-dimensional $1$-injective Banach space contains a hyperplane that is $(2+\varepsilon)$-injective for every $\varepsilon > 0$, yet is is \emph{not} $2$-injective and remarked in a footnote that Pe{\l}czy\'nski had proved for every $\lambda > 1$ the existence of a $(\lambda + \varepsilon)$-injective space ($\varepsilon > 0$) that is not $\lambda$-injective. Unfortunately, no trace of the proof of Pe{\l}czy\'nski's result has been preserved. In the present paper, we establish the said theorem for $\lambda\in (1,2]$ by constructing an appropriate renorming of $\ell_\infty$. This contrasts (at least for real scalars) with the case $\lambda = 1$ for which Lindenstrauss [Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1964)] proved the contrary statement.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.